COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA TENDER EVALUATION

EVALUATION STAGES -JKR PROCEDURE
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 1

 COURSE OUTCOME
COURSE OUTCOME Enable to understand the tender
OBJECTIVES evaluation process.
EVALUATION PROCESS Knowledge on tender evaluation
stages and the criteria involved.
CRITERIA
Enable to know all information
EVALUATION STAGES
needed during tender.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
Enable to strategize work during
OTHERS ANALYSIS tender stages.
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 2

 OBJECTIVES
COURSE OUTCOME To determine and to recommend to
OBJECTIVES the Board of Procurement a tender
EVALUATION PROCESS
which offers the most profit to the
GOVERNMENT. Only contractor
CRITERIA
which has the financial and technical
EVALUATION STAGES capabilities is eligible for Award and
SPECIAL CRITERIA Acceptance.
OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 3

 EVALUATION PROCESS
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT
Tender evaluation must be done in validity of tender period
(minimum 90 days) from tender closing date.

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 4

 EVALUATION PROCESS
FIRST STAGE
Tender price adjustment

Arrange the tender price

COURSE OUTCOME (from low to high)

Price reasonableness based

on budget or cut-off
OBJECTIVES
Determine the number of
tenderers to be evaluated
EVALUATION PROCESS
qualify Not Fulfill requirement
CRITERIA
SECOND STAGE
Tender compliance
EVALUATION STAGES
Tender compliance analysis Not Fulfill requirement
Rejected Contractor
Completeness of document analysis
SPECIAL CRITERIA
Adequacy of minimum capital
analsys
OTHERS ANALYSIS
qualify Not Fulfill requirement
ENDORSEMENT
THIRD STAGE
Experience and capability
TENDER REPORT
Tenderer experience analysis

Technical personnel analysis

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 5

 CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME PWD practice tender evaluation
OBJECTIVES
procedure has been divided into 3
categories, namely:
EVALUATION PROCESS
i. Large projects (more than RM10.0 million)
CRITERIA ii. Medium projects (RM2.0 million to RM10.0
EVALUATION STAGES
million)
iii. Small projects (less than RM2.0 million)
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 6

 CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
COURSE OUTCOME
INFORMATION FORMS
OBJECTIVES
a) Borang A Surat pengakuan kebenaran
EVALUATION PROCESS maklumat dan kesahihan
dokumen yang dikemukakan
pentender
CRITERIA
a) Borang B Maklumat am latarbelakang pentender
b) Borang C Data-data kewangan
EVALUATION STAGES c) Borang CA Laporan Bank/Institusi Kewangan
d) Borang D Rekod pengalaman kerja
SPECIAL CRITERIA e) Borang E Kakitangan teknikal
f) Borang F Keempunyaan loji dan peralatan
OTHERS ANALYSIS pembinaan asas
g) Borang G Senarai kontrak kerja semasa
ENDORSEMENT h) Borang GA-1 Laporan Jurutera Projek (JKR)
i) Borang GA-2 Laporan Jurutera Projek (Swasta)
TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 7

 CRITERIA
- INFORMATION REQUIRED
COURSE OUTCOME OTHERS DOCUMENT
OBJECTIVES
i. Audited account copy for last 2 years
ii. Account bank statement copy for last 3 months
EVALUATION PROCESS
iii. Bank report / financial institution (sealed)
CRITERIA iv. Copy of the certificate / confirmation of completion for
each project listed in Form D and G
EVALUATION STAGES v. EPF statement and a copy of Form A or copy service
agreement for contract staff
SPECIAL CRITERIA vi. Copy of the certificate of approval of technical staff
vii. Copy of Grant / hire-purchase agreement plant /
OTHERS ANALYSIS equipment
viii. Copies of the final interim payment certificate for the
ENDORSEMENT current project
ix. Project report (sealed)
TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 8

