CHAP12
CHAP12
MACROECONOMICS
N. Gregory Mankiw
Context
! Chapter 10 introduced the model of aggregate
demand and supply.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
r
L
M
r1
Y1
The intersection determines
the unique combination of Y and r
that satisfies equilibrium in both markets.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
IS
Y
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
IS
Y1
r
L
M
r
2
.
Aggregate Demand II
1
.
Y1 Y2
3.
IS2
IS1
Y
A tax cut
Consumers save (1MPC)
of the tax cut, so the
initial boost in spending is
smaller for T than for
an equal G
and the IS curve shifts by
r
L
M
r2
2.
1
.
1
.
2.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Y1
Y2
2.
IS2
IS1
LM
1
r2
3. which increases
investment, causing
output & income to
rise.
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM
IS
Y1 Y 2
Interaction between
monetary &
fiscal
policy
! Model:
! Monetary & fiscal policy
variables (M, G, and T ) are
exogenous.
! Real world:
! Monetary policymakers may adjust M
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
constant
2. hold rconstant
3. hold Y
constant
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Response 1: Hold M
consta
nt
r
If Congress raises G,
the IS curve shifts right.
LM
1
r
2
IS2
IS1
Y1
Y2
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Response 2: Holdconsta
r
nt
r
If Congress raises G,
the IS curve shifts right.
LM
1
r
2
IS2
IS1
Y1 Y2
Y3
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM
To keep Y constant,
Fed reduces M
to shift LM curve left.
LM
2
LM
If Congress raises G,
the IS curve shifts right.
r
3
r
2
Results:
IS2
IS1
r
1
Y1
Y2
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
Assumption about
monetary policy
Estimated
value of
Y / G
Estimated
value of
Y / T
0.60
0.26
1.93
1.19
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
NOW YOU
TRY
Analyze
shocks
model
Use the IS-LM model to analyze the effects of
1. a housing market crash that
reduces consumers wealth
2. consumers using cash in transactions more
frequently in response to an increase in
identity theft
ANSWERS, PART 1
to
r
LM
1
r1
r2
IS2
Y2 Y1
IS1
Y
18
ANSWERS, PART 2
LM
LM
1
r2
r1
IS1
Y2 Y1
19
CASE
STUDY:
The U.S.
recessionof
2001
2.1 million jobs lost,
!
During 2001:
!
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE STUDY:
1,200
900
600
300
1995
CHAPTER 12
1996
1997
1998
Aggregate Demand II
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
CASE
STUDY:
The U.S.
recessionof 2001
Causes: 2) 9/11
! increased uncertainty
! fall in consumer & business confidence
lower spending, IS curve shifted left
! result:
Causes: 3) Corporate accounting scandals
! Enron, WorldCom, etc.
! reduced stock prices, discouraged investment
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CASE
STUDY:
The U.S.
recessionof 2001
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
1/2
00
3
01
/01
/20
04
00
/02
/
07 2000
/03
/20
10
00
/03
/
01 2000
/03
/2 0
04
01
/05
/20
07
/06 01
/20
10
01
/06
/
01 2001
/06
/20
04
02
/08
/
07 2002
/09
/2 0
10
02
/09
/
01 2002
/09
/20
03
04
/1
CASE STUDY:
CHAPTER 12
Three-month
T-Bill rate
Aggregate Demand II
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
LM(P2)
LM(P1)
r2
r1
IS
P
Y2
Y1
P2
r
I
Y
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
AD
P1
Y2
Y1
Y
each
r2
IS
P
at
LM(M2/P1)
r1
r
I
LM(M1/P1)
Y1
Y2
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
P1
value of
P
CHAPTER 12
Y1
Aggregate Demand II
LM
r2
IS2
agg. demand:
r1
T C
IS shifts right
Y
at each
value
of P
CHAPTER 12
Y1
Y2
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
P1
Y1
Aggregate Demand II
IS1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
A negative IS shock
shifts IS and AD left,
causing Y to fall.
