0% found this document useful (0 votes)
261 views

Members in Compression

1) Column stability is governed by flexural buckling, local buckling, and lateral torsional buckling. Nominal compressive strength is calculated using the critical buckling stress. 2) Critical buckling stress depends on the effective length factor and the controlling mode of buckling. It is calculated using equations that consider the member's properties and boundary conditions. 3) Column design tables can be used to select columns based on required strength when the effective length is known. Otherwise, an iterative trial and error process is used to select a member based on calculations of the critical buckling stress.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
261 views

Members in Compression

1) Column stability is governed by flexural buckling, local buckling, and lateral torsional buckling. Nominal compressive strength is calculated using the critical buckling stress. 2) Critical buckling stress depends on the effective length factor and the controlling mode of buckling. It is calculated using equations that consider the member's properties and boundary conditions. 3) Column design tables can be used to select columns based on required strength when the effective length is known. Otherwise, an iterative trial and error process is used to select a member based on calculations of the critical buckling stress.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

Compression Members

COLUMN STABILITY

A. Flexural Buckling
• Elastic Buckling
• Inelastic Buckling
• Yielding
B. Local Buckling – Section E7 pp 16.1-39
and B4 pp 16.1-14
C. Lateral Torsional Buckling
AISC Requirements

CHAPTER E pp 16.1-32

Nominal Compressive Strength

Pn  Fcr Ag
AISC Eqtn E3-1
AISC Requirements

LRFD
Pu  c Pn

Pu  Sum of factored loads


c  resistance factor for compressio n  0.90

c Pn  design compressiv e strength


In Summary

 Fy
 KL E

 0.658 F 
e
Fy if  4.71

  r Fy



Fcr   or Fe  0.44 Fy




 0.877 Fe otherwise

KL
 200
r
In Summary - Definition of Fe

Fe: Elastic Buckling Stress corresponding to the controlling mode of


failure (flexural, torsional or flexural torsional)

Theory of Elastic Stability (Timoshenko & Gere 1961)

Flexural Buckling Torsional Buckling Flexural Torsional Flexural Torsional


2-axis of symmetry Buckling Buckling
1 axis of symmetry No axis of symmetry

 2E AISC Eqtn AISC Eqtn AISC Eqtn


Fe 
KL / r 2 E4-4 E4-5 E4-6
Column Design Tables

Assumption : Strength Governed by Flexural Buckling


Check Local Buckling

Column Design Tables

Design strength of selected shapes for effective length KL


Table 4-1 to 4-2, (pp 4-10 to 4-316)

Critical Stress for Slenderness KL/r


table 4.22 pp (4-318 to 4-322)
Design of Members in Compression

• Selection of an economical shape: Find lightest shape

• Usually category is defined beforehand, e.g. W, WT etc

• Usually overall nominal dimensions defined in advance


because of architectural and other requirements.

USE OF COLUMN LOAD TABLES

IF NOT APPLICABLE - TRIAL AND ERROR


EXAMPLE I – COLUMN LOAD TABLES

A compression member is subjected to service loads pf 165 dead and 535


kips live. The member is 26 feet long and pinned at each end

LRFD

Calculate factored load

Pu  1.2D  1.6L  1.2(165)  1.6(535)  1,054 kips

Required Design Strength

c Pn  1,054 kips
Enter Column Tables with KL=(1)(26)=26 ft

W14 X 145 design strength :1,230 kips  Pu OK


EXAMPLE I – COLUMN LOAD TABLES

A compression member is subjected to service loads pf 165 dead and 535


kips live. The member is 26 feet long and pinned at each end

ASD

Calculate factored load

Pa  D  L  (165)  (535)  700 kips

Required Allowable Strength


Pn
 700 kips
c
Enter Column Tables with KL=(1)(26)=26 ft

W14 X 132 design strength : 702 kips  Pa OK


EXAMPLE Ii – COLUMN LOAD TABLES

Select the lightest W-shape that can resist a service dead load of 62.5
kips and a service live load of 125 kips. The effective length is 24 feet.
Use ASTM A992 steel
LRFD
Calculate factored load and required strength

Pu  1.2D  1.6L  1.2(62.5)  1.6(125)  275 kips  c Pn


Enter Column Tables with KL=(1)(24)=24 ft
W 8 :No W8 with φc Pn  275 kips
W10 :W10 X 54, c Pn  282 kips No Footnote: No need to
check for local buckling

W12 :W10 X 58, c Pn  293 kips


W14 :W14 X 61, c Pn  293 kips
IF COLUMNS NOT APPLICABLE

1. Assume a value for Fcr

Fcr  Fy

2. Determine required area


LRFD
Pu
c Fcr Ag  Pu  Ag 
c Fcr
ASD
Pa Pa
0.6Fcr   Ag 
Ag 0.6 Fcr
IF COLUMNS NOT APPLICABLE

3 Select a shape that satisfies area requirement

4 Compute Fcr for the trial shape

5 Revise if necessary
• If available strength too close to required value try next tabulated value
• Else repeat 1-4 using Fcr of trial shape

6 Check local stability and revise if necessary


Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft
Calculate factored load and required strength

