Determining Truth: Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person Janis A. Jose
The document discusses several theories of truth: correspondence theory, which sees truth as corresponding to reality; coherence theory, which sees truth as consistency within a context; constructivist theory, which sees truth as influenced by social and cultural forces; consensus theory, which sees truth as agreed upon; and pragmatic theory, which sees truth as what is useful in practice. It also discusses logical fallacies like ad hominem and appeal to emotion arguments, as well as biases like confirmation bias and framing effects.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
115 views
Determining Truth: Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person Janis A. Jose
The document discusses several theories of truth: correspondence theory, which sees truth as corresponding to reality; coherence theory, which sees truth as consistency within a context; constructivist theory, which sees truth as influenced by social and cultural forces; consensus theory, which sees truth as agreed upon; and pragmatic theory, which sees truth as what is useful in practice. It also discusses logical fallacies like ad hominem and appeal to emotion arguments, as well as biases like confirmation bias and framing effects.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23
DETERMINING TRUTH
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person
Janis A. Jose Theories of Truth • Correspondence Theory: – If corresponds to reality or the actual state of affairs.
– Assumes direct relationship between
an idea and reality and that a statement can be taken as Fact. • Coherence Theory: –Something is true if it makes sense when placed in a certain situation or context. –An idea or statement is true because it makes sense in its own context. –Has sense of consistency which renders it truthfulness. • Constructivist Theory: –Knowledge is shaped by social forces and influenced by culture and history. –What a person believes, is shaped by his society and culture. – What is true may be influenced by historical developments and social struggles. • Consensus Theory: –Knowledge is based on agreement and that something is true if almost everyone agrees that it is true. –Used to determine the truth of scientific claims. • Pragmatic Theory: –Something is true if we can put it into practice or if it is useful in real life. –Ideas should be tested to confirm its validity. FALLACIES • Arguments based on faulty reasoning. Ad hominem • Attacking the person making the argument instead the argument itself. Appeal to force • Using the threat of force or an undesirable event to advance an argument. Appeal to Emotion • Using emotions such as pity or sympathy. Appeal to the Popular • Idea is presented as acceptable because lot of people accept it. Appeal to Tradition • Idea is acceptable because it is true for the long time. Begging the Question • Assuming the thing or idea to be proven is true • Circular argument Cause-and-Effect • Assuming cause-and-effect relationship between unrelated events. Fallacy of Composition • Assuming that what is true for a part is true for the whole. Fallacy of Division • Assuming that what is true for the whole is true for its parts. BIAS • Personal views of a person presenting it. Correspondence Bias or Attribution effect
• Tendency to judge a person’s personality
by his or her actions, without regard for external factors or influences. Confirmation Bias • Tendency to look for and readily accept information which fits with one’s own belief or views and to reject ideas or views that go against it. Framing • Focusing on a certain aspect of a problem while ignoring other aspects. Hindsight • Tendency to see the past events as predictable, or to ascribe a pattern to a historical events. Conflict of Interest • A person or the group is connected to or has a vested interest in the issue being discussed. Cultural bias • Analyzing an event or issue based on one’s cultural standards.