Collection AND Presentation of Data
Collection AND Presentation of Data
AND
PRESENTATION
OF DATA
Researchers in any field
should follow the scientific
process of collecting data to
arrive at valid and reliable
results. They may utilize
various instruments and
methods in collecting data,
but they use similar research
design in selecting the most
appropriate for their study.
THE NINE (9) TYPES OF
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH
1. DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH
2. DESCRIPTIVE-NORMATIVE
3. DESCRIPTIVE-ANALYSIS
4. DESCRIPTIVE-STATUS
5. DESCRIPTIVE-CLASSIFICATION
6. DESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATE
7. DESCRIPTIVE-COMPARATIVE
8. CORRELATION SURVEY
9. LONGITUDINAL SURVEY
EXAMPLES
1. CORRELATION JOB-RELATED
PROBLEMS AND JOB-RELATED
PERFORMANCE OF PROFESSORS IN
STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES
IN REGION VI (WESTERN VISAYAS)
FOR EXAMPLE:
The test in mathematics is “How many
meters are there in one (1) kilometer?”
Of the 100 students on mathematics
10 percent said that there are 1000
meters in one kilometer.
THE ANSWER IS CORRECT AND VALID
But from the previous example 90
percent answered that there are 950
meters in one kilometer.
THEIR ANSWER IS INCORRECT BUT
RELIABLE BECAUSE IT IS
CONSISTENT.
THEREFORE, A RELIABLE TEST IS
NOT ALWAYS VALID.
TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
=
=2.6
For item number 18
f X fX
4 3 12
1 2 2
Total:5 14
=
=2.8
From the above example of
questionnaire all items will be retained
because the weighted mean value
ranged from 2.6 to 3 when validated by
the experts
WHAT IS REALIBILITY?
Consistency of information
The information can be both reliable
and valid but sometimes the
information is correct although it is
consistent.
If that is the case a test may be
reliable but not valid or it can be
both valid and reliable.
MOST COMMON METHOD OF
TESTING THE REALIBILITY OF A
GOOD RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
The most common methods in testing
the reliability of a good research
instrument are:
1. Test-retest method
2. Product form method
3. Split-half method
4. Internal-consistency method
TEST-RETEST METHOD
get .
STEP 5: Add the squared difference to
get .
STEP 6: Compute the Spearman rho
using the formula.
For example:
INSTRUCTORS AND
PROFESSORS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
PERFORMANCE
OUTSTANDING
15 8.33
VERY SATISFACTORY
80 44.44
SATISFACORY
55 30.56
FAIRLY
30 16.67
SATISFACTORY
3. BOX HEADS
INSTRUCTORS AND
PROFESSORS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
PERFORMANCE
OUTSTANDING
15 8.33
VERY SATISFACTORY
80 44.44
SATISFACORY
55 30.56
FAIRLY
30 16.67
SATISFACTORY