The Simplified CDP Process
The Simplified CDP Process
Process
Planning
Mandates &
the Code-
WHY
should LGUs
Mandated
plan? Plans
Two Comprehensive Plans
Mandated in the LGC
Sec. 20 (c), RA 7160
The local government units shall,
in conformity with existing laws,
continue to prepare their
respective comprehensive land
use plans enacted through zoning
ordinances which shall be the
primary and dominant bases for
Comprehensiv the future use of land resources:
e Land Use Provided, That the requirements
for food production, human
Plan (CLUP) settlements, and industrial
expansion shall be taken into
consideration in the preparation of
such plans.
The CDP:
“Each local government unit
shall have a comprehensive
multi-sectoral development
plan to be initiated by its
development council and
approved by its sanggunian.”
1 2
5 Improvement of
public morals 7
6 Promotion of full
Maintenance of peace &
order employment
8
9Preservation of comfort & convenience Enhancement of economic
of the inhabitants prosperity & social justice
CDP/C
LUP
The Rationalized Simplified
Local Planning
System
CDP
Process
HOW
Is the CDP
Prepared?
Approach to the CDP Formulation Process
Participatory Consultative Inclusive
PUNONG BARANGAYS*
CONGRESSMAN OR
REPRESENTATIVE
CSOs/POs/ PS
Formulate development plans and policies;
LDC IN Formulate public investment programs;
Appraise and prioritize programs and projects;
PLENARY Formulate investment incentives;
Coordinate, monitor and evaluate implementation of development programs and projects.
Barangay Development Councils:
Mobilize people’s participation in local development functions;
Prepare barangay development plans;
Monitor and evaluate implementation of national or local programs and projects.
LPDO, SWDO, POSO, CTWG + Police Chief, Fire ETWG + Sports Organizations,
LDC Rep (Barangay), Marshall, Local Civil Religious Leaders, Labor
SOCIAL LDC Rep (CSO), Registrar, PCUP, Nutrition groups, Senior Citizens, Media
District Supervisor, Officer, Housing Board Rep, Reps, YMCA/YWCA, Civic
PTA Federation, NSO, Manager of GSIS/SSS Organizations, School
Sanggunian Rep Principals, Charitable
Organizations
CTWG + DTI Rep, Chamber of
PESO, Agriculturist,
Commerce & Industry, Trade
Tourism officer, Coop
Unions, Bank Managers, ETWG + Lions club, Jaycees,
ECONOMIC Development Officer,
Market Vendors, Sidewalk Rotary Club, Academe, other
LPDO Staff, LDC Rep
Vendors, Cooperatives, interested individuals/
(Barangay), LDC Rep
Transport Organizations groups
(CSO), Saggunian Rep
Figure III.
Relationship of
City/Municipal
Plans
(Source: CDP
Guidebook, chart
based on the
original design of
Prof. Ernesto
Serote)
Organize and Mobilize the Planning Team (Step 1)
Review Vision and Revisit Plans (Step 2)
Review Vision and Revisit Plans (Step 2)
INTERCHANGEABLE Generating New 4a
1 Setting 2 Determining Information (Observed
Conditions) Extracting
the Current Reality Intelligence
Vision in the LGU 3
4b
Determining Vision –
Plan Monitoring Determining
11
Reality Gap
& Evaluation Policy Options
Implementing the 5
Plan/ Enforcing SIMPLIFIED
10 Setting Goals,
Regulations PLANNING Objectives &
PROCESS Targets
9 Executive-
Budgeting Legislative
Priorities
8
Investment
Screening of PPAs/
Programming Structuring
Legislations
6 Solutions
7
SIMPLIFIED COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING PROCESS
Generating New
Determining
Step Setting the Step Information
Current
1 (Observed Step
Vision 2 Reality in the
Conditions) 3
LGU
Data requirements Determining Vision –
and sources for social, Reality Gap
economic,
A desired state or scenario environmental,
of the LGU and its people. infrastructure,
institutional
Stakeholders’ shared development How large the difference is
image of the LGU’s future. sectors between the ideal state of
the LGU and the existing
Keeps the LGU in its Ecological Profiling to situation
course despite changing determine current
demands of constituents realities How near the current
and shifting political and
situation in the LGU is to
economic forces.
the vision as defined by the
constituents and the LGU.
Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List (Step 3)
Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List (Step 3)
Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS)
• The RaPIDS is a tool developed under the LGU PFM 2 Project that aims to guide local
planners in identifying development indicators that specifically applies to their LGU’s
needs and characteristics.
• RaPIDS still follow the principles of the LDIS which is based on the LGU’s Vision and
success indicators.
• RaPIDS only updated the indicators to make them consistent with those required and
accepted by NGAs and international institutions.
• Indicators for specific ecosystems are also identified. RaPIDS aims to address the issue on data
gathering by helping planners identify indicators that apply to them and those that they really
need as compared to prescribing a one size fits all data set which makes data gathering very
challenging at the onset.
• It also has specific indicators that LGUs may need should they have particular development
thrusts such as indicators for tourism development and indicators that can help LGUs identify
PPAs to make themselves more business-friendly.
Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List (Step 3)
Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS)
SIMPLIFIED COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING PROCESS
Step
Screening of PPAs/ Step Investment Step
Budgeting
7 8 9
Legislations Programming
• The LDIP should have a time frame of three (3) years. Its
annual component is what is referred to as the Annual
Investment Program (AIP). The preparation of the LDIP is
mentioned as one of the basis for the budget document in the
Department of Budget and Management’s (DBM) Budget
Operations Manual (BOM) for Local Government Units.
The number of public projects that an LGU can finance depends on the following:
b. Analyze the historical trends in terms of the average annual growth rate.
Stream 2: Determining Investible Funds
Step 2: Collect appropriate operating expenditure data including existing debt service and determine
historical trends.
Among the key factors that must be considered in assessing structural relationships between revenue
and expenditure items are the following:
Future recurring levels can be projected based on a careful assessment of all probable factors that affect
each revenue source.
a. RPT collection should be projected separately because of its large contribution to LGU revenue
sources; and because real properties will be the main beneficiary of LGU investments in terms of
increased values.
b. Business fees and licenses, other taxes, services and operations, and all others can be projected
using either the historical growth rates (with or without adjustments) or using computed elasticities
and assumed per capita income growth rates.
Stream 2: Determining Investible Funds
Step 4: Project future recurring revenue and operating expenditure levels
Future recurring levels can be projected based on a careful assessment of all probable factors that affect
each revenue source.
a. RPT collection should be projected separately because of its large contribution to LGU revenue
sources; and because real properties will be the main beneficiary of LGU investments in terms of
increased values.
b. Business fees and licenses, other taxes, services and operations, and all others can be projected
using either the historical growth rates (with or without adjustments) or using computed elasticities
and assumed per capita income growth rates.
Stream 2: Determining Investible Funds
Step 4: Project future recurring revenue and operating expenditure levels
c) Future normal recurring expenses can be projected using either of the following techniques:
ii. the historical average expenditure per unit of output in the case of LGU business enterprises.
Stream 2: Determining Investible Funds
Step 5: Compute the financial surplus available for the financing of new investments.
The following computational procedure can be used to establish the new investment financing capacity
of the LGU.
Projected Revenues
a. how many of the approved projects can be funded from regular sources for the 3 – year period; and
a. The LDC approves the final list of projects when a proper match is attained between total
project cost and available funds on a year-by-year basis through a vote or consensus.
c. If the aggregate cost is more than the amount of available investible funds, the LDC
deliberates on and decides what financing approach to take.
Stream 3: Formulating the Financing Plan
Stream 3: Formulating the Financing Plan
Stream 3: Formulating the Financing Plan
Stream 3: Formulating the Financing Plan
Step 3: The LPDO prepares the 3 – year investment program and submits the draft LDIP to the
LCE;
Step 6: The Sanggunian, through a resolution adopts the 3 – year investment program or LDIP.
Preparing the AIP
• In accordance with the provisions of JMC No. 001 series of 2007, the LDC shall cull out the AIP from
the current slice of the LDIP, which upon approval of the Sanggunian, shall serve as the basis for
preparing the Executive Budget.
• The LDC shall endorse the AIP to the local budget officer for the budget preparation and in determining
the annual budgetary allocations for PPA vis-à-vis allocations for other purposes as indicated in the
AIP Summary Form.
Preparing the AIP
Prepare Local Development Investment Program (Step 4)
Comprehensive Development Plan
Development (CDP)
Planning
(January-
December of
Structured List of Programs, Projects
Election Year)
and Activities (PPAs)
Stream 1
Stream 2
Prioritization of PPAs using
tools (CCC, Urgency Test, New Investment Financing The LTO will
Resource Impact and GAM Potential (Net amount of Revenue provide the
Analysis) Revenue Forecast
Forecast minus Forward Estimates of
Planning Team & LDC Expenditures) for 6 years and the
LBO will provide
the corresponding
Ranked List of forward estimates
PPAs Local Resource Mobilization of expenditures to
Conservative Program (LRMP) (Additional Funds net out the New
Approach – cut the from improved Fiscal Management) investment
list of PPAs to work Financing
within the New Developmental Potential
Investment Approach – find
Financing Potential other sources of LFC + LDC
only funds
Stream 3
Matched?
Investment
YES
Programming
(January-June
If a match has been made, the LPDC
07 of ensuing 3-Year Local Development prepares LDIP with its corresponding
year) Investment Program (LDIP) RMP and/or Financing options to be
approved by the LDC and endorsed to the
Sanggunian for adoption
Annual Investment Program LPDC prepares the AIP (annual
(AIP) slice of the LDIP) for approval by
the LDC and submits to the
Sanggunian for adoption
Annual Budget
Budgeting
(June – December of
every year)
Prepare needed implementation instruments (Step 5)
SIMPLIFIED COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING PROCESS
Implementing the Step Plan Monitoring
Plan/ Enforcing 10 & Evaluation Step
Regulations 11
LOCATION
Success
Indicators PRINCIPLES
Settlement
C D P Protection
VISION –
REALITY GAP SECTORAL SECTORAL Production
GOALS OBJECTIVES Infrastructure
CURRENT
REALITY
Whatever it What can be DEVELOPMENT
takes to reasonably Policies
• Ecological Profile
• Statistical close the done in 3 Strategies
Compendium gap years Programs
• Thematic Maps
Projects
Legislations
CONTENTS OF THE CDP
PRELIMINARY PAGES
Resolution adopting the CDP
The
Simplified Foreword
CDP Process Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Boxes
Quick Facts about the LGU
Matrix of Local Development Indicators
CONTENTS OF THE CDP
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
Vision
The Vision – Reality Gap Analysis
Simplified
CDP Process
Cross-Sectoral and Special Issues and Concerns
Sectoral Development Plans
o Social Sector Development Plan
o Economic Sector Development Plan
o Infrastructure and Land Use Sector
Development Plan
o Environmental Management
o Institutional Sector Development Plan
CONTENTS OF THE CDP
The o Introduction
Simplified o Goals and Objectives / Targets
CDP Process o Objectives
o Strategies
o Programs and Projects
o Legislative Requirements
o Project Ideas or Project Briefs