The document discusses various scaling techniques used in marketing research, including comparative and non-comparative scales. Comparative scales include paired comparison, rank order, constant sum, and Q-sort scales. Non-comparative scales include continuous rating scales and itemized rating scales like Likert, semantic differential, and Stapel scales. The document also covers basic data processing operations like editing, coding, and classification of collected research data.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
135 views
Scalling Techniques
The document discusses various scaling techniques used in marketing research, including comparative and non-comparative scales. Comparative scales include paired comparison, rank order, constant sum, and Q-sort scales. Non-comparative scales include continuous rating scales and itemized rating scales like Likert, semantic differential, and Stapel scales. The document also covers basic data processing operations like editing, coding, and classification of collected research data.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33
Scaling Technique
Dr. Yamini Vyas Pandey
Scaling Techniques • Comparative Scale – Paired comparison – Rank order – Constant Sum – Q-sort • Non-comparative – Continuous Rating scale – Itemized rating scale • Likert • Semantic • Stapel Comparative scales • In comparative scaling, the respondent is asked to compare one object with another. • The comparative scales can further be divided into the following four types of scaling techniques: (a) Paired Comparison Scale, (b) Rank Order Scale, (c) Constant Sum Scale, and (d) Q-sort Scale Paired Comparison Scale: • This is a comparative scaling technique in which a respondent is presented with two objects at a time and asked to select one object according to some criterion. • The data obtained are ordinal in nature. For example, there are four types of cold drinks Coke, Pepsi, Sprite, and Limca. The respondents can prefer Pepsi to Coke or Coke to Sprite, etc. Brand Coke Pepsi Sprite Limca Coke - 0 Pepsi - Sprite 0 0 - Limca 0 0 0 - No. of times 2 3 1 preffered Rank Order Scale: • This is another type of comparative scaling technique in which respondents are presented with several items simultaneously and asked to rank them in the order of priority. • This is an ordinal scale that describes the favoured and unfavoured objects, but does not reveal the distance between the objects. • The resultant data in rank order is ordinal data. This yields better results when direct comparison are required between the given objects. • The major disadvantage of this technique is that only ordinal data can be generated. Preference of brands using rank order • Pick one brand which you like most and give 1 rank. • Continue till you ranked all brands • Least preferred brand should be assign 4 Brand Rank Coke 2 Pepsi 1 Sprite 4 Limca 3 Constant Sum Scale: • In this scale, the respondents are asked to allocate a constant sum of units such as points, rupees, or chips among a set of stimulus objects with respect to some criterion. • For example, you may wish to determine how important the attributes of price, fragrance, packaging, cleaning power, and lather of a detergent are to consumers. • Respondents might be asked to divide a constant sum to indicate the relative importance of the attributes. • The advantage of this technique is saving time. However, main disadvantages are the respondents may allocate more or fewer points than those specified. The second problem is respondents might be confused. Importance of detergent attributes using Constant sum scale • Allocation of 100 points among different attributes
Attribute No. of Points
Price 20 Fragrance 20 Packaging 20 Cleaning 30 Brand 10 Q-Sort Scale: • This is a comparative scale that uses a rank order procedure to sort objects based on similarity with respect to some criterion. • The important characteristic of this methodology is that it is more important to make comparisons among different responses of a respondent than the responses between different respondents. Therefore, it is a comparative method of scaling rather than an absolute rating scale. • In this method the respondent is given statements in a large number for describing the characteristics of a product or a large number of brands of a product. Preference of book using Q sort • The bag give to you contain pictures of 90 magazine, please choose 10 magazines you ‘prefer most’, 20 you ‘like’, 30 neutral, 20 ‘dislike’ and 10 ‘prefer least’. • Please list them: Non- Comparative Scales • In non-comparative scaling respondents need only evaluate a single object. Their evaluation is independent of the other object which the researcher is studying. • The non-comparative scaling techniques can be further divided into: (a)Continuous Rating Scale, and (b)Itemized Rating Scale. Continuous Rating Scales : • It is very simple and highly useful. • In continuous rating scale, the respondent’s rate the objects by placing a mark at the appropriate position on a continuous line that runs from one extreme of the criterion variable to the other. • Example : Question: How would you rate the TV advertisement as a guide for buying?
