Scribd
Upload
2K views

Part Orientation and Support Generation

The document discusses factors that affect part orientation for additive manufacturing processes. It describes how part orientation can minimize build time, support material needs, and surface roughness. A cost model is presented that considers preprocessing, build, material, and post-processing costs as factors to optimize for part orientation. Surface quality, support volume reduction, and meeting multiple objectives are also discussed as important considerations for determining optimal part orientation.

Uploaded by

Vivek Desale
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views

Part Orientation and Support Generation

The document discusses factors that affect part orientation for additive manufacturing processes. It describes how part orientation can minimize build time, support material needs, and surface roughness. A cost model is presented that considers preprocessing, build, material, and post-processing costs as factors to optimize for part orientation. Surface quality, support volume reduction, and meeting multiple objectives are also discussed as important considerations for determining optimal part orientation.

Uploaded by

Vivek Desale
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Part Orientation and Support Generation

Factors Affecting Part Orientation


The main envelope of the part in 3D is one of the important factors. For SLA, switching between individual layers takes a significant part of the overall building time, hence must be properly optimized. For FDM, there is no difference between the total building time for adding the modeling materials. But it is still better, where possible, to orient the the part such that the part would firmly stand on the platform during the building process.

Factors Affecting Part Orientation (contd)


For processes that need support structures, part orientation should also be optimized such that it would require minimal support.
There are two key parameters:
While ensuring that the part is firmly supported during the entire prototyping process, the overall support contact area should be minimized. This helps in minimizing the influence of the support on the surface quality of the prototype. Post processing efforts are reduced. The total support volume should also be minimized to save time and material.

Factors Affecting Part Orientation (contd)


The external surfaces produces should be as smooth as possible. This can be achieved by reducing the number of areas of inclined faces.

Other factors such as trapped volume should be avoided in case of SLA. Possible curling should also be considered.

Models for Part Orient Determination


A generic cost Model:
It is assumed that a good STL model is available and the entire evaluation starts from model preparation. The total cost Ct=Cpre+Cbuild+Cm+Cpost (1)

Where
Cpre= Direct cost related to pre-processing Cbuild= Machine Utilization cost for building the prototype model. Cm=Material cost Cpost = Post processing cost.

Models for Part Orient Determination (contd.) The pre-processing cost is determined by the following factors: Model positioning time. Tpos Support Generation Time Tsup Model Slicing time: Tsli Tool path generation time: Tpath Machine Setup Time: Tsetup

Overall Preprocessing Cost Cpre=(Tpos+Tsup+Tsli+Tpath) (Rstaff +Rcomp)+ Tsetup (Rstaff + Rmach) (2) Where Rstaff = Staffing cost ( Can be based on hourly rate) Rcomp=Cost related to Computing facilities and Rapid Prototyping Machine. Rmach=Machine utilization time.

Overall Preprocessing Cost (contd.)

Machine utilization cost can be estimated based on initial machine cost after considering machine depreciation.

Cost Estimation (contd.)


Machine Utilization cost for building the prototype model Cbuild=Tbuild.Rmach

Material cost
Cmat=Cmat-model+Cmat-support

Post Processing Cost


Cpost=Tpost .Rstaff +Cmisc
Where Cmisc stands for miscellaneous costs (post curing, support removal etc.)

Cost Estimation (contd.)

Build time estimation varies from process to process and it dictates the overall cost. In case of SLA it depends on the laser spot dimension, the laser power that determines the scanning speed and the hatching pattern. The switching time between two consecutive layers also contributes significantly in the overall build time.

Cost Estimation (contd.)


In case of SLS process, the build time mainly depends on the laser drawing speed. In case of FDM, the overall building time for a given modeling material is usually not sensitive to part orientation, but part orientation will largely affect the consumption of support material. Part orientation will thus directly influence the overall building time and post processing time.

Cost Estimation (contd.)


In many situations, one can produce multiple parts in a single setup. This is substantially useful for processes such as SLA and SLS that involve substantial times while switching between layers. In addition to part orientation, another technical issue concerns how one should pack the part in 3D in order to achieve maximum utilization of the machine capacity.

Part Orientation for surface quality improvement

Part orientation and Surface quality


While minimizing overall cost, the surface quality of final prototype model must be kept in mind. For fixed building orientation, the minimization of building time and hence overall cost is an optimization issue related to surface quality improvement. If a small layer thickness is used, one would obtain a fine part surface, but the overall build time will be longer and hence the surface quality is improved at a cost. It is however, possible by adjusting the part orientation to obtain an optimal solution with acceptable surface quality at a bearable cost.

d Ve d li n = = = = Volumetric error Layer thickness Perimeter at Layer I, Total number of Layers

Ve

= ni=1 Ai li = ni=1 (0.5 d2 tan li)

Stair-casing Error Evaluation

Part Orientation with minimum Support


Part orientation will affect the volume of the material required for model support and hence build time (for some RP processes). Overhanging part areas having direct contact with support will have a poor surface finish and require more post- processing. The volume of support includes all areas under down-facing and overhanging facets (both in inner as well as outer part surface).

Part

Supports and Base

Platform

Support Structures

Part Orientation with minimum Support


For a given facet of STL model, if the facet normal is pointing downward on the outer part surface or the inner surface surrounding an internal void, and the inclination angle between the facet and the horizontal slicing plane is smaller than 250, the facet is considered a downward facing and overhanging facet while calculating support volume. If the angle is > 250, the structure is considered self supporting.

The support volume can be computed as follows:

Part Orientation with minimum Support (contd.)

Vsup = ni=1 Vi = ni=1 Ai hi Where


n = total number of downward facing and overhanging facets. Ai is the projected area of facet i on to the horizontal plane. hi =The average support height.

Part Orientation (multiple objective optimization)


In general, a part should be oriented to meet the following criteria:
Maximum number of perpendicular surfaces. Maximum number of up-facing horizontal surfaces. Maximum numbers of holes with their axis in the slicing direction. Maximum number of curved cross-sections drawn in the horizontal plane. Maximize the area of the base surface. Minimize the number of sloped surface. Minimize the total area of overhanging surfaces. Minimize the number of trapped volumes. Minimize total number of slices Minimize the height of the required support structures.

Functions of Part Support


To separate parts from platform.
Easy and safe to remove part. Marks on the platform will not be printed on the part.

To provide support to overhang structures.


Prevent structure from collapsing and strengthening overhang regions.

To provide collision avoidance buffer. Process improvement.


To improve liquid flow in and around the part for SLA process (initial build stages & while switching between individual layers).

You might also like