 Sample of summary of tender submission

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 9

 EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
Preparation need to be done by
OBJECTIVES evaluator before start any tender
EVALUATION PROCESS evaluation process such as:
CRITERIA Prepare summary of tender in ascending order
based on tender table prepared by Tender
EVALUATION STAGES Opening Committee.
. Prepare tender analysis based on cut-off pricing.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
. Select list of tenderers to be evaluated.
OTHERS ANALYSIS . Check and fill up Checklist of Compulsory
Documents.
ENDORSEMENT
. Prepare analysis of percentage (%) of price
TENDER REPORT distribution and obtain agreement from tenderers.
. Carry out arithmetic checking.
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 10
 EVALUATION STAGES
- FIRST STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME Number of tenderer should be assessed is
OBJECTIVES
between 15-20 tenderer to produce between 3-
5 tenderer who will pass.
EVALUATION PROCESS
"Range" of tenderer can be selected is between
CRITERIA + / - 20% (+ / - 25% for Civil Engineering) from
the Mean Price.
EVALUATION STAGES
For the tenderers who are below the "cut-off"
SPECIAL CRITERIA will be checked the compulsory document first.
Select tenderer with special criteria to be
OTHERS ANALYSIS evaluated.
ENDORSEMENT For tenderers who are outside the cut-off to be
referred to tender committee for consideration.
TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 11

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME A system of evaluation based on predetermined
conditions to ascertain whether tenderers are
OBJECTIVES eligible for further evaluation.

EVALUATION PROCESS Evaluation Criteria:

i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
CRITERIA ii. Analysis on Completeness of tender
documents.
EVALUATION STAGES iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Capital
iv. Analysis on performance of current work.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
Objectives:
OTHERS ANALYSIS To ensure tenders under consideration are
reasonable, in compliance, complete, have
ENDORSEMENT adequate capital and have good current work
performance free from sick project,
TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 12

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
i. Analysis on Compliance to Tender
OBJECTIVES Only Tenderers which comply and free from any
imperfection in term of legal and contractual which may
EVALUATION PROCESS jeopardize their qualification based on current practice are
to be considered.
CRITERIA To check if form of tender has been signed by
tenderers
EVALUATION STAGES The signing person has been given the power to sign.
To check if tender price is stated in the form of tender.
SPECIAL CRITERIA
Are PKK/CIDB registration still valid.
OTHERS ANALYSIS Has tenderer returned all the basic tender documents,
Check proposed construction period is stated in the
ENDORSEMENT form of tender.
Failure to submit any of the forms of tender may effect
TENDER REPORT the ranking of tenderer,

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 13

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Common mistakes during filling of forms of
COURSE OUTCOME tender
OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES
FORM OF TENDER
NOT SIGNED
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017
FORM OF TENDER NOT SIGNED
NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 14
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

SIGNED ON WRONG FORM

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 15
 Summary of Tender Price

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS
TENDER PRICE

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 16

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS VALIDITY PERIOD

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA AHMAD BIN ABU

OTHERS ANALYSIS SIGNING PERSON

GIVEN POWER
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

SIJIL PKK
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 17
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA
VALIDITY PERIOD

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

CIDB CERTIFICATE
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 18
 FORM OF TENDER

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA
CONTRACT PERIOD
NOT STATED
EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS TENDER PRICE

NOT STATED

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 19

 FORM OF TENDER

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES
PRICE IN WORDS
SPECIAL CRITERIA
PRICE IN
OTHERS ANALYSIS FIGURES

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 20

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES a) Tender which is complete and comply to the
requirement of tender/regulation/Authority.
EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA b) Mandatory Tender Documents includes:

i. Forms of Tender
EVALUATION STAGES ii. List of Quantity/ Summary of Tender
iii. Addendum (if any)
SPECIAL CRITERIA
iv. Schedule of rates
OTHERS ANALYSIS v. Design proposal, specification, pricing by
contractor etc. (where applicable) as required
ENDORSEMENT
to enable design work by tenderer to be
TENDER REPORT evaluated.

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 21

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
OTHERS - Analysis on Construction Period
OBJECTIVES
Ensure the construction period offers by tenderers is
EVALUATION PROCESS analysed such as:

CRITERIA a) not exceeding the maximum construction period

stated in the tender document.
EVALUATION STAGES b) Construction period if offerred by tenderer is not
too short that it becomes unreasonable
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 22

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Analysis on Completeness of Tender
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 23

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES
MANDATORY DOCUMENTS
EVALUATION PROCESS a) Audited account copy for last 2 years, or
Account bank statement copy for last 3 months, or
CRITERIA Bank report / financial institution (sealed)

EVALUATION STAGES
b) Project report by project superintendence officer
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS Without mandatory documents

(especially regarding financial)
ENDORSEMENT
evaluation of tenders can not be made
TENDER REPORT and therefore tender will be rejected.

