Energy Conservation: A Major Part of The Solution To Energy Generation and Global Warming
Energy Conservation: A Major Part of The Solution To Energy Generation and Global Warming
Why Us (U.S.)?
14,000
12,000
12,000
U.S.
10,000
8,000
KWh
8,000
7,000
6,000
California
4,000
2,000
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
1978
1976
1974
1972
1970
1968
1966
1964
1962
1960
Estimated Standby
kWh (per house)
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
1990 Federal
Standard
1993 Federal
Standard
2009
2007
2005
2003
2001
1999
1997
1989
1987
1985
1983
1981
1979
1977
1975
1973
1971
1969
1967
1965
1963
1961
1959
1957
1955
1953
1951
1949
1995
2001 Federal
Standard
200
1993
400
1991
600
1947
2000
Conservation Economic
Savings
If California electricity use had kept growing at
the US rate, kWh/person would have been 50%
higher
California electric bill in 2004 ~$32 Billion
so weve avoided ~$16 B/yr of electricity bills.
Net saving (accounting for cost of conservation
measures and programs) is ~$12 B/year, or
about $1,000/family/yr.
Avoids 18 million tons per year of Carbon
Appliance standards save ~$3B/year (1/4)
Lighting
Allocate a 125 watt equivalent bulb for sufficient lighting for each
person. Each 125 watt equivalent CFL uses only 30 watts.
(Incandescent bulbs only use 5% of their energy for light).
They will use 30 watts per person and save 125-30=95 watts over
incandescent bulbs.
Multiply by 30,000,000 Californians, saves 3 gigawatts of power
capacity.
3 gigawatts is more than 10% of the nighttime load.
That is equivalent to about three nuclear power plants at one
gigawatt each.
The cost of this is currently $1.70/person x 30 million people is $50
million.
This is equivalent to buying each nuclear power plant for $17 million,
rather than $2 billion or more each at current cost estimates.
Primary TV
Secondary TV
DVD/VCR
Digital cable set top box
200
400
600
Goals:
TV Power
Plasma TV (50)
400 W (Panasonic 200+ W)
Rear Projection TV (60) 200 W
Large CRT (34)
200 W
LCD (32)
100 W
year
HVAC Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning
SEER efficiency rating of AC
Before 1992, typically 6.0
After 1992 required 10.0
Jan. 2006, required minimum 13.0
100%
California Title 20
Appliance Standards
1976-1982
2,000
Estimated Impact of
2006 SEER 13
Standards
1,500
1,000
33%
1992 Federal Appliance
Standard
500
2006
2004
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
1978
1976
1974
1972
1970
kWh/YEAR
2,500
Effective Dates of
National Standards
Effective Dates of
State Standards
100
90
Gas Furnaces
80
75%
70
60%
60
Central A/C
50
40
30
20
1972
Refrigerators
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
Year
1996
25%
2000
Setback Thermostats
Program
Window Efficiency
4-8%
Residential: 10-30%, except lighting at 50%
Commercial / Public heating and cooling:50%
Transportation: 10 20%
Conclusions on Energy
Conservation
Energy conservation has saved the need for many power plants
and fuel imports.
It has also avoided CO2 and environmental pollution.
Energy conservation research is only funded at $306 million this
year at DOE, which is low considering the massive amounts of
energy production that are being saved by conservation.
Regulations on efficiency work, but voluntary efforts lag far
behind.
Much has been done, but much more can be done
In this new era of global warming and high energy costs and
energy shortages, the public must be informed and politicians
sought who are sensitive to these issues.