CML and SML are models for calculating expected returns of risky assets. CML uses total risk measured by standard deviation to calculate expected return, while SML uses systematic risk measured by Beta. Both models assume a risk-free asset and calculate whether securities are overvalued or undervalued based on their expected returns. The key differences are that CML graphs expected return against total risk on the x-axis, while SML graphs it against Beta, and CML uses the Sharpe ratio for the slope while SML uses the Treynor ratio.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views
CML Vs SML: Facts Sheet
CML and SML are models for calculating expected returns of risky assets. CML uses total risk measured by standard deviation to calculate expected return, while SML uses systematic risk measured by Beta. Both models assume a risk-free asset and calculate whether securities are overvalued or undervalued based on their expected returns. The key differences are that CML graphs expected return against total risk on the x-axis, while SML graphs it against Beta, and CML uses the Sharpe ratio for the slope while SML uses the Treynor ratio.