Scribd
Upload
937 views

Waterflooding Using Eclipse

This document summarizes reservoir simulation results investigating the effects of oil viscosity and heterogeneity on water flooding performance. It analyzes saturation maps, recovery factors, production rates, and water cuts for homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoir models with different permeability ratios and oil viscosities ranging from 0.3 to 200 cp. The key findings are that recovery factor decreases with increasing viscosity and heterogeneity, while breakthrough time decreases with higher viscosity and flow rate. Heterogeneity results in more channeling and less influence from water flooding.

Uploaded by

Aakriti Bhandari
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
937 views

Waterflooding Using Eclipse

This document summarizes reservoir simulation results investigating the effects of oil viscosity and heterogeneity on water flooding performance. It analyzes saturation maps, recovery factors, production rates, and water cuts for homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoir models with different permeability ratios and oil viscosities ranging from 0.3 to 200 cp. The key findings are that recovery factor decreases with increasing viscosity and heterogeneity, while breakthrough time decreases with higher viscosity and flow rate. Heterogeneity results in more channeling and less influence from water flooding.

Uploaded by

Aakriti Bhandari
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

RESERVOIR SIMULATION

PROJECT B
Effects of Oil Viscosity and heterogeneity on Water Flooding

Professor Pavel Bedrikovetsky

Aakriti Bhandari Konstantin Bobrov Andre Michels Wan Mohd Syafiq Irfan Wan Mohd Shuhaimi

Project B

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction...3 Aim...4 Eclipse Keywords.5 Homogenous (1 Layer) Reservoir Results..6-9

Heterogeneous (5 Layers) Reservoir Results.10-14


Comparison Between Homogenous and Heterogeneous Results..15

Sensitivity Analysis..16-19
Conclusions .20

Project B

INTRODUCTION

Why water flood? It involves drilling injection wells and introduction water through them
It improves oil production Primary Recovery only recovers 5-35% OIIP Water flooding can be used to recover 5-50% of the remaining oil Flooding techniques can be used to improve recovery for highly heterogeneous reservoir.
Project B 3

INTRODUCTION

Buckley-Leverett one dimensional displacement


1

(_)/(_ )

_
0.5


0 0.00

= = Speed/position of waterfront () =

Sw

Swf

0.80

Capillary pressure term in the fractional flow fixes the problem = ( )

< < moves at constant speed stabilized zone > - unstablized zone Abrupt changes in saturation in shock front gradually change in saturation behind water front

AIM

Used Eclipse to investigate the effect of oil viscosity and heterogeneity on well
performance. Plotted oil saturation maps for various viscosities Calculated oil and water production rate at various time and PVI for low and high viscosity oil. Used heterogeneous reservoir with different permeability to examine its effect on Oil recovery

Keywords

Project B

Keywords CWIT DIMENS DZ FWPT PERM RESV TSTEP uo

Function Connection water injected total Number of grid blocks in each direction Length of z direction Field water production total Permeability Specifies a target fluid rate Time step Oil viscosity

Homogeneous 5-spot pattern


Effect of oil Viscosity on waterflooding for a given rate

Rf Vs Viscosity for day 180


0.174 0.173 0.172 0.161 0.148

0.3 cp

0.174

1 cp

0.172
0.075

0.021

0.3

0.7

10

50

200

10 cp

0.148

200 cp

0.021

Project B

Saturation Maps Summary


The profiles below show the changing saturation of oil
Rf Vs PVI for 1 cp
0.69 0.75 0.75 0.77

0.28 0.16

0.1PVI

0.16

BT

0.69

4PVI

0.77

0.1

0.2

0.5434 1 PVI

1.5

Rf Vs PVI for 50 cp
0.52

0.65

0.47

0.17 0.06

0.20

0.1PVI

0.06

BT

0.20

4PVI

0.65

0.1

0.2

0.5434 PVI

1.5

Project B

Recovery Factor
RF at Break through

0.8 0.7 0.6


Recovery factor

0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0


1 Cp 50 Cp

1000

Break through time


BT at 1 and 50 cP at 1000 bbl/d BT at 1 and 50 cP at 6000 bbl/d

Observation: Higher recovery factor with lower viscosity Faster depletion with higher rate(1cP) Higher recovery factor with lower rate(50cP) Explanation: Piston-like displacement for 1cP Bypassing of oil by water (50cP) Mobility ratio between oil and injected water
Project B

