The 'Resource Curse' of The Scheduled Areas - Case of The Bauxite Industry in Tribal Eastern India
The 'Resource Curse' of The Scheduled Areas - Case of The Bauxite Industry in Tribal Eastern India
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Research Objective & Justification
Conceptual Framework
Research Questions
Methodology
Research Design
Ethics
State
Union
Scheduled Area
Objective
How can the strategy of the state governments of Andhra Pradesh and
Orissa in Eastern India to promote and expand the bauxite mineral industry
be understood given the conflict between this industry and not only, a) the
rights of the local tribal communities but also, b) an apparent imbalance
between the costs and benefits to and distribution within the state itself ?
Justification for topic
- Tribal People among Indias poorest communities
- The main deposits of minerals (metals and coal) are found in tribal areas of
Central-Eastern India
- Indias economic growth and integration with the world economy is causing
rapidly increased mining
- It is not very clear who actually benefits from mining and industry
- Local state research is important when the state is becoming more
independent from the national government
Conceptual Framework
Political Economy of
Industrialisation
Land Rights
Land Use
Customary
Rights
National and
Society Rights
Economic Incentives
Social
Mobilisation
Power
Elite
Capture
Political Incentives
National
Constitution declares
Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled
Areas
Tribal education and job
Reservation
Right to life and livelihood
State
Union
The Indian constitution defined India as a socialist republic with
poverty alleviation and social empowerment as its highest goals
Industrialisation as one of the main means of reducing poverty (Kohli
2004)
Indian state as captured by various interest groups and unable to live up
to its ideals (Bardhan 1984; Rudolph & Rudolph 1987)
Change with economic reforms from 1991 implied that the structure
was not as rigid as authors had earlier indicated Jenkins (1999)
State
Union government budget constraints has meant increasing
independence of the states
Regional parties dominating/influencing national governments
Rise of competition states but also fiscally pressured states
Reform by stealth since it would have gone against the wishes of the
general electorate (Jenkins 1999)
Studying the State:
The developmental state as it is experienced by the poor (Corbridge et.
al. 2005; Rudolph & Jacobsen 2006)
Multiple formal and informal interests within the state (different
political parties, departments within the bureaucracy, urban/ rural divide,
the legal system as formally independent)
Research Questions
1. What have been the changes to tribal rights to land and livelihood in the
Scheduled Areas of eastern India in relation to economic reforms and
industrialisation since the 1990s?
2. What are the characteristics of the political economy of the mineral
industry in relation to the benefits driving demand for increased mineral
industry expansion and the mitigation and distribution of associated costs?
3. What conclusions can be made about the functioning and importance of
the local state in relation to the extraction and processing of bauxite and
the existence of endemic poverty in the tribal areas of India?
Methodology
Orissa
Andhra Pradesh
Deposits
Current Industry
Economy
Regimes
Tribes
Union (Delhi)
Key Informant
Interviews
Analysis of Public
Industrial Policies
and Budget
Documents (national
scope)
State
(Andhra Pradesh
and Orissa)
Key Informant
Interviews
Analysis of Public
Industrial Policies and
Budget Documents, legal
documents and
judgements, investment
agreements (MoUs) (local
state scope)
Annual reports of
companies
Field Survey
Analysis of mining
leases, land records,
satellite imagery
Ethics in Research
Timeline
PhD Plan
Oct
Feasibility Trip to India
Work on Procedural
PP Presentation
Fieldwork
In Delhi
In Andhra Pradesh
In Orissa
Data Analysis
Writing Up
2006
2007
2008
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
2009
Jan
Feb
Mar
The End
Thank You!
Extra Slides
Extra Slides
Alumina
Value (million
USD)
Quantity
(thousands kg)
Aluminium
Value (million
USD)
Quantity
(thousands kg)
Value (million
USD)
1997-1998
0.84
86,876.07
87.32
427,182.89
259.59
1998-1999
5.74
98,942.25
38.78
216,878.74
142.53
1999-2000
6.99
596,800.99
21.07
86,062.45
247.16
2000-2001
27.38
1,248,175.41
43.26
189,309.53
337.22
2001-2002
14.10
979,570.45
45.32
263,103.58
340.17
2002-2003
32.14
1,785,350.22
191.29
1,101,614.37
375.48
2003-2004
37.20
896,137.07
173.09
808,178.53
404.91
2004-2005
29.86
1,016,141.85
294.06
957,703.69
541.27
2005-2006
68.80
2,355,277.13
400.53
1,025,022.97
606.16
Sources
Method
Economics of
mineral industry
Costs
Cost of excavation and transport, Forest
clearance, Water usage, Carbon dioxide usage,
input materials
Benefits (state and national benefits should be
separated)
Royalty (64 rupees per ton of bauxite), CESS
Income taxes and Excise, Employment, Customs
Based on annual reports and other official data
where possible. International cases to be used
where possible
Cost/Benefit
Analysis
Politics of
distribution
Document Analysis
Semi-Structured
Interviews
Type of
Information
Sources
Method
Land use
Document Analysis
Semi-Structured
Interviews
National Government
(fiscal discipline)
International Agencies
(fiscal discipline,
transparency)
State Government
Agricultural
Support to farmers
(vote bank)
Data Analysis
Conclusions
Policy Analysis
Cost/
Benefit
Analysis
Land Use,
Land Records,
Mining
Records
Discourse
Analysis
Key
Informant
Interviews
Court
Judgements
Mines
Industry