Example: Uniform Flow at Known Q and y

Water flows in a rectangular 6-ft-wide timber flume with n=0.013.

What channel slope is needed to convey water uniformly at 20 ft/s
when the depth is 3 ft?

1.49 2/3 1/2

V Rh So
n

Rh 
 6x3 ft 2
 1.50 ft
 3  6  3 ft

2
 nV    0.013  20 
2

So   2/3 
   0.0178
 1.49 Rh   1.49  1.50 
2/3
Example: Channel Characteristics and Uniform Depth

A channel has bed slope of 0.0006 and n=0.016. Find and plot Q vs. y,
considering depths of 2, 4, 6, and 8 ft.
1.49 2/3 1/2 1.49 2/3 1/2
V Rh So Q Rh So A
n n
A   10  2 y0  y0

Rh 
Aflow

 10  2 y0  y0
Pwetted 10  2 5 y0
 Example: Uniform Flow at Different Depths

2/3
1.49 2/3 1/2 1.49   10  2 y0  y0 
 0.0006   10  2 y0  y0 
1/ 2
Q Rh S o A   
n 0.016  10  2 5 y0 

y0 (ft) A (ft2) Pwetted (ft) Rh (ft) Rh2/3 Q (ft3/s) V (ft/s)

2 28 18.9 1.48 1.30 83 2.96
4 72 27.9 2.58 1.88 308 4.28
6 132 36.8 3.58 2.34 703 5.33
8 208 45.8 4.54 2.74 1298 6.24
 1400
1200
1000
800
Q (ft3/s)

600
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
y (ft)
 Wide and Shallow Flow
2/3
1.49 2/3 1/2 1.49   10  2 y0  y0 
 0.0006   10  2 y0  y0 
1/2
Q Rh So A   
n 0.016  10  2 5 y0 

If depth for a given flow rate is sought, T&E solution required.

However, if channel is very wide compared to its depth, we can
assume friction due to vertical components of bed is negligible. In
that case, Rh is independent of y0 , and y0 can be found directly:

Aflow by0 1 2/3 1/2 1 2/3 1/2 1 5/3 1/2

Rh    y0 Q  y0 So A  y0 So by0  y0 So b
Pwetted b n n n

3/5
 nQ 
y0   1/2 
 So b 
 Hydraulic Sections of a Circle

y  0.5D  1  cos    D sin 2   / 2 

D2  1 
A    sin 2 
4  2  D  sin 2 
Rh  1  
4 2 
P  D
 Example
A 6-ft diameter concrete pipe is laid on a slope of 0.001 and has uniform flow
at a depth of 4 ft. What is the discharge?

Approach #1

Solve for q: y  D sin 2   / 2 

y 4 ft
  2 arcsin  2 arcsin  1.91 rad  109.5o
D 6 ft
D  sin 2  6 ft  sin  2*1.91 
Solve for Rh: Rh  1   1    1.75 ft
4 2  4  2*1.91 

  6 ft  
2
D2  1 1 
Solve for A: A    sin 2    1.91  sin 
 2  1.91 
  20.0 ft 2

4  2  4  2 

1.49 2/3 1/2 1.49 ft 3

 1.75  0.001  20.0   105
2/3 1/2
Solve for Q: Q  Rh So A 
n 0.013 s
Approach #2
   
2
1.49 2/3 1/2 1.49  6 
2/3
 6 ft 3
 0.001 
1/2
Solve for Qfull: Q Rh So A      134
n 0.013  4  
 4  s

When depth of flow is 67%,

Q/Qfull is ~78%.

 ft 3  ft 3
Q  0.78 134   105
 s  s
 Example
What depth of flow would develop if the flow rate in the preceding example
increased to 120 ft3/s?

1.49 2/3 1/2

Approach #1 Q Rh So A
n
2/3
1.49  6  sin 2    62  1 
 0.001
1/2
120   1   4 2   sin 2 
0.013  4  2     

Solve for q by T&E or Solver, then substitute into: y  D sin   / 2 

2
Approach #2
Q 120 ft 3 /s
Compute Q/Qfull:  3
 0.90
Q full 134 ft /s

When Q/Qfull is 90%, y/yfull is

~75%.

y  0.75  6 ft   4.5 ft
 Best Hydraulic (Cross-)Section
1 2/3 1/2 1
V  Rh So Q  Rh2/3 So1/2 A
n n
For a given slope and roughness, velocity is maximized by maximizing
Rh. Equivalently, for a given slope, roughness, and cross-section, Q is
maximized by minimizing Pwetted.

The channel shape that yields this condition is called the best
hydraulic cross-section or the most efficient cross-section.
Absent other factors, the most efficient cross-section would be
preferred, although:
• Shallower designs are often preferred to reduce excavation costs
• Straight sides are usually easier (cheaper) to construct than curves
• High right-of-way costs favor deeper and narrower designs
From geometry, the shape with the largest Rh is a circle or half-circle.
That shape is practical for channels made of metals, but not other
materials.
Typically, wooden flumes are rectangular, and excavated canals are
trapezoidal. For such a trapezoidal channel:

Pwetted  b  2 y   my   b  2 y 1  m 2
2 2
A   b  my  y

A A
Rh  
Pwetted A
y

 y 2 1  m2  m 
Differentiate with respect to y or m to find optimum dimensional ratios.
For a given general shape, optimal ratios turn out to cause the channel
to be circumscribed by a semi-circle:

For the common

case of a trapezoidal
channel, optimum
slope is 60o:
Flow in Channels with Non-Uniform Roughness

