Chapter 1km
Chapter 1km
Management
Meaning
Drucker was the first to coin the term knowledge worker in the
early 1960s(Drucker 1964)
Senge(1990)focused on the learning organization as one that can
learn from past experiences stored in corporate memory
systems.
Nonaka and Takeuchi(1995) studied how knowledge is
produced,used and diffused within organizations and how this
contributes to the diffusion of innovation.
Technologies enable valuable knowledge to be remembered and
enable various knowledge to be published, that is widely
disseminated to all stakeholders.
Multidisciplinary nature of KM
Knowledge management draws upon a vast number of diverse fields such as:
Organizational science
Cognitive Science
Linguistic subject
Information technologies such as knowledge based systems, document and
information management and database management
Information and library science
Journalism
Education and training
Story telling and communication studies
Groupware such as intranet, extranet and other web technologies.
Data, Information, Knowledge
Drivers of KM/ Why is KM Important
today?
The major business drivers behind today’s increased interest in and
application of KM lie in four key areas:
1. Globalization of business: Organizations today are more global—
multisite, multilingual, and multicultural in nature.
2. Leaner organizations: We are doing more and we are doing it
faster, but we also need to work smarter as knowledge workers, adopting
an increased pace and workload.
3. “Corporate amnesia.” We are more mobile as a workforce, which
creates problems of knowledge continuity for the organization and places
continuous learning demands on the knowledge worker. We no longer
expect to spend our entire work life with the same organization.
4. Technological advances. We are more connected. Advances in
information technology not only have made connectivity omnipresent
but have radically changed expectations. We are expected to be “on” at
all times, and the turnaround time in responding is now measured in
minutes, not weeks.
Types of knowledge
1. Organizational Culture
Establish a culture that incentivizes knowledge-sharing behavior. Set
up monthly meetings, conferences, presentations, and other one-on-
one interviews with key people. Reduce attrition rates and retain
older employees to preserve the tacit knowledge of the company.
2. Mentorship programs
Encourage senior employees to train juniors have junior employees
participate in informal discussions with their superiors. Invite experts
to talk about concepts and share their real-life experiences with your
employees.
3. Workplace Collaboration
Encouraging teamwork and workplace collaboration helps in effective
knowledge sharing and management.
4. Documentation
Use technology, information and document management systems to store
knowledge in a structured manner for easy access. User guides, manuals,
how-to books, presentations, policies, and tutorials definitely help.
Each participant can take a turn contributing one good example of what
KM is and another example of what KM is not.
The entire group can then discuss this example– nonexample pair in order
to identify one (or several) key KM attributes.
Once the group members feel they have covered as much ground as they
are likely to, the key attributes can be summarized in the form of a KM
concept “formula” such as: “In our organization, knowledge management
must include the following: both tacit and explicit knowledge; a framework
to measure the value of knowledge assets; a process for managing
knowledge assets. . . .”
Expert Knowledge(kindly refer
page no:72&73 Awad text book
on KM))
Knowledge possessed by experts in a particular domain.
For example in the manufacturing sector, the value of nonphysical assets such as
just-in-time (JIT The idea is to receive production inputs only as needed in the
production process) inventory systems is rapidly providing more value. This is the
example of how intellectual asset, is considered more valuable in the organization
than the tangible asset
Intellectual assets are represented by the sum total of what employees of the
organization know and what they know how to do.
Similarly, traditionally, an airline organization’s assets included the physical
inventory of airplanes. Today, the airlines’ greatest asset is the SABRE
reservation system, software that enables the airline to manage the passenger
reservations and to implement a seat “yield management system.” The yield
management system is used to ensure that maximum revenue is generated from
each seat
From physical assets to knowledge assets
It should be noted that the more valuable a capability is and the less it is shared
among many employees, then the more vulnerable the organization becomes
should those employees leave.
From physical assets to
knowledge assets
The accounting profession still has considerable difficulty in
accommodating itself to these new forms of assets. Some
progress has been made for e.g., Skandia was the first
organization to report intellectual capital as part of its yearly
financial report, but much more work remains to be done in this
area.
KM for Individuals, Communities
and Organizations,
For the individual, KM:
Helps people do their jobs and save time through better decision
making and problem solving.
Builds a sense of community bonds within the organization.
Helps people to keep up to date.
For the community of practice(for the Professionals), KM:
Develops professional skills.
Promotes peer-to-peer mentoring.
Facilitates more effective networking and collaboration.
Develops a professional code of ethics that members can follow.
Develops a common language.
For the organization, KM:
Helps drive strategy.
Solves problems quickly.
Diffuses best practices.
Improves knowledge embedded in products and services.
Increases opportunities for innovation.
Enables organizations to stay ahead of the competition better.
Builds organizational memory.
Challenges in KM
facilitate cooperation,
help the organization to learn and make decisions based
on complete, valid, and well interpreted data,
information, and knowledge
Organizational Perspectives on
Knowledge Management
Wiig (1993) considers knowledge management in organizations
from three perspectives, each with different horizons and purposes:
1. Business Perspective—focusing on why, where, and to what
extent the organization must invest in or exploit knowledge.
2. Management Perspective—focusing on d, organizing,
directing, facilitating, and monitoring knowledge-related
practices and activities required to achieve the desired business
strategies and objectives.
3. Hands-on Perspective—focusing on applying the expertise
to conduct explicit knowledge-related work and tasks.