Operational Effectiveness and Strategy - Final
Operational Effectiveness and Strategy - Final
Strategy?
By Michael E. Porter
Positive side
Leaner and nimble process
Lower costs
Superior quality
How can we delivering greater value or create comparable value at a lower cost?
Process improvement (create, produce, sell and delivering products and services)
Cost reduction (performing activities more efficiently than competitors)
Management tools and techniques ( best practice improvement)
Strategy management
Strategy position (performing similar activities in different ways or performing similar activities
in different ways)
Issues
According to Porter most companies today compete on the basis of operational effectiveness and they forget
to develop strategies
2016 Ibat College | Strategy Management
Strategy
Doing things differently to deliver value compared to rivals. Doing different activities from rivals or performing
similar activities in different ways.
The essence of strategy is choosing to perform activities differently than rivals do. (Michael E. Porter)
Strategy position
Strategy position can be based on different aspects:
customers needs
customers accessibility
variety of a companys products or services
Variety-based positioning
Needs-based positioning
It arises when there are a group of customers with different needs, and
when a tailored set of activities can serve those needs
Access-based positioning
Deliver another kind of value may reduce credibility of companies and confuse customers.
Requires different management, people and systems
First-order
fit
Secondorder fit
Third-order
fit
Simple consistency between each activity (function) and the overall strategy. Consistency ensures that the competitive
advantages of activities cumulate and do not erode or cancel themselves out. Further, consistency makes it easier to
communicate the strategy to customers, employees, and shareholders, and improves implementation through singlemindedness in the corporation.
Ex: Vanguard
Goes beyond activity reinforcement to what Porter refers to as optimization of effort. Coordination and information
exchange across activities to eliminate redundancy and minimize wasted effort are the most basic types of effort
optimization
Ex: GAP
In all three types of fit, the whole matters more than any individual part Competitive advantage systems from the
activities of the entire system
2016 Ibat College | Strategy Management
Strategic fit among many activities is more sustainable for some reasons:
It is harder for rival to imitate or replicate the activities;
The rivals will be forced to reconfigure their activities to imitate, thus they will spend money;
Companies with strong fit among their activities are rarely inviting targets
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
..?
9.
..?
Exploring
Figuring Out
? ?
Implementation
Checking