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 24

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Balance Sheet statement
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 25

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
Current Bank Statement
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 26

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME Financial Statement Report

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 27

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
ii. Analysis on Completeness of Tender
OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 28

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital

OBJECTIVES
Method of calculation
EVALUATION PROCESS i. Rolling capital = asset liability current liability
ii. Bank account = average of latest 3 months
CRITERIA
iii. Make comparison between rolling capital and
EVALUATION STAGES bank account. Select the higher amount
iv. Include credit facilities report
SPECIAL CRITERIA
v. Add (+) iii and iv = total liquidated capital (>3%)
OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 29

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital

OBJECTIVES Sample of calculation for minimum capital 3%

from value of construction work.
EVALUATION PROCESS
Tender price = RM 1,000,000.00
CRITERIA
PC Sum = RM 50,000.00
EVALUATION STAGES Provisional Sum = RM 50,000.00
SPECIAL CRITERIA Construction work value = RM 900,000.00

OTHERS ANALYSIS
So, 3% = RM 27,000.00
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT
MINIMA CAPITAL
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 30
 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME iii. Analysis on Adequacy of Minimum Capital

OBJECTIVES
Forms of Capital
EVALUATION PROCESS a) Rolling capital
CRITERIA b) Shares, unit trust, fixed deposit, Bond
c) Balance of credit facilities
EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA For joint venture tender submission, minimum

capital is analyse based on combined
OTHERS ANALYSIS
equity agreed by both parties.
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 31

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
Adequacy of Minimum Capital
OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 32

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
iii. Analysis on performance of current work
OBJECTIVES
Work still on progress during the tendering
EVALUATION PROCESS process (Form D, G and GA)
CRITERIA
No sick project below 30% of work schedule
No termination record
EVALUATION STAGES
Checking will carry out through;
SPECIAL CRITERIA i. PKK / CIDB / JKR scale
ii. Superintendence project report
OTHERS ANALYSIS
iii. T.K.S. if no project on hand.
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 33

 Current progress report

COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 34

 EVALUATION STAGES
- SECOND STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 35

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME REASONABLE FACTORS
Faktor Civil Building Mechancal /
OBJECTIVES
Enginering work Electrical
EVALUATION PROCESS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial capability 45% 50% 50%
CRITERIA Technical
Work experience 35% 35% 35%
EVALUATION STAGES Technical staffs 15% 10% 15%
Machineries / plant 5% 5% 0%
SPECIAL CRITERIA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
OTHERS ANALYSIS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 36

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
i. Financial Capability
OBJECTIVES
FINANCIAL CAPABILITY (Financial Bid Capacity)
EVALUATION PROCESS
= Working capital
CRITERIA
Yearly project value
EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 37

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
ii. Technical
OBJECTIVES
Working experiences
EVALUATION PROCESS Technical staff
Machineries / plant
CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES Working experience

SPECIAL CRITERIA
Evaluation criteria
OTHERS ANALYSIS -. Completed total work value past 5 years
ENDORSEMENT
- Largest work value done in past 5 years
- Type of work is limited to recognized work
TENDER REPORT Comparable or similar (follow by head / sub-head

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 38

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
Technical staff
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES Evaluation criteria

-. Number and working experience of technical staff
EVALUATION PROCESS
compares with Estimate Minimum Requirement
CONSTRUCTION WORK VALUE BUILDING CIVIL ENGINEERING
CRITERIA
CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT CAT
EVALUATION STAGES A B C A B C
More than RM5.0 m and not more 1 3 3 2 3 4
SPECIAL CRITERIA than RM 8.0 m

More than RM8.0 m and not more 2 4 4 3 4 5

OTHERS ANALYSIS than RM 15.0 m

More than RM15.0 m and not more 3 7 7 5 7 9

ENDORSEMENT than RM 25.0 juta

More than RM25.0 m and not more

TENDER REPORT than RM 50.0 m 5 11 11 8 11 14

More than RM50.0 m 8 18 18 13 19 23

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 39

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE

COURSE OUTCOME
Technical staff
OBJECTIVES
Staff categories:
Category A (Engineer, architect, quantity surveyor)
EVALUATION PROCESS
Category B (Diploma, Technician / polytechnic)
CRITERIA Category C (assistant technician))

