Organizational Culture, Conflict and Effectiveness
Organizational culture and climate are related concepts that influence employee behavior. Culture develops over time through shared values and beliefs, while climate reflects the current atmosphere. High morale exists when employee attitudes favor organizational goals, while low morale inhibits willingness to cooperate. There are various approaches to managing conflicts, including accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, competing, and compromising interests. Organizational effectiveness depends on how well an organization meets its objectives, while power and politics involve influencing others to pursue individual or group goals.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
284 views
Organizational Culture, Conflict and Effectiveness
Organizational culture and climate are related concepts that influence employee behavior. Culture develops over time through shared values and beliefs, while climate reflects the current atmosphere. High morale exists when employee attitudes favor organizational goals, while low morale inhibits willingness to cooperate. There are various approaches to managing conflicts, including accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, competing, and compromising interests. Organizational effectiveness depends on how well an organization meets its objectives, while power and politics involve influencing others to pursue individual or group goals.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24
Unit 5:- Organizational Culture
Conflict and Effectiveness
BBA Aviation 2nd Sem
Meaning and Definition of Organisational Culture • Organisation culture is the system of shared values and beliefs that influence workers behaviour. Organizational Culture Definition Organizational Climate
According to Campbell, “Organisational climate can
be defined as a set of attributes specific to a particular organisation that may be induced from the way that organisation deals with its members and its environment. Difference between organisational culture and climate Organisational Culture Organisational Climate • 1. Concept:Organisation • 1. Concept:Organisation culture, reflects the climate reflects current atmosphere of the atmosphere of the organisation which has organisation in which the evolved over a number of employees work. It provides years. opportunities to perform jobs according to the skills and a reward system which serves as motivators for employees Organisational Culture Organisational Climate 2. Perspective: 2. Perspective: It is short-term that defines its It is a broader framework that determines organisation day-to-day functioning. climate. 3. Evolution: 3. Evolution: It evolves according to needs of It evolves over a number of years the organisation to adapt to to earn goodwill and reputation. current environmental forces. 4. Manipulation: 4. Manipulation: It cannot be easily changed and It can be manipulated and manipulated. Changes are changed according to needs of introduced if absolutely the environment. necessary. 5. Focus: 5. Focus: It focuses on values and It focuses on current work norms of the organisation. practices of the organisation. Morale Definition • Morale is a way of describing how people feel about their jobs, employers and companies, and those feelings are tied to the behaviors and attitudes that employees exhibit in the workplace. • Flippo has described morale “as a mental condition or attitude of individuals and groups which determines their willingness to co-operate. Good morale is evidenced by employee enthusiasm, voluntary confirmation with regulations and orders, and a willingness to co-operate with others in the accomplishment of an organization’s objectives. Poor morale is evidenced by surliness, insubordination, a feeling of discouragement and dislike of the job, company and associates.” Types:
1. Individual and Group Morale:
Individual morale is a single person’s attitude towards work, environment etc. Whereas group morale reflects the general attitude of a group of persons. Group morale is everybody’s concern and may go on changing with the passage of time. Individual and group morale are interested but not necessarily identical. They have an effect on each other. The individual’s personal perception of the present conditions may be high but the group’s perception may be low or vice-versa. • 2. High or Low Morale: Morale may be referred to high morale or low morale. In the words of McFarland, high morale exists when employee attitudes are favourable to the total situation of a group and to the attainment of its objectives. Low morale exists when attitudes inhibit the willingness and ability of an organization to attain its objectives. The words such as zeal, enthusiasm, loyalty, dependability denote high morale. Low morale may be described by words like lack of interest, laziness, apathy, bickering, jealousy, quarrelsome, pessimism, etc. Conflict • Conflict is defined as a clash between individuals arising out of a difference in thought process, attitudes, understanding, interests, requirements and even sometimes perceptions. • According to Kolb and Bartinek, “conflict can be a disagreement, the presence of tension, or some other difficulty within or between two or more parties. Managing Conflicts • An accommodating manager is one who cooperates to a high degree. This may be at the manager's own expense and actually work against that manager's own goals, objectives, and desired outcomes. This approach is effective when the other person is the expert or has a better solution. • Avoiding an issue is one way a manager might attempt to resolve conflict. This type of conflict style does not help the other staff members reach their goals and does not help the manager who is avoiding the issue and cannot assertively pursue his or her own goals. However, this works well when the issue is trivial or when the manager has no chance of winning. • Collaborating managers become partners or pair up with each other to achieve both of their goals in this style. This is how managers break free of the win-lose paradigm and seek the win-win. This can be effective for complex scenarios where managers need to find a novel solution. • Competing: This is the win-lose approach. A manager is acting in a very assertive way to achieve his or her own goals without seeking to cooperate with other employees, and it may be at the expense of those other employees. This approach may be appropriate for emergencies when time is of the essence. • Compromising: This is the lose-lose scenario where neither person nor manager really achieves what they want. This requires a moderate level of assertiveness and cooperation. It may be appropriate for scenarios where you need a temporary solution or where both sides have equally important goals. Organizational Effectiveness • Organizational effectiveness can be defined as the efficiency with which an association is able to meet its objectives. ORGANIZATIONAL POWER AND POLITICS
• POWER: the capacity of a
person ,team or organization to influence others. • ORGANIZATIONAL POLITICS: Activities in which managers engage to increase their power and to pursue goals that favour their individual and group interests.