Scribd
Upload
70 views

Basic Understanding of Airfoil Characteristics at Low

This document summarizes a computational study of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers between 10,000 and 100,000. The study used CFD to simulate flow over various airfoils including NACA profiles, flat plates, and cambered plates. Results showed that at low Reynolds numbers, laminar boundary layer separation occurs closer to the trailing edge compared to higher Reynolds numbers. Increasing thickness was found to decrease lift and increase drag for flat plates. Cambered plates generated more lift than flat plates but were also more sensitive to Reynolds number changes.

Uploaded by

Siddharth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views

Basic Understanding of Airfoil Characteristics at Low

This document summarizes a computational study of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers between 10,000 and 100,000. The study used CFD to simulate flow over various airfoils including NACA profiles, flat plates, and cambered plates. Results showed that at low Reynolds numbers, laminar boundary layer separation occurs closer to the trailing edge compared to higher Reynolds numbers. Increasing thickness was found to decrease lift and increase drag for flat plates. Cambered plates generated more lift than flat plates but were also more sensitive to Reynolds number changes.

Uploaded by

Siddharth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Basic Understanding of

Airfoil Characteristics at
Low
 Reynolds Numbers ()
By :-
SIDDHARTH KUSHWAHA
2211016118
  JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT

Basic Understanding of Airfoil Characteristics at Low


Reynolds Numbers ( and )
Justin Winslow, Hikaru Otsuka, Bharath Govindarajan,
and Inderjit Chopra
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
2074 DOI: 10.2514/1.C034415
Introduction
  A computational study has been conducted on various airfoils
to simulate flows at Reynolds numbers (Re) primarily between
and
 The computational fluid dynamics tool used in this study is a
Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solver with a Spalart–
Allmaras turbulence model and a correlation-based laminar–
turbulent boundary-layer transition model.
 The airfoils investigated in this study include NACA 0009, NACA
0012 (conventional and reversed configuration), Clark-Y, flat
plate airfoils (1, 3, and 5% thickness), and thin cambered plates
(3, 6, and 9% camber). Airfoils were examined for lift and drag
performance as well as surface pressure and flow field
characteristics.
Flow Separation Physics

 Illustration highlighting conventional airfoil separation characteristics at different


Reynolds number regimes below .
 In Fig. c, laminar flow over the upper airfoil surface is subjected to a large
adverse pressure gradient close to the leading edge. Because of the
inherently lower kinetic energy of the laminar boundary layer, the flow
separates as a shear layer.
 At sufficiently high angles of attack, the turbulent boundary layer will
begin to separate close to the trailing edge, resulting in increased pressure
drag and decreased lift.
 At lower Reynolds numbers (50000 < Re < 100000), the separation bubble
and turbulent boundary-layer thickness both increase in size, resulting in
increased parasitic drag.
 As shown in Fig. 2b, the separated shear layer still gains enough
momentum from the free-stream to reattach to the airfoil surface as a
turbulent boundary layer.
 At much lower Reynolds numbers, that is, 10000 < Re < 50000, shown in
Fig. 2a, the laminar separation point is delayed until close to the trailing
edge of the airfoil, even at very low angles of attack, because of the
increased stability of the boundary layer.
Computational Method
 The CFD solver used in this study to investigate low-Reynolds
number aerodynamics is the Transonic Unsteady RotorNavier–
Stokes 2D (TURNS2D) fluid dynamics solver.
 TURNS2D uses a dual-volume formulation to solve for the
Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations.
 For steady problems, an Euler implicit formulation was used for
time marching, with the matrix inversion performed using a
lower–upper symmetric line–Gauss Seidel approach.
 AC-mesh was used as the grid type around the airfoil with an
outer boundary at 15 chord lengths away from the airfoil surface.
Mesh sizes typically contained 267 grid points in the surface-wrap
direction and 123 grid points in the wall-normal direction.
Results
NACA
0009

Nondimensional pressure over the upper surface of a NACA0009 airfoil


for low (a) and high (b) angles of attack at an Re of 50000.
Mach number and intermittency contours at 6 deg angle of attack for the
NACA 0009 highlighting the presence of flow transition on the upper
surface.
Lift and drag comparison of TURNS2D with experiments for NACA 0009
at an Re of 50000.
NACA
0012

  High-Reynolds-number lift and drag comparison of CFD predictions for


NACA0012 at Reynolds numbers of 3 × and .
Process of separation bubble travel at a lower Reynolds number of 3 ×
105. Red arrow highlights the separation bubble.
  Lift, drag, and pitching moment comparison of CFD predictions for
NACA0012 between Reynolds numbers of and .
Effect of Thickness on Flat
Plates

 Effect of flat plate thickness on lift and drag at a Reynolds number


of .
Effect of Camber on Thin
Plates

 
Flat Plate and NACA
0012

  Difference in boundary-layer characteristics between NACA 0012 and 2%


t∕c flat plate at a Reynolds number of 2 × .
  Pressure distribution on the upper and lower surfaces of a NACA 0012 and
2% t∕c flat plate at a Reynolds number of 2 × .
Overall Reynolds Number Effects

Effect of Reynolds number on multiple airfoils in terms of the drag


Effect of Reynolds number on multiple airfoils in terms of lift-to-drag against
THANK YOU

You might also like