Amity School of Physical

Education and Sports

Sciences

ODC PRESENTATION

BY
SURAJ SINGH PAWAR

GUIDE -DR.AJIT KUMAR

CO GUIDE – DR. PRASANT KUMAR DAS
ENROLLMENT NO- A3058313007
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Sports Facilities Among Different Government

and Private Schools Of Delhi And Their Impact
On Sports Promotion

..\operational definitions.docx 2
 VARIABLES SELECTED FOR THE STUDY
The following parameters of sports facilities were decided to be selected for the better
conduct of study:
• Sports equipments.
• Sports infrastructure.
• Human resources
• Organization/participation in sports events.
The scale consisted total of four parameters and each parameter have 16-30 items.
Each parameter further has three components for the better analysis of selected sports
facilities parameters.
• Frequency
• Quality
• Level of satisfaction
Each parameter has five levels of opinion regarding the Frequency of use, Quality and Level
of Satisfaction. Respondents can fill number (1-5) which represents level opinions for
frequency, Quality and Level of satisfaction. ( Frequency:“Never Used”, “almost never
used”, “Occasionally Used”, “Almost every time used” or “Frequently used”) (Quality:
“Poor”, “Fair”, “Good” , “Very good” or “Excellent”) ( Level of Satisfaction: :“Not
Satisfied”, “Slightly Satisfied”, “Moderately Satisfied”, “Very much Satisfied” or “
Extremely Satisfied”) according to their opinion or actual status of sports facilities in their
school. ..\thesis final form\reviews for presentation.docx
3
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
• To compare the status of selected sports equipments in government
and private schools of Delhi in terms of frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students.
• To compare the status of selected sports infrastructure in government
and private schools of Delhi in terms of frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students.
• To compare the status of selected human resources in government
and private schools of Delhi in terms of frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students.
• To compare the status of selected sports event organization and
participation in government and private schools of Delhi in terms of
frequency of use, quality and level of satisfaction of students.

4
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
OBJECTIVES CONTD.. Sciences

• To analyze the relationship between government and private schools

of Delhi of selected sports equipments in terms of frequency of use,
quality and level of satisfaction.
• To analyze the relationship between government and private schools
of Delhi of selected sports infrastructure in terms of frequency of use,
quality and level of satisfaction.
• To analyze the relationship between government and private schools
of Delhi of selected human resources in terms of frequency of use,
quality and level of satisfaction.
• To analyze the relationship between government and private schools
of Delhi of selected sports events organization and participation in
terms of frequency of use, quality and level of satisfaction.
• To assess the impact of selected parameters of sports facilities over
sports promotion in different government and private schools of Delhi.
5
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
LIMITATIONS Sciences

• Questionnaire research has its limitation. As such, any bias that might have
crept into the subject response on this account was considered as a
limitation of this study.

• Students perception towards sports facilities provided by their school

administration was consider as another limitation of this study.

6
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
DELIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
• The study was delimited to government, and private schools of Delhi
only.

• The study was further delimited to school students studying in class

nine to twelve.

• The study was also delimited to physical education teachers

working in government and private sector schools of Delhi.

7
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
SIGIFICANCE OF THE STUDY Sciences
• Based on findings government of Delhi may be able to assess ground reality
of the initiatives taken by them for promotion of sports in government
schools of Delhi.
• Findings may be helpful to assess the gap if any, within the policies
framework prepared by government of Delhi for development of physical
education and sports in schools of Delhi.
• Study may reveal the important facts in relation to the implementation of
schemes run time to time to provide better sports facilities by government of
NCT Delhi to the government schools of Delhi.
• The study may reveal many important facts regarding differences if any, in
frequency of use, quality and level of satisfaction of students towards sports
facilities provided by selected government and private schools of Delhi.
• The study will bring in to light necessary information regarding impact of
sports facilities and their relevance to sports promotion for enhancing
programs of physical education and sports in government and private
schools of Delhi.

8
 HYPOTHESIS
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
• There will be no significant difference between frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students for selected Sports Infrastructure
Parameter in Government and private schools of Delhi.
• There will be no significant difference between frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students for selected Sports Equipments Parameter
in Government and private schools of Delhi.
• There will be no significant difference between frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students for selected human resources parameter
in Government and private schools of Delhi.
• There will be no significant difference between frequency of use, quality and
level of satisfaction of students for selected Sports Event Organization
and participation Parameter in Government and private schools of Delhi.
• Frequency of use, quality and level of satisfaction of each item listed under
sports facilities parameters will be independent of schools type of Delhi
• Impact of sports facilities over sports promotion will be independent of
school type in Delhi.

