What Are Non Parametric Methods!
What Are Non Parametric Methods!
small sample sizes are used to analyze nominal data. Nonparametric method is used when the researcher does not know anything about the parameters of the sample chosen from the population.
his method is sometimes referred to as parameter-free or
distribution-free method.
or Spearman's rho( named after %harles "pearman and often denoted by the )reek letter *rho+ or as ( is a nonparametric measure of statistical dependence between two ,ariables.
't assesses how well the relationship between two
correlation of -. or /. occurs when each of the ,ariables is a perfect monotone function of the other.
23ample !
$esults
'f the ,alue is -.( there is a perfect negati,e correlation 'f the ,alue falls between -. and -5.8( there is a strong negati,e correlation 'f the ,alue falls between -5.8 and 5( there is a weak negati,e correlation 'f the ,alue is 5( there is no correlation 'f the ,alue falls between 5 and 5.8( there is a weak positi,e correlation 'f the ,alue falls between 5.8 and .( there is a strong positi,e correlation 'f the ,alue is .( there is a perfect positi,e correlation between the 7 sets of data. 'f the ,alue is 5( state that null hypothesis is accepted. 9therwise( say it is re:ected.
he Kendalls rank correlation ( commonly referred to as Kendall's tau ( ( is a statistic method used to measure the association between two measured ;uantities. statistical dependence based on the tau coefficient.
A tau test is a non parametric hypothesis test for "pecifically( it is a measure of rank correlation( i.e.( the
similarity of the orderings of the data when ranked by each of the ;uantities. 't is named after Maurice &endall( who de,eloped it in .4<=.
@ypothesis test
he &endall#s rank correlation is often used in a statistical
hypothesis test to establish whether two ,ariables may be regarded as statistically dependent. his test is nonparametric( as it does not rely on any assumptions on the distributions of X or Y or the distribution of *X(Y+.
assumptions to be made about the format of the data( and they may therefore be preferable when the assumptions re;uired for parametric methods are not ,alid.
Nonparametric methods can be useful for dealing with
ordered categorical data in which assignation of scores to indi,idual categories may be inappropriate. Aor e3ample( non-parametric methods can be used to analyse soft drink consumption directly using the categories ne,er( a few times per year( monthly( weekly( a few times per week( daily and a few times per day. 'n contrast( parametric methods re;uire scores *i.e. .?6+ to be assigned to each category.
more traditional approaches . his is a particular concern if the sample size is small or if the assumptions for the corresponding parametric method.
Nonparametric methods are geared toward hypothesis
testing rather than estimation of effects. 't is often possible to obtain nonparametric estimates and associated confidence inter,als( but this is not generally straightforward.
methods can be limited( although the situation is impro,ing. 'n addition( how a software package deals with tied ,alues or how it obtains appropriate P ,alues may not always be ob,ious.
%onclusion
he use of non-parametric methods may be necessary when data ha,e a ranking
Non-parametric methods make fewer assumptions( heir applicability is much wider than the corresponding parametric methods. 'n
particular( they may be applied in situations where less is known about the application in ;uestion. more robust.
Also( due to the reliance on fewer assumptions( non-parametric methods are he use of non-parametric methods is simple and easy. But the wider applicability and increased robustness of non-parametric tests comes
at a cost! in cases where a parametric test would be appropriate( non-parametric tests ha,e less power( Aor e3ample. larger sample size.
Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 199 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Brinjal Prices (Rs/1kg) 66.60 69.50 74.60 72.70 71. 0 72.60 66.70 61.80 58.70 6 .10 59.60 6 .40 68.60
Onion Prices (Rs/1kg) 69.10 66.10 55.50 52.20 59.50 64.40 65.60 78.20 82.80 90. 0 72. 0 74.50 79.40
Rank! Brinjal 6 9 1 12 10 11 7 1 4 2 5 8
Rank! Onion 7 6 2 1 4 5 10 12 1 8 9 11
" #1 11 11 7 7 2 #7 #11 #9 #6 #4 #