Coordinating Conjunctions
Coordinating Conjunctions
Conjunctions
Definition
O Coordinating conjunctions (FANBOYS)
FOR AND NOR BUT OR YET
SO
O Coordinating conjunctions
join equals to one another:
words to words,
phrases to phrases,
clauses to clauses.
Examples
O
Word to word Most children like cookies
and milk.
O Examples:
Examples:
He is neither sane nor brilliant.
That is neither what I said nor what I meant.
It can be used with other negative expressions:
“That is not what I meant to say, nor should you
interpret my statement as an admission of guilt.”
It is possible to use nor without a preceding
negative element, but it is unusual and, to an
extent, rather stuffy:
George's handshake is as good as any written
contract, nor has he ever proven untrustworthy.
YET
The word YET functions sometimes as an adverb and has
several meanings: in addition ("yet another cause of trouble" or
"a simple yet noble woman"), even ("yet more expensive"), still
("he is yet a novice"), eventually ("they may yet win"), and so
soon as now ("he's not here yet"). It also functions as a
coordinating conjunction meaning something like "nevertheless"
or "but." The word yet seems to carry an element of
distinctiveness that but can seldom register.
John plays basketball well, yet his favorite sport is badminton.
The visitors complained loudly about the heat, yet they
continued to play golf every day.
In sentences such as the second one, above, the
pronoun subject of the second clause ("they," in this
case) is often left out. When that happens, the comma
preceding the conjunction might also disappear:
"The visitors complained loudly yet continued to
play golf every day."
Yet is sometimes combined with other
conjunctions, but or and. It would not be unusual to
see and yet in sentences like the ones above. This
usage is acceptable.
FOR
The word FOR is most often used as a preposition, of
course, but it does serve, on rare occasions, as a
coordinating conjunction. Some people regard the
conjunction for as rather highfalutin and literary, and it
does tend to add a bit of weightiness to the text.
Beginning a sentence with the conjunction "for" is
probably not a good idea, except when you're singing
"For he's a jolly good fellow. "For" has serious
sequential implications and in its use the order of
thoughts is more important than it is, say,
with because or since.
Its function is to introduce the reason for the
preceding clause: