Relief and Flare Sytem Design (Autosaved)
Relief and Flare Sytem Design (Autosaved)
design
A BASIC INTRODUCTION
BY QAYYUM KHAN– LEAD PROCESS ENGINEER
2
Mexico City Disaster 3
API STD 2000 Venting atmospheric and low pressure storage tank
8
9
Locate
Relief valve
Selection
of Relief
valve
Credible
Scenario
Choose
Worst case
Size relief
valve
Design
relief
system
10
Proximity to protected equipment and To
Flare
should be at or between the source of
overpressure and Equipment/piping.
In vapor service, it should be located at
a high point in the system. There must be Static
clear path exists between the source of
overpressure and the relief valve. Accumulation
Demister pad
12
A. Conventional type
It is used when back pressure
Advantages
+ Less expensive, most reliable
type if properly sized and
operated
+ Versatile - can be used in
many services
16
Disadvantages
- Relieving pressure
affected by back
pressure Conventional
Advantages
+ It can be used in flashing
service.
+ Can handle higher built-
up back pressure
+ Protects spring from
corrosion
18
Disadvantages
- Bellows susceptible to
fatigue/rupture
- May release
flammables/toxics to
atmosphere
- It can not be used in the
service where freezing
may occur, including
hydrate formation.
- Not suitable for heavy
oils, waxy service
19
B. Pilot operated
It is used when back pressure
is less than 70% of set
pressure.
Advantages
+ Back flow preventer feature
+ Can operate at up to 98% of
set pressure
+ Less susceptible to chatter
(some models)
+ Low pressure application,
where operating pressure is
90% of set pressure
+ Where premium tightness
desired
20
Disadvantages
A. Rapture Disc
It is used when operating pressure is 70%
of the rated burst pressure. Reverse-
acting
disk are used for operating pressure 90%
of burst pressure
Advantages
+ It is not affected by
variation in process
temperature.
+ Easy maintenance and
replacement, it does
not require isolating and
opening the devices.
25
o Relief scenarios are due to an imbalance in heat,
pressure, mass species (chemical reaction).
o In order to design the safety and relief systems, the
process engineer must determine the cause of
overpressure. It require detail analysis of entire system
and identification of all potential upsets (during start of
run and end of run) both internal and external to process
equipment
o The result of above analysis need to be incorporated in
the Relief narrative.
26
Relief scenarios
1. Blocked outlet
2. Loss of cooling
3. Reflux failure
4. Loss of feed
5. Overfilling
6. Automatic control failure
7. Abnormal heat input
8. Exchanger tube rupture
9. Fire case
27
10. Hydraulic expansion
11. Total power failure/partial power failure
12. Internal explosion
13. Addition of volatiles
14. Side stream reflux/pump around failure
15. Accumulation of non condensate
16. Check valve failure.
17. Upset /Relief in adjacent equipment
18. Vapor break through
19. Loss of separation ability
20. Inadvertent operation of a manual valve
28
Blocked out let should be assumed to occur at any location
in the process where flow could be blocked. The effect of
blocked outlet should be applied to piping system as well
as equipment.
Flow blockage could be caused by
Inadvertent closing or failure of manual valve
Accumulation of solid
Failure to remove isolation blind
Failure of instrumented system or control valve
Failure of cooling water for condensing system
This scenario may be applied with other relief scenario
example thermal
Expansion.
29
Pump discharge
In this scenario, only source of fluid having sufficient pressure to exceed MAWP shall be considered
blocked outlet
as event of causing relief .Example when MAWP of equipment is higher than maximum discharge
pressure of centrifugal pump (at maximum suction and shut in condition, plus frequency variation
and turbine over speed ),relief load for closed outlet is zero.
30
No flow
Pressure
3% frequency
factor
Normal flow
Centrifugal
Pump
Capacity
31
0.82
Q 21,000 F A
Btu/hr wet
0.82
Q 34,500 F A
Btu/hr wet
39
• W = Q/λ
• W = reliving rate ( lbs/hr)
Relieving rate • Q = Heat absorption by vessel
(Btu/Hr )
• λ = Latent heat of vaporization (BTU/lbs)
40
A = W/Gmax*Kb*Kd
46
This section pertains to analyzing partial power failure scenarios for calculating individual relief load. Starting point for assessing
electric power failure is single diagram, which defines the bus allocation of A, B, and potentially C motor driver. The loss of
any bus or part of a bus bar(and consequence the connected downstream buses)must be considered. Electrical driven
equipment is generally arranged on the bus bar such that the main driver is on the apposite half of bus bar to
the standby unit
For the power failure scenario under investigation determine the following:
Loss of voltage level individually and resulting electric system affected (for example complete unit wise loss of 440 volt supply, while 2300 volt supply,
steam driver, gas engine driver etc still operable )
Loss of any one feeder system or substation (for example complete wise loss of 440 volt and 2300 volt while steam driver and gas driver still operating.
Failure of one bus (e.g A or B pump buses) if the driven equipment can be arrange such that the individual relief loads can be made worse by failure
of only certain driver
Partial power failure can cause greater relief load than total power failure
47
Relief load
Unbalance heat load
calculation
for column:
I. Basic approach is to make a mass
and energy balance under relief
condition. We must make
estimate of all streams (mass and
enthalpy ) crossing system
boundary during relief except
actual relief load
48
Basic unbalanced heat load equation:
49