Small group communication involves interactions between 5-15 people working together towards a common goal. It has several key qualities including members, a shared goal, interaction, and interdependence. Small groups can be categorized based on their purpose, level of participation, seating arrangement, and communication patterns. Examples of small group types include panels, symposiums, lectures, roundtables, brainstorming sessions, and meetings. The document provides guidance on conducting small group discussions around various topics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views13 pages
Small-Group Communication
Small group communication involves interactions between 5-15 people working together towards a common goal. It has several key qualities including members, a shared goal, interaction, and interdependence. Small groups can be categorized based on their purpose, level of participation, seating arrangement, and communication patterns. Examples of small group types include panels, symposiums, lectures, roundtables, brainstorming sessions, and meetings. The document provides guidance on conducting small group discussions around various topics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13
Small-Group Communication
As an interaction of five or more
people who work together to achieve their common goal. The qualities as small-group communication • 1. Members ( at least 5 to 15 members) • 2. Goal • 3.Interaction • 4. Interpendence • 5. Working Barker and Grant identify several categories of Groups • 1. According to purpose a. Primary or Psyche group- gives support to its members. (family,social,political,religious,academic groups,neighbor) b. Discussion-group –functions as a clearing house where members are required to speak out for the enlightment of the members in finding to a solution. Elements of Discussion-Group • 1. Face –to- face encounter • 2. leadership • 3. Common purpose • 4. Shared characteristics 2. According Participation • Groups are categorized into
• A. Public-open discussion – group
-- an audience is present to listen and at times to participate in the proceedings (ex. Panel, lecture,and symposium B. Private or closed discussion –group -- is one in which no audience listens or participates in the proceedings.(ex, Executive council or cabinet meeting,problem-solving meeting.) 3. According to Seating Arrangement • Group communication to be effective must take place in a good environment,and this starts with the seating arrangement . • Seating arrangements are either formal or informal depending on the nature of the meeting. 4. According to communication patterns • In general ,interpersonal communication can be one – way or two- way
a. One-way communication pattern occurs
when the sender of the message transmits information in the form of directives and expects no response,no further discussion, or feedback. • B. two-way communication –involves the sahring of information between two- or more parties in an interactive exchange ideas. Types of Small- Discussion Group • 1. Panel discussion • 2. Symposium • 3. Lecture Panel • 4. Round-Table Discussion • 5. Brainstorming • 6. The Buzz session • 7. meeting • 8. Committee Act 1. • Form groups of three.each Group chooses one topic or issue from those listed below.Discuss your issue using of structures of the small group discussion-group assigned to you. • 1. Pannel Discussion • 2.3.4.5.6.7.8. The issues are:
• 1. Illegal drugs have snared both the young
and no-longer- young into the maelstorm of addiction.Sadly ,their roads lead to nowhere but perdition. What can you do to help solve drug addiction? • 2. Our ecological problems are also moral problems because the roots of natures destruction are greed, selfishness,lack of moral concern. Who are to blame? • 3. Life seems to have gotten off its fulcrum. Future shocks have now become realities. One of them is same-sex marriage. Should we follow the example of the United states of America and other European Countries and allow same-sex- marriage in the Philippines?