Energy Conservation

A Major Part of the Solution to Energy Generation and Global Warming

Why Us (U.S.)?

With 5% of the worlds population, the U.S. uses 26% of the worlds energy. A U.S. resident consumes 12,000 kWh of electricity a year, nine times the worlds avg. The average American household emits 23,000 pounds of CO2 annually. Two billion people in the world do not have electricity. Just using off the shelf technology we could cut the cost of heating, cooling, and lighting our homes and workplaces by up to 80%.

Electric Energy Conservation in the Home

Art Rosenfeld, Former Commissioner of the California Energy Commission, and pioneer of the Environmental Energy Technologies Division of the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Some slides from his aide, John Wilson

California Electricity Consumption

Annual Electricity Use Per California

Total Electricity Use, per capita, 1960 - 2001

12,000

U.S.

12,000

10,000

8,000
KWh

8,000 7,000

6,000 California 4,000

2,000

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

Average Energy Use per Refrigerator, 1947 to 2009

Estimated Standby kWh (per house)

1200
1000 800 600 400 200 1971 0 1947 1949 1951 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1990 Federal Standard 1993 Federal Standard

2001 Federal Standard 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

2005

2007

2009

Conservation Economic Savings

If California electricity use had kept growing at the US rate, kWh/person would have been 50% higher California electric bill in 2004 ~$32 Billion so weve avoided ~$16 B/yr of electricity bills. Net saving (accounting for cost of conservation measures and programs) is ~$12 B/year, or about $1,000/family/yr. Avoids 18 million tons per year of Carbon Appliance standards save ~$3B/year (1/4)

Lighting

Compact Fluorescents or Long Fluorescents using plasma discharges use only 1/4 of the energy and heat of incandescent lights, which derive their light from heating filaments hot enough to emit visible light. If every home changed their five most used lights, they would save $60 per year in costs. This would also be equal to 21 power plants. The fluorescents also last up to 10 times as long. Replacing one bulb means 1,000 pounds less CO2 emitted over the compact fluorescents lifetime. Traffic signal LEDs use 90% less energy and last 10 years rather than 2 years. Lloyd Levine, Chair of the California Assemblys Utility and Commerce Committee, has proposed the How Many Legislators does it take to Change a Light Bulb Act to ban incandescent bulbs by 2012. Australia has just passed a law to ban incandescent bulbs by 2009.

Compact Fluorescent Bulbs: Do the Math for California

Allocate a 125 watt equivalent bulb for sufficient lighting for each person. Each 125 watt equivalent CFL uses only 30 watts. (Incandescent bulbs only use 5% of their energy for light). They will use 30 watts per person and save 125-30=95 watts over incandescent bulbs. Multiply by 30,000,000 Californians, saves 3 gigawatts of power capacity. 3 gigawatts is more than 10% of the nighttime load. That is equivalent to about three nuclear power plants at one gigawatt each. The cost of this is currently $1.70/person x 30 million people is $50 million. This is equivalent to buying each nuclear power plant for $17 million, rather than $2 billion or more each at current cost estimates.

Household Energy Use for Entertainment Electronics

Primary TV

Secondary TV

Combined energy use0 ~ 1200 kWh per year

200

400

600

Annual Energy Use (kWh)

NRDC, "Tuning in to Energy Efficiency: Prospects for Saving Energy in Televisions," January 2005.

Zero energy new homes

Goals:

70% less electricity => down to ~2,000 kWh/yr 1 kW on peak 1,200 kWh/ yr for TVs, etc. 100-200 W for standby Plasma TV (50) 400 W (Panasonic 200+ W) Rear Projection TV (60) 200 W Large CRT (34) 200 W LCD (32) 100 W

Electronics are a problem!

TV Power

Home Energy Conservation

Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Central resource for the following slides on home energy technology We only select some topics of interest Other sources

California Consumer Energy Center California Flex Your Power

Heating and Cooling in the Home

Accounts for 45% of energy bill or $1,000 per year HVAC Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning SEER efficiency rating of AC Before 1992, typically 6.0 After 1992 required 10.0 Jan. 2006, required minimum 13.0

Annual Usage of Air Conditioning in New Homes in California

2,500

100%
Estimated Impact of 2006 SEER 13 Standards

kWh/YEAR

2,000

1,500

1,000

33%
500 1992 Federal Appliance Standard

1984

2004

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

Source: CEC Demand Analysis Office

2006

Impact of Standards on Efficiency of 3 Appliances

Gas Furnaces
Index (1972 = 100) 80

75%
70

60

Central A/C
50

60%

40

30

Refrigerators

25%
2000

20 1972

1976

1980

1984

1988 Year

1992

1996

Source: S. Nadel, ACEEE, in ECEEE 2003 Summer Study, www.eceee.org

Setback Thermostats

Program to lower temperature setting at night and if gone on weekdays. Required in California Winter suggested: 55 at night, 68 when at home Summer suggested: 85 when gone, 78 when at home 20 to 75% energy savings

Solar Water Heating

Water heating uses 14-25% of energy use Solar water heating replaces the need for 2/3 of conventional water heating. Virtually all homes in Greece and Israel (700,000) use solar water heating. Japan has over 4 million units. The US over a million, with most systems in Florida and California, and Hawaii has 80,000. Each saves 1.5 to 2.5 tons of CO2 a year. Typical cost is $3,000 for 50 square feet. DOE is trying to lower this to $1,000 to $1500. Energy saved would be about 3,000 kWh per year per household DOE would like to have 3 million new units by 2030. Current payback is 10-13 years (solar lobby says 4-8 years), whereas for 50% market penetration, 5-6 years is needed.

Building energy efficiency

Structural Insulated Panels are 4-8 inches thick and are foam filled. They can be faced with drywall and plywood. They give R-4 to R-8 per inch of thickness. Insulation includes batts and rolls, loose fill (blown in), rigid and reflective. Cool Roofs: white reflective roofs on a summers day lower roof temperature from 150-190 F to 100-120 F. Saves 20% on air conditioning costs.

Window Efficiency

Estimated savings for a typical home from

replacing single pane with ENERGY STAR qualified windows are significant in all regions of the country, ranging from $125 to $340 a year.

Energy Intensity or energy/$GDP

Energy conserving potential by sector

Industries: 4-8% Residential: 10-30%, except lighting at 50% Commercial / Public heating and cooling:50% Transportation: 10 20%

Additional Advantages of Energy Conservation

Less need to secure oil and natural gas overseas with attendant military and civilian casualties while costing hundreds of billions of dollars Fewer power plants and liquid natural gas ports are needed Less air pollution Less drilling for oil in Alaska and near national parks Less global warming and attendant environmental destruction

Conclusions on Energy Conservation

Energy conservation has saved the need for many power plants and fuel imports. It has also avoided CO2 and environmental pollution. Energy conservation research is only funded at $306 million this year at DOE, which is low considering the massive amounts of energy production that are being saved by conservation. Regulations on efficiency work, but voluntary efforts lag far behind. Much has been done, but much more can be done In this new era of global warming and high energy costs and energy shortages, the public must be informed and politicians sought who are sensitive to these issues.