..\thesis final form\reviews for presentation.docx 9

 METHODOLOGY
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sampling technique: Sciences
Sampling involved stratification of the government and private schools of Delhi as
per the division parliamentary electoral constituencies, which divide Delhi into
seven constituencies with number of schools in each constituency. Four
government and four private schools from each constituency were selected to be
the part of present study. Ten students and one physical education teacher from
each school were selected to be part of the present study.

Selection of Respondents: 560 students and 56 physical education teachers of

different government and private schools were selected for the study, which is of
different standards i.e. of X TO XII class. Ten students and one physical education
teacher from each school become part of the present study.

S. Unit of Sample Size of the Number of Number of Total number

No. Sample students each Teachers of subjects
school each school
Groups 56 10 1 616
1. Government Schools 28 10 1 308

10 1 308 10
2. Private Schools 28
 Flow Chart Showing Steps For construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Collection and screening Reliability of the scale
of the Items internal consistency
Cronbach’s Alpha

Scaling of the Items

The classification of
Items according to types
of styles and infirmity

Classification of items
Items Rejected not included in parameter of the
included in the study scale to measure utilization of
Logical review of
items sports facilities and sports
promotion in schools of Delhi.

The index of Item

Objectives Congruence
(IOC) of each item
Selected items included
for further study

11
 Construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
– Collection and screening of the Items.
• In the process of collection of items by the researcher three sources
namely: (1) Existing scale (2) The description of these areas in
psychology and available literature and documents (3) Discussion
with person working in the field, were used. For the present
investigation the second and third sources was fully utilized. The
researcher collected the available literature, past research studies
and documents on sports facilities and sports promotion. Further all
the things were discussed with the experts in the field of education,
and in evaluation. On the basis of the past research studies,
literature, documents and the discussion with experts’ person
working in this field, the researcher constructed 360 items for the
preparation of the scale to measure the frequency of use, Quality
and Level of satisfaction for each research parameter i.e. sports
equipments, sports infrastructure, sports personnel and sports
events organization and participation in schools of Delhi.
12
 Construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

• For constructing the items, it was observed that the items depicting
the facts should be included in the preparation. The formatting of the
items should be simple, so that even the beginner can read, and
understand the statements. Therefore, the items of tool were
presented in tabular form and only three common statements for all
the items were included for each parameter included in study. After
preparing the items, it is necessary to screen them form the view
point of wording and whether it draw out data for utility of sports
facilities and their impact on sports promotion. For this the
researcher with the help of guide screened the items. Certain items
were accepted and some were edited. In this way, 360 items were
selected to be the pre-pilot form the scale. The items were prepared
in English and thus the pre-pilot form the scale was prepared.

13
 Construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
• For the step of judges’ agreement of the pre-pilot form of the scale to
assess utility of sports facility and their impact on sports promotion, the list
of judges consisted of members from different walks of the life like,
educational officer, physical education teachers, assistant professors, and
Experts from Physical education field. The judges were requested to tick
mark (√) against the appropriate column whether they “accept” or
“Uncertain” or “reject” with each statement. Keeping in mind the item should
be helpful in providing data regarding utilization of sports facilities. Beside
this, the judges’ agreement was carried out under the objectives which are
given below:-
• To see whether selected parameters are appropriate for the study.
• To see whether the items can provide data regarding frequency of use,
quality and level of satisfaction.
• To see whether the data will be helpful in assessing the impact of sports
facilities over sports promotion.
• To see whether the instruction of the scale was proper.
• To see whether the illustration in the scale was perfect.
• To decide the total time would be required to administer the scale.
14
 Construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Sports Facilities Total No of Total No of Items selected

Parameters Items pre pilot for pilot form
form
Sports infrastructure 105 75
Sports Equipments 105 87
Human resources 102 75
Sports Events Organization 048 48
and participation

15
 Construction of tool
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Reliability of the scale.

• It is very essential to obtain the final evidence of the reliability of the scale.
Its means should be established; no matter how carefully the scale was
planned and prepared. It is therefore necessary that this step be performed,
to check and its’ results be reported to users of the test to enable them to
evaluate better. In short a scale must a scale must show sufficient
evidences of its reliability. A scale without the items of its reliability would be
of a little value.
Cronbach's N of
S.NO Sports Facilities Parameters Alpha Items
1 Reliability Statistics Equipments .981 75
2 Reliability Statistics Infrastructure .982 75
3 Reliability Statistics Organization and participation .960 48
4 Reliability Human Resources .979 87

16
 ADMINISTRATION OFAmity
TEST School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

• 616 questionnaires were distributed to the respondents as

mentioned above. Scholar visited personally and
established contact with the schools. Data was also
collected at the time of Zonal Sports Tournaments
conducted by Delhi Government for School Students in
each Zone.

• Along with a questionnaire, research scholar attached a

consent letter seeking their cooperation and requesting
them to furnish the necessary information true to their
knowledge wilingly.

17
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Statistics used for Data analysis

• To compare the status of each parameter between government and
private schools of Delhi Mann-Whitney Test was administered,
before administering Mann-Whitney test Two-Sample Kolmogorov-
Smirnov Test will also be administered to check the normality of the
obtained data. Further, the information collected through the
questionnaire was analyzed with the help of Chi square test for
assessing the relationship of each item listed below sports facilities
parameters to Government schools and Private Schools of Delhi
• Further to assess the impact of sports facilities researcher used
effect size with the help of Mann Whitney Z value

18
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Analysis of Data and Result of the study

The statistical tools used in the study to test the entire

hypothesis(s) were kolmogorov-smirnov test, mann
whiteny U test, Chi square test of independence, and
Effect Size power of the test. The rationale using these
statistical analysis tools stems from the fact, that the data
captured in the study for independent variables are
qualitative in nature and best suited for non-parametric
tests.

19
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Table Showing Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for normality of

Data
Events
Sports Sports organisation and
Equipments Infrastructure participation Human resources
FRQ QUL SAT FRQ QUL SAT FRQ QUL SAT FRQ QUL SAT
Most Absolute .468 .454 .429 .461 .386 .425 .514 .686 .504 .529 .514 .532
Extreme Positive .468 .454 .429 .461 .386 .425 .514 .686 .504 .529 .514 .532
Differences Negative .000 .000 .000 -.007 .000 .000 -.039 .000 -.036 -.061 -.061 -.014
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
5.536 5.367 5.071 5.451 4.564 5.029 6.085 8.113 5.958 6.254 6.085 6.296
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-
.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: School type

20
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on the Sports Infrastructure of

Government and Private schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use,
Quality, and Level of satisfaction of respondents

Sports Infrastructure Mann-Whitney

School Type N Mean Rank U Z score Sig
FRQUENCY Government 308 207.27
Private 308 353.73 18696.0 -10.72 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY Government 308 213.91
Private 308 347.09 20555.0 -9.76 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTION Government 308 206.38
Private 308 354.62 18446.0 -10.85 0.001
Total 616
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

21
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on the Sports Equipments of Government and
Private schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use, Quality, and Level of
satisfaction of respondents

Sports Equipments
School Type N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z score Sig
FRQUENCY Government 308 210.15
Private 308 350.85 19502.5 -10.31 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY Government 308 201.48
Private 308 359.52 17074.0 -11.56 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTION Government 308 205.68
Private 308 355.32 18251.5 -10.95 0.001
Total 616
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

22
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on the Human Resources of Government and Private
schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use, Quality, and Level of satisfaction of
respondents

Sports Personnel
School Type N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z score Sig
FRQUENCY 1.00 308 196.14
2.00 308 364.86 15578.5 -12.35 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY 1.00 308 203.01
2.00 308 357.99 17504.0 -11.34 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTION 1.00 308 194.41
2.00 308 366.59 15095.0 -12.39 0.001
Total 616
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

23
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on the Sports Events Organization and Participation
of Government and Private schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use,
Quality, and Level of satisfaction of respondents

Sports Events
organisation and
participation School Type N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z score Sig
FRQUENCY 1.00 308 206.68
2.00 308 354.33 18529.0 -10.82 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY 1.00 308 164.61
2.00 308 396.39 6750.5.0 -16.95 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTION 1.00 308 201.32
2.00 308 359.68 17029.0 -11.60 0.001
Total 616
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

24
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on Sports Facilities of Government and Private schools
of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use, Quality, and Level of satisfaction of Physical
education Teachers

Sports Sports Equipments Human Resources Sports Events

Infrastructure
Mea Mea Mann Asymp
Mann- Asymp. Mann- Asymp. Mann- Asymp.
n Mean Mean n - . Sig.
N Whitne Sig. (2- Whitney Sig. (2- Whitney Sig. (2-
School Ran Rank Rank Ran Whitn (2-
yU tailed) U tailed) U tailed)
Type k k ey U tailed)
Govt 28 18 24 20 22
104 .000 264 .036 142 .000 202 .002
Freq Private 28 39 33 37 35
Total 56
Govt 28 23 20 20 17
Private 244 145 158 57
Qual 28 34 .015 37 .000 37 .000 40 .000
Total 56
Govt 28 21 22 19 20
Private 169 203 139 143
Satis 28 36 .000 35 .002 38 .000 37 .000
Total 56
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