Treat as a group of independent open channels in parallel, with

different y and Rh and n, but same So. Assume no resistance across
imaginary water-water boundaries.
 Example: Non-Uniform Roughness
w

d
a
b

For modeling purposes, a natural channel is being simulated using

the cross-section shown above, with gravel on the main stream bed
(n=0.025) and grass on the side slope (n=0.035). The bed slope is
0.006, and the dimensions shown are: a = 1m; b = 3m; d = 2m; w =
8m.
A hydrology model suggests that the 50-year storm could generate a
flow of 20 m3/s. Under those conditions, is the stream likely to
overflow the banks? If not, how deep will the flow be?
 Assuming the flow is high enough to overflow at least the rectangular
portion of the channel, we can model it as passing through two open-
channel systems in parallel.
For the left-hand channel, Aflow = by, and Pwetted = a + b + y. When the
channel is full, Aflow = bd = 6 m2, and Pwetted = a + b + d = 6 m.

For the right-hand channel, the side slope is the hypotenuse of a right
triangle, with the other sides having lengths of 1m (vertically) and 5m
(horizontally), so its full length is 5.10 m. This length is the wetted
perimeter of the right-hand channel when it is full; the corresponding
cross-sectional area is 0.5(d - a)(w - b), or 2.5 m2.
Thus, designating the left- and right-hand channels as L and R:

AL 6 m2 AR 2.5 m 2
Rh , L   1 m Rh , R    0.49 m
Pwetted , L 6m Pwetted , R 5.1 m
The flow in the whole channel when it flows full is therefore:

1 2/3 1/2 1 2/3 1/2

Qtot  Rh , L So AL  Rh , R So AR
nL nR

1 1
 1.0   0.006   6.0    0.49   0.006   2.5 
2/3 1/2 2/3 1/2

0.025 0.035
 22.0

The units are SI, so the flow when the channel is full is 22.0 m3/s, and
the 50-year storm is not expected to cause flooding.
As noted, when the channel is not full, the flow area and wetted
perimeter of the left-hand channel are: Aflow = by and Pwetted = a + b + y.

The lengths of all three sides of the right triangle characterizing the flow
area of the right-hand channel are smaller than when the channel if full
by a factor equal to (y - a)/(d - a) = (y - 1)/1 = y - 1. Thus:
AL by 3y
Rh , L   
Pwetted , L ab y 4 y
2
 ya 
 R , full    
2
AR   A  y  1 2.5 m 2

d a

 ya 
Pwetted , R   Pwetted , R , full   y  1  5.1 m 
d a
 y  1
2
AR AR , full
Rh , R     y  1  0.49 m 
Pwetted , R  y  1 Pwetted , R , full
 1 2/3 1/2 1 2/3 1/2
Qtot  Rh, L So AL  Rh , R So AR
nL nR
2/3
1  3y 
 0.006   3 y 
1/2
20   
0.025  4  y 

1
 y  1  0.49    0.006   y  1  2.5  

2/3 1/2 2

0.035  

Solving by T&E or Solver for y, we find y = 1.75 m.

 Gradually Varied Flow
If flow conditions change gradually, the Manning equation is
commonly used to represent the V-y-Sf relationship over stretches
where V and y do not change dramatically, using their average values
to compute Sf and hL.

Previously, we applied the energy equation for uniform flow between

two points on the water surface of an open channel. Defining z as the
elevation of the channel bottom, we found:

V12 V22
 z2  So L   y1   S f L  z2  y2 
2g 2g

E2  E1   So  S f  L
For a short reach of length Dl with gradually varying flow, we can write:

E2  E1   So  S f  l

E2  E1
l 
So  S f
where the overbar indicates an average value over Dl. Estimating the
average friction slope by using the Manning equation with average
values of V and Rh, we obtain and expression for the flow distance
required for a given change in E:
E2  E1
l  Include 1.49 only
  1.49 nV 
2
if using BG units.
So   2/3 
 Rh 
 Example. A smooth (n=0.012) rectangular channel with b = 6 ft and
So=0.002 supports a steady flow of 160 ft3/s. At one point in the
channel, the depth is 3.20 ft. Estimate the water depth for the reach
extending to 600 ft downstream.

Solution. We can set up a spreadsheet, considering small increments

in y and using the preceding equation to solve for the distance Dl
required for that Dy to occur.

y (ft) V (ft/s) P A Rh E DE Vavg Rh,avg Sf,avg DL L

3.20 8.332 12.40 19.20 1.548 4.278 0
3.22 8.282 12.44 19.32 1.553 4.285 0.00689 8.256 1.555 0.00245 13.46 13.46
3.24 8.230 12.48 19.44 1.558 4.292 0.00713 8.205 1.560 0.00241 15.21 28.67

3.44 7.752 12.88 20.64 1.602 4.373 0.00924 7.730 1.605 0.002063 95.91 444.46
3.46 7.707 12.92 20.76 1.607 4.382 0.00943 7.685 1.609 0.002032 147.35 591.81
 3.5

3.4

3.3
Depth (ft)

3.2

3.1

3.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Distance downstream (ft)

 Why does the water depth change so slowly downstream? What
depth will the stream ultimately reach if the shape and slope of the
channel remain constant?

Under uniform flow conditions:

2/3
 1.49 2/3 1/2  1.49  by 
Q  Vuniform Auniform  Rh S o   A     S o1/2  by0 
 n  n  b  2 y0 

2/3
1.49  6 y0 
 0.002   6 y0 
1/2
160   
0.012  6  2 y0 

y0  3.50