Performance Management & Competency Mapping
Performance Management & Competency Mapping
MAPPING
-Definition of performance Management, the
performance management contribution, dangers of
poorly implemented PM systems, aims and role of PM
Systems, characteristics of an ideal PM systems,
performance management process, performance
management and strategic planning.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Definition of performance Management:
Sally – Sales Manager.
Performance Management is a Continuous process of
identifying,mesuring,and developing the performance of individuals and
teams and aligning performance with the strategic goals of the
organization.
a.Continuos Process –
•Ongoing.
•setting goals and objectives Observing.
•GRF.
b.Alignment with strategic goals.
• Activities and o/p are congruent.
•Competitive advantage.
•direct link.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
• Distinguish between PMS & PA ( SW of employees).
• Merrill Lynch – Worlds leading financial management and advisory
companies.
• Conversation.
• January employee and Mgr set objectives.
• Mid-year review.
• End of the year review – evaluate progress & identifies areas that need
improvements.
• Siemens – German based.
• Setting clear measurable goals.
• Implementing concrete actions.
• Imposing rigorous consequences.
• Explicit employee contribution.
• Link between performance objectives and organizational goals
• Shared understanding.
• Survey conducted by Watson Wyatt.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
The performance Management contribution:
1.Motivation to perform is increased- feedback, knowledge.
2.Self-esteem is increased – Fulfills a basic human needs.
3.Managers gain insight about subordinate – Competency for
managers .
4.The definitions of job and criteria are clarified- behaviors
and results required of their specific position .
5.Self-insight and development are enhanced – development
activities & define future career path.
6.Administrative actions for more fair and appropriate – valid
information, air and credible basis.
7.Organizational goals are made clear – goals cascade down.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
1. RESULTS
• What needs to be done or the outcomes an employee must produce.
• Key accountability employee responsible for producing results.
• Specific objectives – statement of important measurable outcomes.
• Discussing performance standards –yardstick.
2. BEHAVIORS
• More emphasis give incomplete picture.
• For some jobs difficult to establish objectives, for other no control over the results.
• Competencies – measurable clusters of KSAs for eg: customer service.
• In certain cases behavior is given more importance over results.
3. DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• Agree on development plan
• Areas need improvement and setting goals to achieved.
• Include both results and behaviors.