Grounded Theory Design is a qualitative research method developed by sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. It involves collecting and analyzing rich data to develop a theory that is grounded in the data. The researcher moves between collecting and analyzing data through multiple iterations until reaching saturation, where no new insights emerge. This constant comparative analysis uses open, axial, and selective coding to group data into categories and themes to articulate an understanding of the phenomenon under study.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
164 views
Pod Handler
Grounded Theory Design is a qualitative research method developed by sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. It involves collecting and analyzing rich data to develop a theory that is grounded in the data. The researcher moves between collecting and analyzing data through multiple iterations until reaching saturation, where no new insights emerge. This constant comparative analysis uses open, axial, and selective coding to group data into categories and themes to articulate an understanding of the phenomenon under study.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
GROUNDED
THEORY DESIGN Grounded Theory Design is a qualitative research approach developed by 2 sociologists, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss.
It is a method where rich data are collected and
analyzed, and through which, a theory is developed or grounded.
According to Field and Morse (1985), “constructs and
concepts that are grounded in the data and hypotheses are tested as they arise from the research.” It uses both Inductive and Deductive Approach to theory development In a Deductive Grounded Theory, a theory is always introduced as a relevant theory then collection of data follows.
In an Inductive Approach, collection of data is
conducted first, and then through analysis of these data, the synthesized form is the theory itself. Leininger (1985) assrets that a pre – study of literature search could lead to “premature closure.” This means that the researcher would go into the research setting expecting to find what is reported in the literature. Characteristics of a Grounded Theory Design: 1. Purposeful Sampling is used.
2. Data are gathered in Naturalistic settings (field settings).
3. Data collection and Data analysis occur simultaneously.
– A process called Constant Comparison is used. ( data are constantly compared to data that have already been gathered) 4. It presumes that it is possible to discover fundamental patterns in social life. (These patterns are called basic social processes)
5. It is more concerned with the generation rather
than the testing of hypotheses.
6. Theoretical Sampling is used as part of analysis.
7. A Core Category Grounded in the data is
identified. Example of Grounded Theory Research Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy
Gloria Ladson-Billings
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy
•Examined the pedagocical practices of eight elementary school teachers in a small town in North Carolina Advantages: Disadvantages: ■ Grounded theory can identify the ■ Grounded theory methods situated nature of knowledge, as well as the contingent nature of practice. tend to produce large ■ Grounded theory produces a 'thick amounts of data, often description that acknowledges areas of difficult to manage. conflict and contradiction. ■ Researchers need to be ■ Grounded theory is better at determining what actually happens. skillful in using grounded ■ As a general theory, grounded theory theory methods. adapts readily to studies of diverse phenomena. ■ There are no standard rules to ■ Grounded theory can respond and follow for the identification of change as conditions that affect behavior categories change. Data Collecting Techniques: ■ The Grounded Theory Approach involves constant comparative analysis or what has come to be called the Constant Comparative Method. ■ This involves the researcher moving in and out of the data collection and analysis process. This back and forth movement between data collection and analysis is sometimes called an 'iteration.' Grounded theory research involves multiple iterations. ■ The process begins with the researcher asking a question or series of questions designed to lead to the development or generation of a theory regarding some aspect of social life (e.g. how do nurses see their role in the care delivery process in primary care settings?) ■ This generative question, leads to the first iteration of theoretical sampling. Identifying an initial sample of people to observe or talk to (e.g. Registered Nurses). ■ After collecting some data the researcher analyzes it. The process of analysis allows the researcher to begin to develop a theory with regard to his or her question. Based on this initial theory, the researcher decides how next to sample (e.g. speak to nurses with varying educational backgrounds). This is called Theoretical Sampling. ■ This process of continually collecting and analyzing data and engaging in a theoretial sampling process are critical features of the constant comparative analysis that Glaser and Strauss describe. ■ The comparative process continues until the researcher reaches saturation - the point at which there are no new ideas and insights emerging from the data. Instead, the researcher sees strong repetition in the themes he or she has already observed and articulated. ■ The process of analyzing the data also involves three level or types of coding: ■ open coding - where the researcher begins to segment or divide the data into similar groupings and forms preliminary categories of information about the phenomenon being examined ■ axial coding - following intensive open coding, the researcher begins to bring together the categories he or she has identified into groupings. These groupings resemble themes and are generally new ways of seeing and understanding the phenomenon under study ■ selective coding - the researcher organizes and integrates the categories and themes in a way that articulates a coherent understanding or theory of the phenomenon of study.