Pu  1.2D  1.6L  1.2(100)  1.6(300)  600 kips

2
Try Fcr  Fy  33 ksi
3
Pu 600
Required Area Ag    20.2 in 2
c Fcr 0.933
Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft
Try W 18x71

Available Area Ag  20.8 in 2  20.2 OK

KL 26 12
Slenderness   183.5  200 OK
rmin 1.70
 2E  2 (29,000)
Euler’s Stress Fe    8.5 ksi
KL / r 2
183.5 2

E 29,000 KL
Elastic Buckling 4.71  4.71  113   183.5
Slenderness Limit Fy 50 rmin

ELASTIC BUCKLING
Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft

Critical Stress Fcr  0.877 Fe  0.8778.5  7.455 ksi

Design Strength

c Pn  c Fcr Ag  0.9(7.455)( 20.8)  140 kips  600 kips NG


Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft

 33  7.455 
Assume NEW Fcr  20 ksi   
Critical Stress  2 

Pu 600
Ag    33.3 in 2
c Fcr 0.920
Required Area
Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft
Try W 18x119

Available Area Ag  35.1 in 2  33.3 OK

KL 26 12
Slenderness   116.0  200 OK
rmin 2.69
 2E  2 (29,000)
Euler’s Stress Fe    21.27 ksi
KL / r 2
116.0 2

E 29,000 KL
Elastic Buckling 4.71  4.71  113   116
Slenderness Limit Fy 50 rmin

ELASTIC BUCKLING
Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft

Critical Stress Fcr  0.877 Fe  0.87721.27  18.65 ksi

Design Strength

c Pn  c Fcr Ag  0.9(18.65)(35.1)  589 kips  600 kips NG

This is very close, try next larger size


Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft
Try W 18x130

Available Area Ag  38.2 in 2

KL 26 12
Slenderness   115.6  200 OK
rmin 2.70
 2E  2 (29,000)
Euler’s Stress Fe    21.42 ksi
KL / r 2
115.6 2

E 29,000 KL
Elastic Buckling 4.71  4.71  113   115.6
Slenderness Limit Fy 50 rmin

ELASTIC BUCKLING
Example

Select a W18 shape of A992 steel that can resist a service dead load of 100
kips amd a service live load of 300 kips. Effective length KL=26 ft

Critical Stress Fcr  0.877 Fe  0.87721.42  18.79 ksi

Design Strength

c Pn  c Fcr Ag  0.9(18.79)(38.2)  646 kips  600 kips OK


More Length
Effective on Effective Length in
of Columns Factor
Frames

Ic Lc
Ig Lg Ig Lg Assumptions
A • All columns under
Ic Lc consideration reach buckling
Simultaneously
B
• All joints are rigid

• Consider members lying in the


plane of buckling
Define:


• All members have constant A

G
Ic Lc
G 
I c Lc • Elastic Behavior

I I
A B
g Lg g Lg
Effective Length Factor-Alingnment Charts

Use alignment charts (Structural Stability Research Council SSRC)


AISC Commentary Figure C-C2.3 nad C-C2.4 p 16-.1-241

Connections to foundations
(a) Hinge
G is infinite - Use G=10
(b) Fixed
G=0 - Use G=1.0

E KL
Assumption of Elastic Behavior is violated when 4.71 
Inelastic Flexural Buckling Fy rmin
Example

G
 I c Lc
I
W12x96 12’
g Lg
W24x55 A W24x68

Joint A
W12x120 12’
833 / 12  1070 / 12
W24x55 B W24x68 GA   0.94
1350 / 20  1830 / 18
W12x120 15’
Joint B
1070 / 12  1070 / 15
C
GB   0.95
1350 / 20  1830 / 18
20’ 18’
Joint C
Sway Uninhibited
Pinned End GC  10.0
Example

AISC Commentary Figure C-C2.3 nad C-C2.4 p 16-.1-241

COLUMN AB COLUMN BC

GA  0.94 Gc  10.0
GB  0.95 GB  0.95

K x  1.3 K x  1.85
olumns in Frames

More on Effective Length

Assumptions
• All columns under
consideration reach buckling
Simultaneously

• All joints are rigid

• Consider members lying in the


plane of buckling

• All members have constant A

• Elastic Behavior Violated


Alingnment Charts & Inelastic Behavior

Elastic
Ginelastic 
 EI
t c Lc Et
 Gelastic
 2E
 EI
g Lg E
Fcr 
 KL
r
 2
Ginelastic   a  Gelastic

Inelastic Stiffness Fcr ( inelastic) Et


Reduction a  
 2 Et Factor Fcr ( elastic) E
Fcr 
 KL
r
2

SRF: Table 4-21 AISC Manual pp 4-317


Example

Compute Stiffness Reduction Factor per LRFD for an axial compressive stress of
25 ksi and Fy=50 ksi

Pu
 25 ksi
Ag
P 25 F 
Fcr (inelastic)  u   27.78 ksi  0.658 y
Fe
Fy
c Ag 0.9

27.78 ksi  0.65850 Fe 50  Fe  35.61 ksi

Fcr (elastic)  0.877 Fe  0.87735.61  31.23


Fcr (inelastic) 27.28
a    0.890
Fcr ( elastic) 31.23

You might also like