Scribd
Upload
15 views

How Debt Destroys Jobs-And Why We Need A Budget: Senaterepublican - Budgetpressoffice@Budget - Senate.Gov

Higher government debt leads to slower economic growth according to studies. The U.S. debt has surpassed 100% of GDP, above levels found to reduce growth. Senate Democrats have not passed a budget in nearly 1,200 days, during which time $11 trillion was spent and $4.7 trillion was added to the debt. Failure to pass a budget adds uncertainty that harms growth and results in millions of lost jobs each year according to experts.

Uploaded by

api-127658921
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views

How Debt Destroys Jobs-And Why We Need A Budget: Senaterepublican - Budgetpressoffice@Budget - Senate.Gov

Higher government debt leads to slower economic growth according to studies. The U.S. debt has surpassed 100% of GDP, above levels found to reduce growth. Senate Democrats have not passed a budget in nearly 1,200 days, during which time $11 trillion was spent and $4.7 trillion was added to the debt. Failure to pass a budget adds uncertainty that harms growth and results in millions of lost jobs each year according to experts.

Uploaded by

api-127658921
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

From: [email protected].

gov Subject: How Debt Destroys JobsAnd Why We Need A Budget Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:44:14 +0000

July 6, 2012 For Immediate Release Contact: Stephen Miller, Andrew Logan: 202.228.0575

How Debt Destroys JobsAnd Why We Need A Budget


1,164 days have elapsed since Senate Democrats last offered a budget plan for the nation. Since that time, weve spent $11 trillion and added $4.7 trillion to the debt. The unemployment rate has now been above 8 percent for 41 consecutive months.
Higher debt leads to slower economic growth. Empirical studies show that high levels of government debt inhibit economic growth by creating uncertainty, displacing needed private investment, and placing upward pressure on interest rates.[1] For example, a respected study by economists Rogoff and Reinhart found that, in advanced economies with gross federal debt above 90 percent of GDP, median economic growth tends to be between one and two percent lower (depending on the time period analyzed) when compared to countries with lower debt-to-GDP ratios. Other studies, including Caner, Grennes, and Koehler-Geibs 2010 study of 99 countries between 1980 and 2008, reached similar conclusions. The U.S. gross debt-to-GDP ratio has now passed 100 percentwell above the dangerous threshold identified by Rogoff and Reinhart. Senate Democrats last passed a budget nearly 1,200 days ago. Last year the Democrat leadership did not even allow the Budget Committee to meet to work on a budget resolution, and has not offered a budget at all since April 29, 2009. Over that time, the nation has spent $11 trillion and added $4.7 trillion in gross federal debt. Majority Leader Harry Reid went so far as to say it would be foolish for Democrats to produce a budget. But nothing could be more foolish than refusing to lay out a financial plan for the future of the nation. The lack of a budget is a further drag on growth. Asked how harmful it was that the Senate has failed to adopt a budget, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke replied, Is uncertainty about the future of the tax code, government programs and so on a negative for growth? I think it is.[2]

Slower economic growth results in dramatic job loss. Christina Romer, former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, equated a one percentage point change in GDP (the effect posited by Rogoff and Reinhart) with one million jobs per year. Neither President Obama nor members of his Administration have called on their party in the Senate to take action. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was pressed why President Obama had not taken steps to remove that uncertainty by urging the Senate to adopt a budget. Carney responded by saying, I have no opinion, the White House has no opinion [on whether the Senate passes a budget][3] A comment from Arkansas Democrat Senator Mark Pryor underscores the Presidents lack of managerial leadership on this issue: Weve had three years with President Obama where were not able to get a budget resolution passed.[4] Note: To view this document as a 1-page PDF, please click here.

###

[1] While it is true that the U.S. currently enjoys the benefit of low borrowing costs, that is primarily because U.S. Treasury bills are seen as the safest alternative compared to the turmoil in Europe. Additionally, Federal Reserve quantitative easing over the past year has distorted the market by putting an artificial downward pressure on rates. [2] Testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, February 7, 2012. [3] White House Press Briefing, February 8, 2012. [4] Politico, Moderate Dems frustrated by lack of budget, May 15, 2012

You might also like