• Strongly Agree (10)---------------------------
strongly disagree (0) • How would you rate the TV advertisement as a guide for buying? • Strongly agree--------------------Strongly disagree Itemized Rating Scales : • Itemized rating scale is a scale having numbers or brief descriptions associated with each category. • The categories are ordered in terms of scale position and the respondents are required to select one of the limited number of categories that best describes the product, brand, company, or product attribute being rated. • Itemized rating scales are widely used in marketing research. • Itemised rating scales is further divided into three parts, namely • (a) Likert scale, • (b) Semantic Differential Scale, and • (c) Stapel Scale. • The itemized rating scales can be in the form of : • (a) graphic, (Emojis) • (b) verbal, (Completely Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Completely dissatisfied) • (c) numeric as shown below : – (-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5) • Quality : Excellent, Good, Not decided, poor , worst • Importance: Very important, fairly important, neutral, not so important, not at all important • Interest: Very interested, Somewhat interested, neither-nor, Somewhat dissatified, Completely Dissatisfied Likert Scale: • Likert, is extremely popular for measuring attitudes, because, the method is simple to administer. • With the Likert scale, the respondents indicate their own attitudes by checking how strongly they agree or disagree with carefully worded statements that range from very positive to very negative towards the attitudinal object. • Respondents generally choose from five alternatives (say strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree). • A Likert scale may include a number of items or statements. • Disadvantage of Likert Scale is that it takes longer time to complete than other itemised rating scales because respondents have to read each statement. Despite the above disadvantages, this scale has several advantages. It is easy to construct, administer and use. Semantic Differential Scale: • This is a seven point rating scale with end points associated with bipolar labels (such as good and bad, complex and simple) that have semantic meaning. • It can be used to find whether a respondent has a positive or negative attitude towards an object. • It has been widely used in comparing brands, products and company images. It has also been used to develop advertising and promotion strategies and in a new product development study. Staple Scale: • The Staple scale was originally developed to measure the direction and intensity of an attitude simultaneously. • Modern versions of the Staple scale place a single adjective as a substitute for the Semantic differential when it is difficult to create pairs of bipolar adjectives. • The modified Staple scale places a single adjective in the center of an even number of numerical Values. Processing & collection of Data Processing operation • 1. Editing: Editing of data is a process of examining the collected raw data (specially in surveys) to detect errors and omissions and to correct these when possible. • As a matter of fact, editing involves a careful scrutiny of the completed questionnaires and/or schedules. • Editing is done to assure that the data are accurate, consistent with other facts gathered, uniformly entered, as completed as possible and have been well arranged to facilitate coding and tabulation. • 2.Coding: Coding refers to the process of assigning numerals or other symbols to answers so that responses can be put into a limited number of categories or classes. • Such classes should be appropriate to the research problem under consideration. They must also possess the characteristic of exhaustiveness (i.e., there must be a class for every data item) and also that of mutual exclusively which means that a specific answer can be placed in one and only one cell in a given category set. • Another rule to be observed is that of unidimensionality by which is meant that every class is defined in terms of only one concept. • 3. Classification: Most research studies result in a large volume of raw data which must be reduced into homogeneous groups if we are to get meaningful relationships. This fact necessitates classification of data which happens to be the process of arranging data in groups or classes on the basis of common characteristics. Data having a common characteristic are placed in one class and in this way the entire data get divided into a number of groups or classes. • (a) Classification according to attributes: As stated above, data are classified on the basis of common characteristics which can either be descriptive (such as literacy, sex, honesty, etc.) or numerical (such as weight, height, income, etc.). Descriptive characteristics refer to qualitative phenomenon which cannot be measured quantitatively; only their presence or absence in an individual item can be noticed. Data obtained this way on the basis of certain attributes are known as statistics of attributes and their classification is said to be classification according to attributes. • Classification according to class-intervals: Unlike descriptive characteristics, the numerical characteristics refer to quantitative phenomenon which can be measured through some statistical units. Data relating to income, production, age, weight, etc. come under this category. Such data are known as statistics of variables and are classified on the basis of class intervals. For instance, persons whose incomes, say, are within Rs 201 to Rs 400 can form one group, those whose incomes are within Rs 401 to Rs 600 can form another group and so on. 4. Tabulation: When a mass of data has been assembled, it becomes necessary for the researcher to arrange the same in some kind of concise and logical order. This procedure is referred to as tabulation. Thus, tabulation is the process of summarizing raw data and displaying the same in compact form (i.e., in the form of statistical tables) for further analysis. In a broader sense, tabulation is an orderly arrangement of data in columns and rows.
Relationship Between Students' Perception and Degree of Satisfaction of SHS Students On Modular Distance Learning Modality of Tagumbao National High School