0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views32 pages

Eiabc: Department of Construction Technology and Management

The document discusses various project procurement and contract delivery systems including: (1) force account, (2) design-bid-build, (3) design-build, (4) build-operate-transfer, (5) construction/facility management consultancy. It provides details on the key characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each system. Construction management-for-fee is described as a system where the construction manager provides project management services for a fixed fee but does not assume construction risks.

Uploaded by

Mî Ra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
94 views32 pages

Eiabc: Department of Construction Technology and Management

The document discusses various project procurement and contract delivery systems including: (1) force account, (2) design-bid-build, (3) design-build, (4) build-operate-transfer, (5) construction/facility management consultancy. It provides details on the key characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of each system. Construction management-for-fee is described as a system where the construction manager provides project management services for a fixed fee but does not assume construction risks.

Uploaded by

Mî Ra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32

EIABC

DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY AND


MANAGEMENT

PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

CHAPTER TWO: PROCUREMENT & CONTRACT DELIVERY


SYSTEMS
2. Procurement and Contract Delivery
2

 Procurement and Contract Delivery system is the way Project


Owners together with Project Regulators and Financiers
determine the assignment of responsibilities to Project
Stakeholders along the Construction Process.

 A formalized contractual approach which allows an owner


to secure planning and design services and build a project,
assuring effective management throughout.

 Procurement and Contract Delivery system is often


determined during the Basic Planning phase of Construction
Project.
2.1 Types & Development
3

 Procurement Delivery method is an organizational


concept which assigns specific responsibilities and
authorities to people and organizations and which
defines relationship of the various elements in
construction of a project.
 Methods of project delivery system
 Force Account,
 Design Bid Build (DBB),
 Design Build (DB) or Turnkey,
 Finance / Build Operate transfer System (BOT),
 Construction/Facility Management Consultancy
 Alliances.
1. Force Account
4

 When the Project Owners engage themselves to


undertake the project, it is called a force account
delivery system. This system is promoted for
• Comparative advantage of cost, quality and time
• Scale of projects and technology (large, small)
• Remote projects
• Spatially scattered and maintenance projects
2. Design bid build
5
Merits of DBB
6

 Contractors bid competitively, based on complete


design documents to maximize the built product for
the price
 The owner selects the Designer on the basis of
qualifications or ability
 The Designer is active in construction administration,
so design intentions are followed.
 Design and construction roles are clearly defined,
and responsibilities and liabilities are also clear.
 Owner is an active participant in design process.
Demerits of DBB
7

 Fragmented contract for the project owner


 Severe Adversarial relations between the
contracting parties, rather than foster a cooperative
atmosphere
 Non - Impartiality of the Design and Contract
Administration services
 Project owner responsibility for risks associated with
the design and contract administration
 Design-Bid-Build construction phases are sequential
and may require more time
 No built-in incentives for contractors to provide
enhanced performance (cost, time, quality, or
combination thereof)
Demerits of DBB
8

 Owner is at risk for final construction cost. Actual


construction costs are not known until design and
bidding are complete.
 The inability of design and contract administration
consultants to cope up with new construction
technologies and constructability issues of their
designs.
 The indirect contractual obligation assigned for the
Design and Contract Administration consultants.
 Often prone to adversarial positions that lead to
disputes and claims
3. Design Build/Turnkey
9

 Design Build or Turnkey Delivery system is a


response to problems associated to the last two
types of delivery systems.

 This system is common worldwide specifically for


Private projects.

 This led lead contracting firms to form a team or


consortium of designers and specialty contractors who
work together to meet the entire demand.
3. Design-Build
10

OWNER

DESIGN-BUILD
FIRM

design
subcontractors construction
design subcontractors
subconsultants
suppliers
Advantage of DB
11

 reducing fragmentation and adversarial relations


between designers and constructors;
 minimizing Project owners’ risk transferable due to
Designers’ faults;
 accountability and entire responsibility for both design
and construction is onto a single contractor;
 employers’ responsibility to co-ordinate is avoided;
 single point responsibility minimizes the opportunity to
claims
 the client budget or financial requirement is defined
early enough
 Earlier schedule and cost certainty
Disadvantage of DB
12

The General disadvantage of this delivery system


is
 loss of control,
 cost of tender and
 cost of risks.
4. Build Operate Transfer
13

 Build - Operate – Transfer(BOT) is a form of procurement


and contract delivery system that promotes Public Private
Partnership (PPP) in which a private company is
contracted to finance, design, construct, and operate for a
certain period (usually 10 years) and transfer.
 the project owner is not responsible for any liability other
than force majeure and agreed upon claim adjustments.
 The Operation period between completion and transfer
gives the contractor an opportunity to verify the quality of
the output of the services and works
 BOT project involves a potentially complex contractual
structure
BOT Contractual Structure
14
Advantages of BOT
15

 It minimizes owners’ scarcity of financial resources;


 It devoid of considerable risks from the project owners
 the facility is well operated and transferred with free
of charge or minimum compensations to project
owners.
 Integrates the process of design, construction,
operation, and maintenance.
 Projects are likely completed faster
Disadvantage of BOT
16

