Pert CPM
Pert CPM
Project Scheduling:
PERT/CPM
2005 Thomson/South-Western
PERT/CPM
PERT
Program Evaluation and Review Technique
Developed by U.S. Navy for Polaris missile
project
Developed to handle uncertain activity times
CPM
Critical Path Method
Developed by Du Pont & Remington Rand
Developed for industrial projects for which
activity times generally were known
Todays project management software packages
have combined the best features of both
approaches.
2005 Thomson/South-Western
PERT/CPM
2005 Thomson/South-Western
PERT/CPM
2005 Thomson/South-Western
PERT/CPM
2005 Thomson/South-Western
Project Network
A project network can be
constructed to model the
precedence of the activities.
The nodes of the network represent
the activities.
The arcs of the network reflect the
precedence relationships of the
activities.
A critical path for the network is a
path consisting of activities with
zero slack.
2005 Thomson/South-Western
2005 Thomson/South-Western
Time
3
3
2
3
7
3
6
2
8
Project Network
Start
E
C
2
2005 Thomson/South-Western
Finish
H
2
2005 Thomson/South-Western
10
3 6
D
3
Start
6 9
G
6 9
12
18
0 3
E5
C
3 5
2005 Thomson/South-Western
Finish
12
5 7
11
2005 Thomson/South-Western
12
3 6
6 9
3 6 9
9
12
6 9
Start
G
6
3 15
0 3
3 0 3
E
C
3 5
2 3 5
12
18
12
18
18
5 12
7 5 12
Finish
H
5 7
2 16
18
2005 Thomson/South-Western
13
2005 Thomson/South-Western
14
ES
EF LS LF Slack
0
3
0
3
0 (critical)
3
6
6
9
3
3
5
3
5
0 (critical)
6
9
9 12
3
5
12
5 12
0 (critical)
6
9
15 18
9
12
18
12 18
0 (critical)
5
7
16 18
11
2005 Thomson/South-Western
15
Critical Path:
ACEG
18 days
16
Critical Path
B
3 6
6 9
3 6 9
9
12
6 9
Start
G
6
3 15
0 3
3 0 3
E
C
3 5
2 3 5
12
18
12
18
18
5 12
7 5 12
Finish
H
5 7
2 16
18
2005 Thomson/South-Western
17
18
2005 Thomson/South-Western
19
2005 Thomson/South-Western
20
4
0.5
3
2
3
2005 Thomson/South-Western
1
5
2.5
5
1
4
5
5
1.5
6
2.75
6
1.5
5
8
5
7
21
Project Network
D
3
H
S ta rt
6
I
F in is h
K
2005 Thomson/South-Western
22
t = (a + 4m + b)/6
Expected Time
6
4
3
5
1
4
2
6
5
3
5
2005 Thomson/South-Western
2 =
Variance
4/9
4/9
0
1/9
1/36
1/9
4/9
1/9
1
1/9
4/9
23
ES
EF LS
0
6
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
LF Slack
0
6
0*
0
4
5
9
6
9
6
9
6
11
15 20
6
7
12 13
9
13
9 13
9
11
16 18
13
19
14 20
13
18
13 18
19
22
20 23
18
23
18 23
2005 Thomson/South-Western
5
0*
9
6
0*
7
1
0*
1
0*
24
Critical Path:
AC F I K
23 hours
25
0 6
6 0 6
S ta rt
13 19
6 14 20
H
6 7
1 12 13
E
6 9
3 6 9
19 22
3 20 23
J
13 18
5 13 18
I
9 13
4 9 13
0 4
4 5 9
B
2005 Thomson/South-Western
9 11
2 16 18
F in is h
18 23
5 18 23
K
26
2005 Thomson/South-Western
.7612
27
2005 Thomson/South-Western
28
Completion
Activity
Description
Predecessors
(wks)
A
Study Feasibility
--6
B
Purchase Building
A
4
C
Hire Project Leader
A
3
D
Select Advertising Staf
B
6
E
Purchase Materials
B
3
2005
Thomson/South-Western
F
Hire Manufacturing Staf B,C
Time
29
PERT Network
D
B
S ta rt
F in i s h
10
2005 Thomson/South-Western
30
Earliest/Latest Times
Activity ES EF LS LF Slack
A
0
6
0
6
B
6
10
6 10
C
6
9
7 10
D
10
16
16 22
E
10
13
17 20
F
10
20
10 20
G
20
22
20 22
H
22
28
24 30
I
22
30
22 30
2005 Thomson/South-Western
0*
0*
1
6
7
0*
0*
2
0*
31
Critical Activities
10 16
6 16 22
6 10
4 6 10
22 30
8 22 30
I
S ta rt
0
6 0
A
6
6
6 9
3 7 10
10 13
3 17 20
E
F in i s h
20 22
2 20 22
10 20
10 10 20
F
2005 Thomson/South-Western
22 28
6 24 30
32
Ch. 10 7
A project involving the installation of a computer system
comprises eight activities. The following table lists
immediate predecessors and activity times (in weeks).
Activity
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Immediate
Predecessor
A
B,C
D
E
B,C
F,G
Time
3
6
2
5
4
3
9
3
33