Kim Knowledge Creating Company
Kim Knowledge Creating Company
Overview
About Authors The Distinctive Japanese Approach Tacit/ Explicit Knowledge Knowledge Conversion Enabling Conditions Management and Organizational Structure Implications Conclusion
Authors
Professor (Adjunct) Ikujiro Nonaka Dean of the School of Knowledge Science, Japan PhD (Business Administration), University of California MBA, University of California BS (Political Science),Waseda University
Professor Hirotaka Takeuchi Dean, Hitotsubashi University Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy Ph.D. and M.B.A., the University of California, Berkeley
Knowledge Conversion
Tacit Tacit
Socialization
E I I I I O
Tacit
Externalization
I E I G I
Explicit
Internalization
E
Combination
E G G O G G
Tacit
Explicit
Explicit
Explicit
Knowledge Conversion
Tacit to Explicit
Socialization
Externalization
(Dialogue and collective reflection)
Tacit
from
Internalization
(Organizational learning)
Explicit
Combination
(Information processing)
Example of Socialization
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company
Problem: Automatic home bread-making machine. Volunteered to apprentice themselves to the hotels head baker. No one could explain why. The secret for making tasty bread: stretching and twisting
Example of Externalization
Honda City
Developing the car Used a metaphor: Automobile Evolution What will the automobile evolve into? Tall and short car: Tall Boy Man-maximum, Machine-minimum
Example of Combination
Asahi Breweries
Grand concept: Live Asahi for live people What makes beer appealing Developed Asahi Super Dry beer: richness and sharpness Cooperative product development
Example of Internalization
Matsushita
New policy: reducing yearly working time to 1800 hours Objective: innovating the mindset and management One month experience, working 150 hours Internalized through the one-month experience
Enabling conditions
Intention
aspiration to goals
Autonomy
letting people act independently as far as possible
Redundancy
Enables the knowledge creation to take place organizationally
Requisite variety
Requires equal, fast access to information
Middle-up-down Management Process Top-down and bottom-up management both have limitations. Simply put, knowledge is created by the middle managers, who are often leaders of a team, or task force, through a spiral conversion process involving both the top and the front line employees. Middle managers act as catalysts.
Implications
Create a knowledge vision. Develop a knowledge team. Build a high-density field of interaction at the front line. Piggyback on the new-product development process. Adopt middle-up-down management. Switch to a hypertext organization. Construct a knowledge network with the outside world.
Conclusion
Knowledge is taken as the basis for what an organization dose, but its important to know that creating knowledge can be as important as processing knowledge. Exchange of knowledge is in a very central role. The knowledge should be at hand, where it is needed, instantly. It also should be easily updated and delivered. Creating knowledge will become the key to sustaining a competitive advantage in the future.