25
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on Sports Facilities of Physical education Teachers and
Students of Government schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use, Quality, and
Level of satisfaction

Sports Infrastructure Sports Equipments Human resources Sports Events

Asym Asym Asym Asym
Mann- Mann- Mann- Mann-
Grouping Mean p. Sig. Mean p. Sig. Mean p. Sig. Mean p. Sig.
type N Whitne Whitne Whitne Whitne
Rank (2- Rank (2- Rank (2- Rank (2-
yU yU yU yU
tailed) tailed) tailed) tailed)
Students 280 156 153 154 154
Frequen 3579 .444 3373 .222 3869 .908 3857 .887
Teachers 28 142 174 156 157
cy
Total 308
Students 280 156 155 155 154
3629 .513 3888 .943 3838 .854 3910 .982
Quality Teachers 28 144 153 152 155
Total 308
Students 280 155 154 155 155
Satisfacti 3835 .848 3669 .573 3758 .715 3740 .685
Teachers 28 151 163 149 148
on
Total 308
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance

26
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Results of the Mann Whitney U Test on Sports Facilities of Government and
Private schools of Delhi with respect to Frequency of use, Quality, and Level of
satisfaction of Physical education Teachers

Sports Infrastructure Sports Equipments Human resources Sports Events

Man
Mann- Asymp. Mea Mann- Asymp. Mea Mann- Asymp. n- Asymp.
Grouping Mean Mean
type N Whitney Sig. (2- n Whitne Sig. (2- n Whitne Sig. (2- Whit Sig. (2-
Rank Rank
U tailed) Rank yU tailed) Rank yU tailed) ney tailed)
U
Teachers 28 169 151 164 188
3511 .362 3829 .838 3649 .546 2979 .036
Freq Students 280 153 155 154 151

Total 308
Teachers 28 133 173 155 178
Quali 3321 .182 3412 .258 3909 .980 3259 .141
Students 280 157 153 154 152
ty
Total 308
Teachers 28 139 154 163 166
3485 .333 3916 .992 3684 .599 3598 .473
Satis Students 280 156 155 154 153
Total 308
*Significant at 0.05 level of significance
27
 Chi square test
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Non Parametric Association Of Schools With Response Received For Variables Related To
Frequency Of Use Of Sports Infrastructure
Athletic track
Almost Never Occasionally Almost Every
Never Use Use Use Time Use Frequently Use Total
school Govt schools Count 72 89 99 19 1 280
type Expected
Count 46.5 60.0 107.0 40.0 26.5 280.0

Residual
25.5 29.0 -8.0 -21.0 -25.5
Private Count 21 31 115 61 52 280
Schools
Expected
Count 46.5 60.0 107.0 40.0 26.5 280.0

Residual -25.5 -29.0 8.0 21.0 25.5

Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.283E2a 4 .000
Likelihood Ratio 146.757 4 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 121.657 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 560
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 26.50.

..\thesis final form\Chapter IV.docx 28

 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Effect size for the variable sports

infrastructure

Sports School Mann-

InfrastructureType N Mean Rank Whitney U Z score Sig Effect size
FRQUENCY Governme
308 207.27
nt 0.43
Private 308 353.73 18696.0 -10.72 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY Governme
308 213.91
nt 0.39
Private 308 347.09 20555.0 -9.76 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTIO Governme
308 206.38
N nt 0.43
Private 308 354.62 18446.0 -10.85 0.001
Total 616

29
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Effect size for the variable sports equipments

Sports School Mann- Effect

Equipments Type N Mean Rank Whitney U Z score Sig size
FRQUENCY Governmen
308 210.15
t 0.41
Private 308 350.85 19502.5 -10.31 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY Governmen
308 201.48
t 0.46
Private 308 359.52 17074.0 -11.56 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTIO Governmen
308 205.68
N t 0.44
Private 308 355.32 18251.5 -10.95 0.001
Total 616

30
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Effect size for the variable Human resources Sciences

Sports Personnel Mann-Whitney

School Type N Mean Rank U Z score Sig Effect size
FRQUENCY 1.00 308 196.14
0.48
2.00 308 364.86 15578.5 -12.35 0.001
Total 616
QUALITY 1.00 308 203.01
0.45
2.00 308 357.99 17504.0 -11.34 0.001
Total 616
SATISFACTION 1.00 308 194.41
0.48
2.00 308 366.59 15095.0 -12.60 0.001
Total 616

