Obtaining Technology - Implementation
Obtaining Technology - Implementation
Obtaining Technology:
Implementation
Eric Eugenio
MEM611 G18-0279
OVERVIEW
Part 3 – Obtaining Technology: External strategy
Acer Group : A Family of Brands
Chapter 6 – Obtaining Technology: Planning
Chapter 7 - Obtaining Technology: Implementation1
Chapter 8 - Obtaining Technology: Evaluation and Control
2
Appendix 3 – Managing Platforms and Portfolios of Technology
After the planning stage of technology acquisition, the next stage will be
more crucial as most mergers fail as a result of inability to implement the
acquisition.
This presentation will focus on the key questions that management needs
to carefully address at the initial phase and how to deal with the 4 critical
elements of implementation.
1 White, Burton, The Management of Technology and Innovation 2e,. 2011 p.231-260
What Should We Be Doing Now?
Initial 1st Identify the proper timing of short-term and long term
actions
Questions 2nd
What Are The Requirements for Key Activities?
Identify the amount of knowledge transfer, degree,
and speed of integration for key activities
3rd
What and Whom to Delegate?
Identify best persons to do specific tasks/activities. 3
?
1st What Should We Be Doing Now?
1. Trap of Compromise : The goal is to get the 3. Trap of System Superiority : The choice should
best from each organization not compromise be who is best, not the seniority of the person.
2. Trap of Misplaced Beliefs : If the purpose is 4. Trap of Not Blending : Sometimes individuals in a
gaining technological advantage, stay focused merger/acquisition
on that unless other compelling information or alliance may believe that keeping things 6
causes a need to look in a different separate will work and help
direction. everyone feel comfortable.
4 KEY IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENTS
Leadership Alignment
Integration Execution
7
FOUR
Key 8
Implementation
ELEMENTS
CASE STUDY
IBM / PwC Acquisition
- In 2002, IBM bought PwC Consulting for $3.5 -A large number of problems faced the potential merger:
billion in cash and stock. (1) IBM operates as a typical corporation ;
-IBM envisioned the acquisition as part of its PwC was a partnership
(2) PwC involved with consulting/solutions for clients;
IBM Global Systems unit, Business Integration
Services (BIS) division. IBM focused on infrastructure issues. 9
(3) PwC clients might be concerned that IBM products
- IBM hoped to gain specific skills including ERP would be stressed over other products, which may
(enterprise resource planning), CRM (customer actually serve their needs better.
relationship management), and SCM (supply
chain management) from PwC.
+
CASE STUDY
Strategy
- IBM established a 3-stage process (stage 1 and 2 in 2002. stage 3 in 2003)
Stage 1 : Closing the deal, establish basic operating model, unit name
and it’s president. IBM ‘s key asset is their people so they offered retention
10
incentives packages to key employees to stay
Stage 2: Created details on operating models and develop teams for the
integration of key areas .
2014:
1849–1972: 1972: October 1, 2018:
Acquisition of
Essel and Silor Beginning The Birth of 12
Transitions
Rivalry of Essilor EssilorLuxottica
Optical Inc.
https://www.essilor.com/en/the-group/history/near-170-years-history/
THANKS!
Any questions?
13