3.1 Complex Numbers Extra
3.1 Complex Numbers Extra
Introduction:
i
2
12 1 1
5
Examples:
9 3i
18 3 2 i
Powers of i:
i2 1
We have seen that
. It then
follows that
i 3 i 2 i 1
i i
i 4 i 2 i 2 ( 1)( 1) 1
i 5 i i 4 i 1 i
i 6 i 2 i 4 1 1 1
i 7 i 3 i 4 i 1 i
i 8 i 4 i 4 1 1 1
i, -1, -i, 1
If the exponent is a multiple of 4, the power equals 1.
For example,
i 24 1
27
243
24
i i i
3
(a) i 55
(b) i 62
(c) i 73
Complex numbers:
What if we want to combine a real number with
10
number
2 + 3i . Note that the tip of the vector has
coordinates (2, 3).
Operations:
Addition example:
(2 4 i) (3 i)
(2 3) (4 i i)
5 3i
Subtraction example:
(2 4 i) (3 i)
2 4i 3 i
(2 3) (4i i)
1 5i
14
Operations:
(2 4 i)(3 i)
Multiplication example:
6 2i 12i 4i2
6 1 0i 4 ( 1)
6 4 10i
10 10i
calculation.
15
5 i
2 3i
numbers
and
16
i
i
to eliminate the i in the
can multiple by
denominator, as is seen in this example:
1
1 i
i
i
i
i i
1
(a b )(a b ) a
difference of squares:
18
5 2i
Division example:
3 4i
5 2i 3 4i
3 4i 3 4i
15 20i 6i 8i2
25
23 14
i
2
5
2
5
Note that in the first step we multiplied both numerator
and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator.
In the last step, note how the fraction was split into two
pieces. This is because, technically speaking, a
complex number is expressed as a sum of two parts: a
+ bi.
To check this example on your calculator, enter
(5+2i)(3+4i) to get .92 - .56i. If you prefer fractions
19
over decimals, press MATH FRAC ENTER.
20
13,
17
b
i
b
the origin, and is denoted by
Note that this definition agrees with the
modulus
of 3 + 2i is less than the modulus of 4 + i.
You can check your answers on the
calculator using abs(a+ib), as seen in the
following example:
Select MATH NUM abs(3+2i) ENTER, giving
a decimal approximation to the square root
of 13. Since this number is irrational, you
cannot convert it to a fraction using FRAC.
22
(b) -5 + 12i
(c) 8 6i
23
Lesson 1 - Quiz
Try to answer each question twice,
without a calculator and then with
a calculator.
1.
2.
24
Lesson 1 - Quiz
3. Draw the vector representing 2-i .
4.
5.
25
Lesson 1 - Quiz
6.
7.
Introduction:
27
complex numbers
w = 1 + 2i , z = -2 + I , origin and w+z.
Is this a rectangle? a square?
29
30
32
a r cos ,
b r sin .
z a bi
r c o s ir sin
r c o s i sin
The expression
z 2cis45
typing:
1 + i ENTER. Of course, your MODE setting should
already be set to polar: re^
35
cos,
b r sin .
This gives
Thus,
a 2cos150
3andb 2sin150 1.
z 3 i
your calculator.
(a) Find the polar form of z = 4 3i.
(b) Find the standard form of z = 2 cis 225.
37
Geometric understanding of
multiplication
We now show that the product of two complex
38
De Moivres Theorem:
We can use the polar form to square a complex number:
z z cis nA
1 i 8
Example: Simplify
2.
The modulus
18 i 8 of 1 + i is
= 452 degrees.
cis(845)
Thus,
=
=
= 16 cis(360)
= 16
41
42
that
and we would
like to solve for w in terms of z. Writing the
n
n
w
i s n B equation,
z c is A
w
c
i
s
B
z
c
i
s
A
root of z is
n
A 360
z c is
180 360k
3
are 60, 180, and 300. Thus, the three cube roots of -8
are: 2 cis 60, 2 cis 180, and 2 cis 300, which are
simplified as:
3,
2,
corresponding to k = 0.
You can try to check these answers on your calculator,
but dont expect to get all three answers. The TI-84
seems to give a real answer, is there is one. If none of
the roots are real, the calculator gives the principal root.
Let us check this for the cube root of -8. Entering (8)^(1/3) produces an answer of -2, which is the real root
but not the principal root.
