Argumentative Essay: Group Members: - Truong Hai Ha - Tran Kieu Hanh - Truong Thi Phuong - Nguyen Thi Thinh
Argumentative Essay: Group Members: - Truong Hai Ha - Tran Kieu Hanh - Truong Thi Phuong - Nguyen Thi Thinh
Group members:
• Truong Hai Ha
• Tran Kieu Hanh
• Truong Thi Phuong
• Nguyen Thi Thinh
Overview
1. Definition
2. Exposition vs. argumentation
3. Argumentative essay
3.1 Purposes of the essay
3.2 Argumentative topics
3.3 Organization of the essay
3.4 Evidence in the development
3.5 Counter-argument and the refutation
1. Definition
“ An argumentative essay defends a
particular position on a debatable subject.
When you write an argumentative essay,
your purpose is to persuade readers that
your position has merit”
PRO idea 1
PRO idea 2
CON(s) + Refutation(s)
III. Conclusion
Pattern 2:
I. Introduction:
Thesis statement
II. Body:
CON(s) + Refutation(s)
PRO idea 1
PRO idea 2
III. Conclusion
Pattern 3:
I. Introduction:
Thesis statement
II. Body:
CON idea 1 -----
> Refutation
CON idea 2 -----
> Refutation
CON idea 3 -----
> Refutation
Evidence in the
argument development
Kinds of evidence
Some problems with evidence
Kinds of evidence
• Fact: information that can be verified as
objectively true
• Example: a specific illustration of a
general statement
• Authority: someone who is generally
recognized as an expert on a particular
subject
Some problems with
evidence and logic
• False conclusion: the conclusion is not
based on evidence
• Misplaced causes and effects: Just
because one thing follows another doesn’t
mean it is an effect of it and vice versa
• Bad evidence: Evidence is used that
comes from an outdated, incompetent, or
bias source
Counter-argument and the
refutation
Counter-argument, refutation
Methods of refutation
Counter-argument,
Refutation
• Counter-argument: the opposing
viewpoint that disagrees with the writer’s
opinion
• Refutation: the writer’s response to the
counter-argument
Methods of refutation
• Method 1: Demonstrate that the counter-
argument is wrong
• Method 2: Show that the counter-
argument is weak
• Method 3: Agree that the counter-
argument is valid, but show that the
writers’ point of view is more compelling
References
• D.T.Mai, Writing skill course book, Hanoi
2008
• http://www.buowl.boun.edu.tr
• http://essayinfo.com/essays/argumentativ
• http://essayinfo.com/essays/expository_e
• http://depts.gallaudet.edu/englishworks/w
Sample 1
HEALTH AND HEALING
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
“This new theory argues that healing is at
our fingertips: we can be healthy by doing
Reiki on a regular basis.”
Counter arguments Refutation
2. People should trust 2. Reiki is also
medicine since it is scientifically proven
effective and and does not have
scientifically proven. side effects. (refutation
method: insufficient
4. Serious illnesses claim)
such as HIV/AIDS 3. Medicine also cannot
and cancer cannot treat serious illnesses
be treated without if not diagnosed at an
medicine. early stage. (refutation
method: opponents
are partially correct)
6. Reiki, like alternative
healing methods, 4. Reiki requires less
requires a lot of time if done regularly.
time. (refutation method:
opponents are
completely wrong)
Thanks for your
cooperation!