EVALUATION STAGES Must be employed by employer during tendering

Certificate and KWSP
SPECIAL CRITERIA For contract staff Contract agreement

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 40

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE

COURSE OUTCOME Machineries / plants

OBJECTIVES Plant and equipment that could be accounted is limited

to:
EVALUATION PROCESS As listed in the Estimated Minimum Requirement. Plants /
machineries can be considered if function equivalently
CRITERIA Owned / hire-purchase before the closing of tender
Useful life not exceeding 150 years
EVALUATION STAGES
If rent-mortgage, the agreement should cover the contract
period.
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 41

 EVALUATION STAGES
- THIRD STAGE
COURSE OUTCOME
Minimum Score
OBJECTIVES
Criteria Minimum Score
EVALUATION PROCESS
BW CE M&E
CRITERIA
1. Financial capability 20.0 18.0 20.0
EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA 2. Technical capability 12.5 13.8 12.5

OTHERS ANALYSIS
3. Overall capability 45.0 45.5 45.0
ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 42

 SPECIAL CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME Tender submission which is below the cut-
off price and passes Stage 2 Tender
OBJECTIVES
Evaluation can be considered if comply to
EVALUATION PROCESS the following criteria:
CRITERIA - Excellent performance for current project
and completed project for the last 5 years.
EVALUATION STAGES
- Good quality workmanship
SPECIAL CRITERIA
- Tender price not less than -20% of the
OTHERS ANALYSIS cut-off price
ENDORSEMENT - Tender price is not too unreasonable
TENDER REPORT (Freak).

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 43

 SPECIAL CRITERIA
COURSE OUTCOME Examples of low tender price can be
considered.
OBJECTIVES
- Own factory for main building materials
EVALUATION PROCESS
- Currently undertake equivalent
CRITERIA construction work at neighboring site
- Own scaffolding / formwork for recently
EVALUATION STAGES completed project
SPECIAL CRITERIA - For roadwork / earthwork own plants
and machineries readily available for use
OTHERS ANALYSIS
- Satisfactorily completed 3 projects of
ENDORSEMENT similar nature consecutively prior to this
tender
TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 44

 OTHERS ANALYSIS
COURSE OUTCOME Arithmetic checking
Table for price comparison
OBJECTIVES
- comparison of price for every building
EVALUATION PROCESS
category with the estimated price
CRITERIA prepared by consultant by each
tenderer taking into account the
EVALUATION STAGES
arithmetic checking
SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 45

 OTHERS ANALYSIS
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 46

 COMMITTEE ENDORSEMENT
FOR EVALUATION REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME Ensure tenderer is not too occupied with on
going project.
OBJECTIVES If the lowest tender price is too high as
compared to estimated mean price,
EVALUATION PROCESS
recommendation by committee should be:
CRITERIA Award the tender to the lowest tenderer
Decline all tender offer and re-tender.
EVALUATION STAGES
Recommendation should list down at least
SPECIAL CRITERIA five (5) tenderers in ascending order who had
passed each stage of evaluation.
OTHERS ANALYSIS Joint signature by qualified three (3) tender
ENDORSEMENT
committee members
Prepare Q14A/2005/A form for result of
TENDER REPORT tender together with complete tender
evaluation report
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 47
 TENDER EVALUATION
REPORT
COURSE OUTCOME Step to be undertaken if there is any fake documents
are detected.
OBJECTIVES
- check all submitted documents, and
EVALUATION PROCESS verify in compulsory document checklist.
- Check with the parties which is
CRITERIA responsible to supply the document. (if
EVALUATION STAGES
suspicious arise)
- Verification of fake document should be
SPECIAL CRITERIA in writing.
- Ensure the affected tenderer not to be
OTHERS ANALYSIS
recommended
ENDORSEMENT - Lodge a police report and send the report to
CIDB and PKK.
TENDER REPORT
- Evaluation officer to request show cause letter
from tenderer via CIDB and PKK
13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 48
COURSE OUTCOME

OBJECTIVES

Thank You
EVALUATION PROCESS

CRITERIA

EVALUATION STAGES

SPECIAL CRITERIA

OTHERS ANALYSIS

ENDORSEMENT

TENDER REPORT

13 September 2017 NURUL ASRA ABD RAHMAN 49