45
46
Lesson 2 - Quiz
1. Let
and
. Sketch the
parallelogram determined by
Also sketch the parallelogram determined
by
.
2. Find the polar from of
.
(a) 2 cis 120
(b) 2 cis 150
cis 210
(c) 2
Lesson 3: Applications
2a
49
negative.
However, there are zeros if we allow complex numbers.
We illustrate by an example.
x2 2x c 0
Example: Find the zeros of
, where c = 0, 1, 2.
In simple cases such as this, it is more convenient to find
x
roots, but two complex roots 1 i. The graph of the 2 x 2
parabola
50
lies above the x-axis and has no x-intercepts.
the three
equations and
the solutions.
Why the third
equation
doesnt have a
real solution?
Graphically,
can you
understand
whether or not
an equation
has a complex
root?
51
For x
52
Fundamental Theorem of
Algebra:
53
=
=
, and check
Further applications:
Engineers also use complex numbers in analyzing stresses and
engineers.
http://www.walter-fendt.de/m14e/complnum.htm
Addition And Subtraction Of Complex Numbers
http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~jgilbert/maths_site/applets/complex_numbers/addition_and_subtra
ction_of_complex_numbers_.html
Addition and Subtraction Of Complex Numbers
http://www.poisonapplet.com/complex_numbers/addition_and_subtraction/
Everything about Complex Numbers: http://www.poisonapplet.com/complex_numbers/
Another http://www.ies.co.jp/math/java/comp/index.html
http://www.poisonapplet.com/complex_numbers/
Multiplication And Division
http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~jgilbert/maths_site/applets/complex_numbers/multiplication_and_div
ision.html
De Moivre's Theorem
http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~jgilbert/maths_site/applets/complex_numbers/de_moivre_s_theorem
.html
Conjugate Roots Theorem and plotting equations
http://www.netsoc.tcd.ie/~jgilbert/maths_site/applets/complex_numbers/conjugate_roots_theo
rem.html
Quiz:
http://www.glencoe.com/sec/math/studytools/cgi-bin/msgQuiz.php4?isbn=0-07-827999-2&c
57
hapter=5&lesson=9&headerFile=10&state=na
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/xaos/win
xaos31.pre3.zip
http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/julia/explorer
.html
http://www.angelfire.com/art2/fractals/bestp
Fractals
The mathematics behind fractals are incredibly interesting and captivating. You need to have a grasp on
algebra and some complex number background is preferable. We already described how fractals are
created through applying functions, but never explained any functions and how they work. In this
section, we will describe the two most popular fractal sets and how they work, the Julia set and the
Mandelbrot set.
To understand fractals, you need to understand complex numbers. Complex numbers are a way to put
two coordinates (x,y) into one number with two parts. One is a real number, which is any regular
number like 3, 8.5, or 12/45. The other is an imaginary number, which is defined as the square root of a
negative number, and is characterized by i (defined as i^2=-1, therefore i=sqrt -1) times a
coefficient.When you take a number and square it, it always becomes positive. So how do you take the
square root of a negative number? You can't, that's why it's called imaginary. So, complex numbers are
made up of a real number plus an imaginary number. Examples include (1+.343i), (pi+343.6i), and
(0+3i). Complex numbers are used in fractals because the real number is used to represent the x
coordinate, and the complex number is used to represent the y coordinate. So, if the computer wanted
to iterate (3,8), it would apply the function to (3+8i). This way, the function is dealing with a number to
which most of the mathematical properties such as the associative and distributive laws can be applied,
instead of a set of x and y coordinates. It is important to note that the complex coordinates are not the
same coordinates of the pixel they represent. Pixel coordinates are always from 0 to the bounds of the
screen, usually something like (786, 233). The range we use depends on the fractal, but it is usually
something like x: -3 to 3; y: -2 to 2. Therefore, to apply the function to a pixel, we divide the units into
hundreds of tiny segments, and the computers deal with the tiny fractions.
We must also set a limit of iteration on our fractal. Since the points inside the Mandelbrot set never
leave the screen, we will iterate our function forever if we wait for them to leave our circle. To get
around this, we set a limit on the number of times we will iterate it. If the point is still in our circle after
that many iterations, we assume it is part of the set. The more iterations we use, the more exact and
detailed our image will be, but the longer it will take to generate. When we have done this with every
pixel, we have a fractal. Other equations than this one produce different fractals. Mandelbrot sets are
60