Break through time

800 600 400 200 0


1 Cp

50 Cp

Oil production rate and water cut


14000

OPR vs PVI Observations: Increase in Viscosity, less Oil production Different production profile for low and high Viscosity 1 cp

12000

10000 Oil Production rate

8000

6000

4000

50 cp
2000

0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6


PVI

0.8

1.2

Explanations : Time delay for pressure support Slower response in the reservoir Primary drive Difference in oil and water Viscosity

Project B

RESERVOIR SIMULATION

Observations: Reaches Maximum water cut quickly with high flow rate BT happens sooner for high Viscosity Steeper water cut for low viscosity
Project B

Explanations : Difference in oil and water Viscosity Piston like and Finger like flow for different viscosities

11

5 Layer cake 5-spot pattern


Investigating the effect of heterogeneity on water flooding
Setting heterogeneity:

For permeability ratio (Kmax/Kmin = 1, 10, 100) Height = 20 m and kavg = 500 md
Kmax/Kmin = 1 500 500 500 500 500 95.3 442 484 526 953 10 9.88 459 500 543 988 100

All Permeability values are in md


Project B 12

Water Flooding (So)


Effect of oil Viscosity on water flooding for a given rate 0.3 cp 19.9% 1 cp 19.9% Rf Vs Viscosity
0.199 0.199 0.199 0.196 0.192 0.159 RF

10cp

19.2%

200 cp

7.9%

0.079

0.3

0.7

5 Viscosity

10

50

200

Project B

13

5 Layer Saturation Map


The profiles below show the changing saturation of oil
0.1 PVI 16% BT 53.8% 4 PVI 69%

Rf Vs PVI
0.75

1 cp

RF

0.5

50 cp
0.25

0.1 PVI

3.8%

BT

7.7%

4 PVI

48%

0 0 1 PVI 2 3 4

Project B

14

5-LAYER GRAPHS SUMMARY


RF Vs PVI for five layers
0.8
0.7 0.6 Recovery Factor 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

RF at Bt Vs Rate for heteregeneous reservoir


0.75
0.7

R: 1 R: 10 R: 100
Rf at Break through
0.65

R: 1

0.6

R:10

0.55

R:100

0.5 0 0 1 2 3 PVI 4 5 6 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Flow Rate

Homogeneous reservoir has better performance Most heterogeneous reservoir the flow becomes channel which decreases the influence of water flooding
Project B 15

5-LAYER GRAPHS SUMMARY

8000 7000 6000 5000

Production rate Vs PVI

1.2

Water Cut Vs PVI

R:1

0.8

R:10

Fw

Production Rate

R: 100
4000 3000 2000 1000

0.6

R: 100
R:1

0.4

R: 10

0.2

0 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.5

1.5

PVI

PVI

Pressure support drops faster in homogeneous reservoir than in heterogeneous

WC is faster for ratio 1 due to heterogeneity

Project B

16

Recovery Factor Per Layer


Ratio 1
1 0.4 RF 2 RF 3 0.2 4 5 0 0 1 2 PVI 3 4 Field 0 0 2 PVI 4 6 0.4 3 4 0.2 5 Field 0.6

0.6

Ratio 100
1 2

Observation: Lowest permeable layer has the highest rate to increase for 0-1 PVI

Ratio 10
0.6 1 2 0.4 RF 3 4 5 0 0 2 4 PVI 6 8 Field

Explanation: Pressure difference

0.2

Project B

17

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Rf Vs PVI
0.8

R: 1
0.7

R: 10 R: 100

0.6

Recovery Factor

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

PVI

CONCLUSIONS

Eclipse is a sophisticated software for the simulation of waterflooding. The recovery factor, RF decreases as the viscosity increases both for 1 layer and 5 layers case.

Water breakthrough is faster with the high viscosity oil.


Recovery Factor at Breakthrough decreases as heterogeneity increases Water breakthrough occurs first at the layer with the highest permeability.
Project B 19

You might also like