 Costs more in the long run


 Longer tendering process
 Costly tendering
 No capable local contractors (for our case)
 Contractors may not be interested in all works
5. Construction/Facility Management
Consultancy
17

 response to problems associated with DB and BOT


 Construction management consultancy firm is used
to coordinate all activities from concept inception
through acceptance of the facility.
 Facility management consultancy adds operation
of facility during operation and maintenance to
Construction Management Consultancy.
Construction Management consul..
18

 CM is involved in the whole construction processes where as


all the others involve only during the implementation phase
after major decisions was made during the Basic planning
phase
 Construction Management Consultants then represents
Project Owners to carry out the following services:
 Feasibility studies of Construction related services
 Plan and Monitor the Triple Constraints of Project
Performances
 Lead and Organize regulatory systems of the
Construction Industry
 Valuation, Quantity Surveying and Procurement and
Contract Management Services
Construction Management
19

 Construction management is a broad term covering a


variety of project delivery scenarios in which a
construction manager becomes an integral part of the
team, at early stages in the project, to oversee such
elements as schedule, cost, and construction
methodologies and procurement strategies.
 The general Construction Management variations are
Construction Management-for-Fee (CM for-Fee)
and
Construction Management-at-Risk (CM-at-Risk),
CM for-Fee
20

CM-for-fee is a delivery method similar to the DBB


In CM-for-fee method,
the construction manager is responsible for project and site
management,
 but is not involved in actual construction work.
The construction manager monitors cost, time, quality and safety,
 but does not take responsibility for them.

 The construction manager is paid a fixed or time based fees


for services provided
 The construction management organization takes an advisory
role or role of an agent to the client
 The CM has limited risk because construction contracts are
between the owner and individual contractors.
Construction Management-for-Fee
21
(CM for-Fee)

Owner

Agency
CM

A/E
GC

Designers and Consultants

Subcontractors and Suppliers


Advantages of CM for-Fee
22

 Managing and administering all phases of a


project.
 Treats Planning, Construction and Design, as
an Integral Task.
 Cost and Schedule Control
 Constructability input at design stage
Disadvantages of CM for-Fee
23

 No contractual relationships with trade


contractors
 No contractual responsibility for outcomes of a
project
 Client retains the risks
 Additional cost for the Construction Manager
CM at-Risk
24

 In CM-at-risk, the construction manager, apart from


providing constructability inputs at the design stage, is
also responsible for construction means and methods and
delivery of the completed work, including quality and
performance of the asset
 All procurement in the project is done by the construction
manager,
 owner contracts with the designer and the construction
manager-at-risk,
 construction manager-at-risk contracts with the
subcontractors.
 But, still, the client retains the final decision in
project delivery
Construction Management-at-Risk
25
(CM at-Risk)

Owner

Agency
CM

A/E
GC

Designers and Consultants

Subcontractors and Suppliers


Advantages of CM at-Risk
26

 Good for clients with insufficient staff


 Owner flexibility
 Responsible for cost and time overruns
 Holds and manages trade contractors
 Constructability design review
 Legal position as a General Contractor
 Works closely as a teaming effort and encouraging
trust and partnering
 Phased construction (fast tracking) possible
Disadvantages of CM at-Risk
27

 Lack of capable construction managers


 Demanding work organization
 Lack of cost certainty for each work packages
 Lack of contractors who can provide both
construction management and construction services
 Fragmentation, as compared to DB& BOT
 No exactly defined work packages (bill of
quantities)
6. Partnering, Alliances, Outsourcing and CE & JIT
28

 It focuses most on management of relationships


and value adding to ensure quicker, cheaper and
quality services and products with less disputes
 This is a method where an owner/developer and
a contractor agree to work together by freely
sharing resources, risks and knowledge during the
course of the project
 These systems require to overcome cultural and
behavioral barriers among interest groups and
control motivated performance based
management
Partnering, Alliances, Outsourcing and CE & JIT
29

This type of project procurement can be


distinguished from others by

 collective performance of obligations by


the owner/developer and contractor,
 decision-making by consensus,
 commitment to resolve disputes without
resort to litigation
Consideration in Selecting Project
30
Delivery Methods
 Choice of project delivery methods can be pictured in a
different context, which displays the project delivery
methods viewed by means of two criteria. This is based
on whether the project delivery methods are based on:
approach (segmented or integrated), and
Source of finance (direct or indirect funding)
 If the goal is to seek traditional or segmented delivery
methods, then the client would consider the following
delivery methods.
Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
Construction Management (CM) at fee.
Some Considerations
31

 If the goal is to seek integrated delivery methods, then


the client would consider the following delivery
methods.
Design-Build (DB)
Construction Management (CM at-Risk)
Design-Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
 And if the intention is to seek direct project funding, the
owner may consider the following options:
Design-Bid-Build (DBB)
DB (Design-Build)
Construction Management (CM) at fee and at risk.
Some Considerations:
32

 If the goal is to seek external financing (indirect


funding), then the client would consider the build-
operate-transfer (BOT ).
 Note: It is worth mentioning that the
above division is based on the normal
procedure or the usual practice. It may
vary as agreed up on.

You might also like