Attitude Control System Spacecraft Design
Attitude Control System Spacecraft Design
6/2/15
6/2/15
6/2/15
Spin-Stabilized System
Takes advantage of inherent resistance of
spinning body
No disturbance Momentum vector
remains fixed in inertial space
Disturbance vector parallel to momentum
axis causes spin rate to change
Disturbance vector parallel to momentum
axis causes momentum vector to precess
6/2/15
Spin-Stabilized System
Advantages
Simple, Low cost
Thrust vector control is not required
Spinning supplies scanning motion; necessary for
some instruments
Disadvantage
Pointing accuracy is low
Tight control of moment of inertia is required
Only possible location for solar panels is spinning
body exterior; the area is not exposed to sun all
the time (32%)
6/2/15
Dual-Spin System
Improves the pointing accuracy of
spin stabilized system
Offers the advantages of a spin
stabilized system
Despin drive assembly is expensive and
failure prone
6/2/15
Three-Axis Stabilized
System
A typical system uses gyros as
inertial reference and updates them
periodically using star scanning or
horizon scanning
Attitude errors are removed using
reaction wheels
Thrusters are used to provide
positive or negative translations
6/2/15
Three-Axis Stabilized
System
Advantages
Unlimited pointing capability
Best possible pointing accuracy (>0.001 deg)
Solar panel location and size is not restricted
Can be oriented to illuminate maximum solar panel
area
Disadvantages
Complex, Heavy and High power consumption
More chances of system failure
Thrust vector controlling is required
Redundancy is required
6/2/15
Gravity-Gradient System
Aligns the spacecraft long vector to the
gravity vector
Gravity gradient torques should be greater
than any other disturbances
Moment of inertia about any 2 axes should
be greater than moment about 3 rd axis
Can be used only under 1000 km
Useful when long life and high reliability
are required
6/2/15
Gravity gradient
stabilization
6/2/15
10
6/2/15
11
Disturbance Torques
Solar Torque (35000 km and above)
Momentum exchange between a solar photon
and the spacecraft
12
Solar Torque
Momentum exchange between the solar photon
and spacecraft
A force is exerted on the surface
Absorption
Force will be aligned with the sun vector
Specular reflection
Force exerted is normal to the surface
Diffuse reflection
Absorption and reradiation distributed uniformly over
a hemisphere
Net force is exerted normal to the surface
6/2/15
13
Solar Torque
Absorption
Specular reflection
Diffuse reflection
Ps = Is/c
Is = Incident solar pressure
(1376 W/m2)
Ps = solar pressure (N/m2)
6/2/15
q = reflectance factor
(0~1)
L = centroid of the surface
to center of the mass
14
Example 5.1
Ts = ?
Solar panel = 9 m2
Spacecraft = 1 m2
Attaching Boom = 0.25 m
Angle b/w Sun vector and spacecraft
normal = 20 deg
q = 0.3
6/2/15
15
Magnetic Torque
of any (external) magnetic field on
Torque
16
Magnetic Torque
Residual
magnetic field of a
spacecraft is the result of current
loops and residual magnetism in the
metal parts
6/2/15
17
18
Example 5.2
Spacecraft residual dipole = 2 A-m2
Altitude = 400 km in equatorial orbit
Magnitude of Magnetic moment = ?
6/2/15
19
6/2/15
20
Example 5.3
Estimate the gravity gradient torque on
Skylab
Mass = 90,505 kg
Height = 35 m
Diameter = 5.4 m
Radius = 2.7 m
Altitude = 442 km
Radius = 5820 km
Attitude error = 5 deg (0.087266 rad)
Iz = Wr2/2 , Ix,y = W(3r2+h2)/12
6/2/15
21
Aerodynamic Drag
Drag force produces torque as well
as reduces velocity
= Atmospheric density kg/m3
Cd= drag coefficient (depends upon
shape, usually 2.5)
A = Area normal to the velocity vector
6/2/15
22
Example 5.4
6/2/15
23
Spacecraft Generated
Torques
Pointing rotation of solar panels /
antennas / cameras
Deployment of solar panels /
antennas
Propellant slosh
Flexible appendages
Reaction wheel imbalance
6/2/15
24
System Sizing
Actuator sizing is dependent upon the
combined magnitude of disturbance torques
Actuator must have sufficient authority to
counteract the disturbance
An actuator with twice the capability of
disturbance torques would have 100%
control authority
Once the actuators are decided the required
resources for the mission life must be
analyzed
6/2/15
25
Attitude Determination
Methods
Spacecraft axes must be located with
respect to a reference frame
+Z axis is anti-Nadir (parallel to r)
+X axis in direction of motion (parallel to V)
+Y axis (parallel to r x V direction)
Euler angles
Relationship between reference frame and
the spacecraft frame are defined by three
rotation angles
6/2/15
26
Attitude Determination
Methods
6/2/15
27
Euler Angles
Set of three angles and a sequence
of rotation such that one coordinated
system can be rotated into another
Both magnitude and sequence of
rotation are important
Altering the sequence can change the
resulting rotation
12 different Euler sets result in the same
relative position
6/2/15
28
Euler Angles
6/2/15
29
6/2/15
30
6/2/15
31
Disadvantage of DCM
Performing a rotation requires
27 Multiplications
15 Additions
29 Trigonometric Evaluations
32
Quaternions
Alternative
to DCM
Uses Eulers theorem
Any series of rotations of a rigid body
can be expressed as a single rotation
about a fixed axis
33