01-09C - Introduction To Healthcare and Public Health in The US - Unit 09 - Healthcare Reform - Lecture C
The Health IT Workforce Curriculum was developed for U.S. community colleges to enhance workforce training programmes in health information technology. The curriculum consist of 20 courses of 3 credits each. Each course includes instructor manuals, learning objectives, syllabi, video lectures with accompanying transcripts and slides, exercises, and assessments. The materials were authored by Columbia University, Duke University, Johns Hopkins University, Oregon Health & Science University, and University of Alabama at Birmingham. The project was funded by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. All of the course materials are available under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial ShareAlike (CC BY NC SA) License. The course description, learning objectives, author information, and other details may be found at http://archive.org/details/HealthITWorkforce-Comp01Unit09. The full collection may be browsed at http://knowledge.amia.org/onc-ntdc or at http://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewPortfolio.htm?id=842513.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views
01-09C - Introduction To Healthcare and Public Health in The US - Unit 09 - Healthcare Reform - Lecture C
The Health IT Workforce Curriculum was developed for U.S. community colleges to enhance workforce training programmes in health information technology. The curriculum consist of 20 courses of 3 credits each. Each course includes instructor manuals, learning objectives, syllabi, video lectures with accompanying transcripts and slides, exercises, and assessments. The materials were authored by Columbia University, Duke University, Johns Hopkins University, Oregon Health & Science University, and University of Alabama at Birmingham. The project was funded by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. All of the course materials are available under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial ShareAlike (CC BY NC SA) License. The course description, learning objectives, author information, and other details may be found at http://archive.org/details/HealthITWorkforce-Comp01Unit09. The full collection may be browsed at http://knowledge.amia.org/onc-ntdc or at http://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewPortfolio.htm?id=842513.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13
Introduction to Healthcare and
Public Health in the US
The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c This material (Comp1_Unit9c) was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000015. The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Learning Objectives 2 Describe evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, and quality indicators in medicine (Lecture a, b, c) Describe the patient-centered medical home model (Lecture d) Discuss the key issues driving healthcare reform in the US (Lecture e) Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Quality Indicators In Medicine 3 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c What is quality? "the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes, in a manner that is consistent with current professional knowledge. (Institute of Medicine, 2001) What Does Quality Mean? Better patient outcomes (patient health) Better system performance (patient care) Better professional development (clinician learning) Scientific evidence + particular context = measured performance improvement 4 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 5 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Part of Department of Health and Human Services Mission: to improve quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of healthcare for all Americans Safety and quality: Reduce risk of harm Effectiveness: Improve healthcare outcomes Efficiency: Transform research into practice Methods To Promote Quality 6 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Metrics for measuring quality Process measures Outcome measures Role of EHR in improving quality Data collection Data analysis Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle Organizational standards Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) 7 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c In 2008 the Institute of Medicine noted that patient care should be based on the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence In 2009 the IOM defined CER as evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods Comparative Effectiveness 8 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Generate evidence from research studies Compare drugs, tests, healthcare delivery methods, etc. Researchers may look at existing studies, or devise new studies They may develop or use different methods and sources of data
Steps in Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) 9 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Review and synthesize current medical research Promote and generate new evidence and analytic tools Translate and disseminate research findings to diverse stakeholders Benefits of CER 10 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c CER stakeholders spectrum of individuals who make informed decisions that will improve healthcare CER may provide information about benefits and harms CER can compare costs of different treatments based on outcomes CER helps patients and physicians to choose between treatments Emphasis on CER is a part of Healthcare Reform 11 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Summary Lecture c 12 Defined quality indicators Approaches to quality improvement, e.g., Plan, Do, Study, Act Described Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US References Lecture c References Committee on Quality Healthcare in America, Institute of Medicine, . (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington,, DC: National Academy Press. Comparative Effectiveness Research Funding. (n.d.). Retrieved December 6, 2011, from U.S. Department of Health & Human Services/Recovery website: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/index.html Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. (2009). Retrieved from National Academies Press, Washington DC 20055 website: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12648#toc Sox, H. C., Helfand, M., Grimshaw, J., Dickersin, K., & the PLoS Medicine Editors, et.al. (2010, April 29). Comparative effectiveness research: Challenges for medical journals [editorial]. The Cochrane Library, Retrieved from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/details/editorial/687971/Comparative-Effectiveness-Research- Challenges-for-Medical-Journals.html
13 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 3.0/Spring 2012 Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture c