Scribd
Upload
65 views

Sip Contest Criteria

The document outlines 7 criteria for evaluating student research proposals in an on-the-spot SIP making contest, including creative ability, scientific thought, research goals, thoroughness, and clarity. Each criteria contains 5 questions assessing different elements of the proposal, such as clearly stating the problem, having a procedural plan, and presenting data and conclusions clearly. Proposals will be judged on a 20% weighting for each of the 7 criteria.

Uploaded by

ENGRX44 NOTOGSW
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
65 views

Sip Contest Criteria

The document outlines 7 criteria for evaluating student research proposals in an on-the-spot SIP making contest, including creative ability, scientific thought, research goals, thoroughness, and clarity. Each criteria contains 5 questions assessing different elements of the proposal, such as clearly stating the problem, having a procedural plan, and presenting data and conclusions clearly. Proposals will be judged on a 20% weighting for each of the 7 criteria.

Uploaded by

ENGRX44 NOTOGSW
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

On the Spot SIP Making

Contest
2

CRITERIA
3

1. Does the research proposal


show creative ability and
originality in the:
a. questions asked? CREATIVE
b. approach to solving the ABILITY
problem? 20%
c. analysis of the data?
d. interpretation of the
data?
e. title, description and its
discussion?
4

1. Is the problems stated clearly


and unambiguously?
2. Was there a procedural plan
for obtaining a solution?
3. Are the variable clearly SCIENTIFIC
recognized and defined?
THOUGHT
4. If controls were necessary,
did the student recognized 20%
their need and and were
they used correctly?
5. Are there adequate data to
support the title?
5

1. Does the project have a clear


objective?
2. Is the objective relevant to the
potential user's needs? RESEARCH
3. Is the solution: workable?
Acceptable to the potential user? GOALS
Economically feasible and has
impact?
4. Could the solution be utilized
successfully in design or 20%
construction of an end product?
5. Is the solution a significant
improvement over previous
alternatives or application?
6

1. Was the purpose carried out to


completion within the scope of
the original intent?
2. How completely was the
problem covered?
THOUROUGH
3. Are the conclusions based on a
NESS
single experiment or
replication? 20%
4. How complete are the project
details?
5. Is the participant aware of
other approaches or theories?
7

1. How clearly does the participant


discuss his/her their project and
explain the purpose, procedure, and
conclusions?
2. Does the written material reflect the
participant’s understanding of the CLARITY
research? 20%
3. Are the important phases of the
project presented in an orderly
manner?
4. How clearly is the /ideasdata
presented?
8

You might also like