LRAS LM(P )
1
IS2
IS1
Y
LRAS
SRAS1
P
1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
IS1
Y
LRAS
SRAS1
P
1
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
Aggregate Demand II
IS1
Y
LRAS
SRAS1
P
1
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
Y
P
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS
SRAS1
SRAS2
P
2
CHAPTER 12
IS1
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(P )
1
LM(P2)
IS2
Y
P
SRAS1
SRAS2
Aggregate Demand II
LRAS
P
P
CHAPTER 12
IS1
AD1
AD2
Y
LRAS LM(M /P
1
1
IS
P
P
LRAS
SRAS1
AD1
Y
37
ANSWERS, PART 1
Short-run effects of M
r
LRAS
LM(M1/P1)
LM(M2/P1
)
r1
r2
IS
Y2
P
P
1
LRAS
SRAS
AD2
AD1
Y2 Y
38
ANSWERS, PART 2
Over time,
! P rises
! SRAS moves upward
! M/P falls
! LM moves leftward
New long-run eqm
! P higher
! all real variables back at
their initial values
Money is neutral in the
long run.
LRAS
LM(M12/P13)
LM(M2/P1
)
r3 1
= r r2
Y2
P
IS
Y
LRAS
SRAS
P
P
1
SRAS
Y2
AD2
AD1
Y
39
220
30
25
200
20
180
15
160
10
Real GNP
(left
scale)
140
120
1929
1931
1933
1935
1937
5
0
1939
240
UNTABLE 12.1
Mankiw: Macroeconomics, Eighth Edition
Copyright 2012 by Worth Publishers
THE SPENDING
HYPOTHESIS:
Shocks to
the IS curve
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
THE SPENDING
HYPOTHESIS:
Reasonsfor the
IS shift
! Drop in investment
! Correction after overbuilding in the 1920s.
! Widespread bank failures made it harder to obtain
financing for investment.
Aggregate Demand II
THE MONEY
HYPOTHESIS:
A shock to
the LM curve
! Evidence:
M1 fell 25% during 192933.
Aggregate Demand II
prices
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
prices
! Pigou effect:
P
(M/P )
consumers wealth
C
IS shifts right
CHAPTER 12
Aggregate Demand II
prices
CHAPTER 12
I because I = I (r )
Aggregate Demand II
prices
Aggregate Demand II
CHAPTER
12 Aggregateduring
Demandan
II
expansionary
economic downturn.
CASE
STUDY
The 200809 financial crisis &
recession
factors
in the
2009: Real
GDP
fell, crisis:
u-rate approached
!! Important
early
2000s
Federal
!
10%
170
7
6
150
130
4
110
3
90
2
70
1
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
50
2005
10%
1.2
8%
1.0
6%
0.8
4%
2%
0.6
0%
0.4
-2%
0.2
-4%
-6%
1999
0.0
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
12%
New foreclosures,
% of all mortgages
Nevada
Florida
Illinois
Michigan
Ohio
California
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Rhode Island
New
Jersey
H
a
w
a
ii
Texa
s
S. Dakota
Oregon
Alaska
Wyoming
N. Dakota
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
12/28/200
1
9/5/2002
5/14/2003
1/20/2004
9/27/2004
6/5/2005
2/11/2006
11/11/2008
7/20/2009
DJIA
3/5/2008
S&P 500
6/28/2007
NASDAQ
10/20/200
6
4/21/2001
8/13/2000
120%
140%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
-60%
-80%
12/6/1999
110
15%
10%
100
5%
90
0%
80
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
70
Durables
60
Investment
UM
Consumer
-25%
1999 Sentiment
Index
20002001
2002 2003
2004 2005
50
2006 2007 2008 2009
10
10
6
6
4
2
4
0
-2
-4
-6
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
0
2011
% of labor force
CHAPT ER
Y
SUMMAR
1. IS-LM model
! endogenous:
Y
! IS
! LM
r,
in
CHAPT ER
Y
SUMMAR
2. AD curve
I Y
curve.
58