Scribd
Upload
44 views19 pages

FKM Progress Presentation June 2016

This document summarizes a student's project on dynamic model updating of a car body-in-white (BIW) structure using finite element analysis. The objectives are to model the BIW structure, determine its dynamic properties experimentally and numerically, and perform model updating to minimize discrepancies. The student conducted a literature review on finite element model updating techniques and parameterization. Their methodology involves building an FE model in CATIA and MSC Nastran, performing experimental modal analysis using an impact hammer, and updating material and geometric properties to reduce differences between numerical and experimental modal analysis results.

Uploaded by

Iamzura Abdullah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views19 pages

FKM Progress Presentation June 2016

This document summarizes a student's project on dynamic model updating of a car body-in-white (BIW) structure using finite element analysis. The objectives are to model the BIW structure, determine its dynamic properties experimentally and numerically, and perform model updating to minimize discrepancies. The student conducted a literature review on finite element model updating techniques and parameterization. Their methodology involves building an FE model in CATIA and MSC Nastran, performing experimental modal analysis using an impact hammer, and updating material and geometric properties to reduce differences between numerical and experimental modal analysis results.

Uploaded by

Iamzura Abdullah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

DYNAMIC MODEL UPDATING OF

CAR BODY-IN-WHITE
PRESENTER:
NOOR AM ZURA BINTI ABDULLAH

STUDENT ID:
MMA 14003

MAIN SUPERVISOR
DR. MOHD. SHAHRIR B. MOHD. SANI

CO-SUPERVISOR:
PROFESSOR DR. MUSTAFIZUR RAHMAN
INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVES

LITERATURE REVIEW

METHODOLOGY

RESULTS

PROGRESS

CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION

• Create FE model for • Do not show same • Inaccurate


predicting the result when compared approximation of
structure’s to prediction of FEA structure's properties
performance • Manufacturing
• Importance of reliable variability during mass
FE model production

Design Fabricated Cause of


Process structure discrepancies
INTRODUCTION

BIW Assumption Discrepancies


Suggested
structure – of physical of dynamic
Difficulties in Simplification solution :
lots of joints, and material properties in
modeling in modeling Model
curves, properties of FEA and
updating
surface dents the structure experimental
INTRODUCTION (TERMINOLOGY)

A shell structure
composed of a
series of stressed
panels fixed
together that
support all the
vehicle
components like
doors,
Body-in-white (BIW) transmission, and
suspensions
INTRODUCTION (TERMINOLOGY)
Model updating technique

Improve the
Good FE model
correlation reliable to perform
between finite many different
element model types of analysis
and physical and modification
model by and capable of
correcting the providing almost
uncertainties accurate result to

Results
exist in FE model the real structure.
OBJECTIVES

To perform
experimental
To model BIW modal testing on To perform model
structure and BIW structure and updating to
determine its determine its minimize the
dynamic properties dynamic properties discrepancies
using Finite (natural frequency, between numerical
Element Analysis mode shapes and and experimental
(FEA) damping ratio) modal analysis
using impact
hammer test
LITERATURE SURVEY

Finite element Structural


method (FEM) modeling in FE

Experimental
Direct methods
modal analysis
Methods of Modal based
model updating method
Model updating
Iterative
in structural
methods
dynamics Parameterization
Response based
in model
method
updating
LITERATURE REVIEW
(FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING, TECHNIQUE AND
PARAMETERIZATION)

Zienkiewics & Taylor Schedlinski (2000) Zubair & Amin (2003)


(1994) • Study to present model validation • Two methods of model updating
study that integrates computational • Modal based correlation
• FE model updating as widely used
model updating technique – • Response based correlation
method to make a FE model
involving MATLAB based software
represent the dynamics of a
and MSC Nastran
structure accurately

J. Mottershead & Friswell, Mottershead, N. Hussain (2009-


Friswell (1993), Sinha Ahmadian (2001) 2011)
& Friswell (2003) • Deciding the way FE model of a •Model updating, damage detection on
structure to be parameterized and spot welded structure
• Problems of inaccuracies in FE •Application of perturbation method with
how to estimate the unknown
model that need updating to better parameter weighing matrix assignments
parameters from ill-condition
represent the actual structure for estimating variability
equation
•Problem of uncertainty due to
manufacturing
J.Mottershead & Friswell & J. Arora, Singh &
Friswell (2003) Mottershead (1995) Kundra ( 2009)
• Method od updating divided • Parameterisation for choice of • FE model updating
according to type of measured data updating parameter • Direct method
used and the modal parameter • Sensitivity method
updated
LITERATURE REVIEW
(FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING, TECHNIQUE AND
PARAMETERIZATION)

Friswell (2011) Terrell, Friswell, Esfandiari et.al (2010)


• Brief explanation on sensitivity Lieven (2007) • Response sensitivities related
method carried out on • Parameters obtained from to mass changes and stiffness
helicopter airframe structure generic element and parameters and indirectly
substructure transformation determined using the
decomposed form of FRF data

Nehete, Modak & Gladwell & Ahmadian Esfandiari (2010)


Gupta (2015) (2001) • Model updating algorithm to
• Using the concept used in • Effectiveness of paramterizing estimate structural parameter
sensitivity method, model the modes at the element level at element level
reduction technique applied in
model updating process

Modak (2014) Zapico-Valle et. Al Gollel et.al (2011)


• Study to identify limitation of (2010) • Demonstration of ill-
existing sensitivity method • Process of minimizing error conditioned inverse problems
function in time domain in high-dimensional parameter
space
METHODOLOGY
Process flow of model updating
procedure

Correct the
Using experimental properties
data on the finite
element
model

• Selected parameters
Experimental modal • Geometric parameters:
analysis (EMA) • Thickness
• Modal parameters: • Diameter
• Natural frequencies • Surface area
• Mode shapes • Material properties:
• Damping ratios • Density
• Young’s Modulus
METHODOLOGY
(FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS)
 Modelled in CATIA using
wireframe and surface workbench
 Imported to MSC.
NASTRAN/PATRAN
 30911 elements of tria shaped
element using hybrid mesher.

Properties Nominal Value


Young’s modulus 200 GPa
Material
Poisson ratio 0.3
properties
(Steel)
Density 7860 kg/m ᵌ
Shell properties Thickness 0.003 m
METHODOLOGY
(EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS)
– Equipment
• Impact hammer
• DAQ device
• Accelerometer
• Uni-axial
• Tri-axial
– Free-free condition
– Excitation method
• Impact hammer test
– Modal parameter extracted
using curve-fitting process
obtained FRF
RESULTS
(FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS MODE SHAPES)
RESULTS
(EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS)
RESULTS
(EXPERIMENTAL MODAL ANALYSIS)
NEXT STEP
IMPROVEMENT INCLUDE
ON FINITE ELEMENTS AND
ELEMENT PROPERTIES FOR
JOINTS
ANALYSIS DATA

VALIDATION
OF ROVING
ACCELEROMETER ROVING HAMMER
EXPERIMENTAL (DONE)
DATA

MODEL
UPDATING
PROCEDURE
CONCLUSION

The BIW structure has been successfully


modelled and some of the dynamic properties
of the structure still need to be determined

Impact hammer test has been performed on


BIW structure and validation is still in progress

Model updating to be carried out soon


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special gratitude to the Ministry of Higher


Education (MOHE) for providing the FRGS
fund for this study under RDU 130149.

Also to the supervisors for sharing their


knowledge and opinion during this study.

You might also like