This document discusses entrepreneurial work styles and management styles. It covers Kolb's model of experiential learning and different learning styles. It also discusses Peter Drucker's view that innovation needs to be managed systematically. Different management orientations are discussed, including structure, people, and change. Various management styles are outlined such as structured, delegative, standards, merit, and supportive. Leadership styles like directive, paternalistic, normative, and innovative are also covered. The document concludes with assessing teamwork ability.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
338 views
Entrep Behavior Chapter 8
This document discusses entrepreneurial work styles and management styles. It covers Kolb's model of experiential learning and different learning styles. It also discusses Peter Drucker's view that innovation needs to be managed systematically. Different management orientations are discussed, including structure, people, and change. Various management styles are outlined such as structured, delegative, standards, merit, and supportive. Leadership styles like directive, paternalistic, normative, and innovative are also covered. The document concludes with assessing teamwork ability.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15
Entrepreneurial Behavior
Chapter 8 Entrepreneurial Work Style Entrepreneurial Work Style
* as there is no one entrepreneurial
personality and people have different styles of learning so too are there different management and leadership styles that vary between particular entrepreneurs, in their particular firms facing their own particular set circumstances. 1. David Kolbs model (1973) suggests that entrepreneurial success should be mainly determined by the individuals ability to adapt and dominate continual changes in the business environment through exploring new opportunities and learning from past successes and mistakes. Experiential Learning Cycle * the cycle starts with a concrete experience (activist); moves on to the stage of observation and reflection (reflector) on what has happened and why; then onto making sense of what has happened in the form of rule or guide for repeating successes or avoiding similar mistakes (theorist); and finally, setting up a new situation to test the new insights or rules (pragmatist) Kolbs Learning Style 1. Diverger able to see concrete experience from different perspectives and to pull different meanings from experience. They are people who tend to this style of learning as inventive and creative. 2. Assimilator attracted to creating models and concepts, an approach that would be a strength in consultant and marketing firms. 3. Converger prefers to apply rules and to test them. A style that appeals to engineers and technical people, it is useful in innovations based on R & D. 4. Accomodators at ease in working with with other people. They like to plan and carry out new activities, they are more prepared to accept risks and this may be the most entrepreneurial learning style. Assessment 6 Learning Styles
1. Which style best reflects your own?
2. Where would you place yourself on Kolbs grid? 3. What sort of balance of learning styles do you think would best fit your needs? 2. Peter Drucker (1985) he maintains that innovation no longer results from chance activities but needs to be managed whether in a big or small firm as an organized and systematic process. This suggest that preferred learning styles will be directly related to the learning and skills needs perceived at the time and where they work in the enterprise value- cycle. Thus, learning styles are also likely to be linked to preferred management and leadership styles. Three broad Management Orientation
1. Structure organizational and bureaucratic
2. People social and motivational 3. Change entrepreneurial and innovative
*management styles reflect the influences of the
management orientation ( the requirements of where they manage in the value chain and individual personality).
Two main categories used to distinguish the main
approaches: 1. Task- focused 2. People - focused Five broad management behavioral styles
1. Structured rules and procedures
2. Delegative happy for the subordinates to take some direct responsibility for their own work 3. Standards set or agree quality and performance standards 4. Merit praise and reward good work 5. Supportive helpful and enjoy the teams trust Leadership Styles 1. Directive style - firm owners suggest that most like to see themselves in command 2. Paternalistic style or participative style growth-oriented small firms that have a history of growth, are more likely to see themselves as being one happy family 3. Normative style firms that are governed by external rules and procedures 4. Innovative style task focus and generally have a structured management style Assessment 9 Teamwork Ability 1. Was there a lack of shared common purposes (even if not well articulated? 2. Did group members fail to communicate with each other? 3. Were many decisions taken spontaneously without full discussion? 4. Did some types of people dominate more than others? 5. Did some group members criticize but fail to participate in the decisions? 6. Did group members seem dissatisfied that their views and strengths were not paid due respect? 7. Were members unclear about their own roles or tasks in the group? 8. Did group members exhibit low commitment? 9. Did group members lack opportunities to the learn the appropriate skills to participate fully? 10.Did you personally find it difficult to influence the decisions or discussions of the group? end of session