31
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Effect size for the variable sports events organisation and participation

Sports Events
organisation and Mann-Whitney
participation School Type N Mean Rank U Z score Sig Effect size
FRQUENCY 1.00 308 206.68
18529.0 -10.82 0.001 0.43
2.00 308 354.33
Total 616
QUALITY 1.00 308 164.61
6750.5.0 -16.95 0.001 0.68
2.00 308 396.39
Total 616
SATISFACTION 1.00 308 201.32
17029.0 -11.60 0.001 0.46
2.00 308 359.68
Total 616

32
 fre
qu
en
cy
of
us
e
of
le s
ve po
lo qu rts
fs al in
it

0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8

0
at
is y fra
fa of st
ct s ru
io po ct
n rts ur
e
to in

0.43
wa fra
fre rd
qu s st
ru
en sp ct
cy or ur
of
ts e
in
us fra 0.39
e st
of ru
le s ct
ve po ur
lo qu rts e
0.43

fs al eq
at it y ui
is of pm
fa
ct p s en
io ts
fre n or
t s
to
0.41

qu eq
en wa
cy rd ui
of s pm
sp en
cl or ts
as ts
0.46

qu se eq
al s ui
it y wi pm
le o th en
ve fc hu
lo la m ts
ss
0.44

fs an
at es re
is wi so
fa th ur
ct h
io ce
n um s
to
0.48

wa an
rd re
s so
ur
cl ce
as
s s
0.45

fre es
qu co
en nd
cy uc
of te
le sp d
0.48

ve or
lo qu t s
fs al ev
Effect size of selected sports facilities variables

at ity en
is of ts
fa
ct sp
0.43

io
n or
ts
to ev
wa
rd en
s ts
sp
0.68

or
ts
ev
en
ts
0.46
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

33
 Conclusions Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences
Based on the interpretation of collected data, findings, discussion, and support drawn from the
relevant literature, following conclusions are drawn:

1. It may be concluded from obtained results that students and teachers perception towards the
status of frequency of use, quality and level of satisfaction has no any differences in
teachers and students of government schools but the situation is a little different in private
schools where students have a different opinion from their teachers in relation to the variable
frequency of sports events organization/ participation (Significant Difference), whereas their
opinion about the other variables are almost similar (No significant Difference)
2. It may be concluded from the results obtained that sports infrastructures are used more
frequently in private schools as compared to government schools. In general, Infrastructure
provided by private schools to their students is of better quality than of government schools
and lastly students of private schools are much satisfied than students of government
schools with the frequency of use and quality of sports infrastructure provided to them.
3. It may be concluded that sports equipments are used more frequently in private schools as
compared to government schools. In general, equipments provided by private schools to
their students are of better quality than of government schools. Moreover, students of private
schools are much satisfied than students of government schools with the frequency of use
and quality of sports equipments provided to them.
34
 Conclusions Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

4. It may be concluded that students of private schools having more frequency of classes as
compared to government schools. In general, Quality of classes conducted in private
schools for their students are of better quality than of government schools and lastly
students of private schools are much satisfied than students of government schools with
the sports personnel of their respected school.
5. It may be concluded that sports events takes place more frequently in private schools as
compared to government schools. In general, Quality of sports events organised in private
schools for their students is better than of government schools moreover, students of private
schools are much satisfied than students of government schools with the sports events
organised for them.
6. It may be concluded from Non parametric association of data that each item listed under
selected sports facilities variables is significantly associated with the school type i.e.
Government schools and Private schools.
7. Based on findings of effect size it may be concluded that most of the variables selected for
present study show significant differences with a small effect size while assessing both the
school types, however variable frequency of sports events organizing and participation
depicts a medium effect size along with statistical significant differences.

35
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

Recommendations

Based on the conclusion drawn from data interpretation, findings, discussion,

and support of relevant literature, following recommendations are in position for
consideration:

• Study shows frequency of use of sports infrastructure and sports equipments is

less in comparison to private schools of Delhi so it is recommended to
increase the use of available sports facilities in government schools of Delhi.

• Study reveals that in general, quality of sports facilities provided by

government schools is on lower scale in comparison to private schools of
Delhi. So, on the basis of findings it is recommended to improve the quality of
sports facilities provided by government schools of Delhi.

36
 Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Recommendations Sciences

• Furthermore, findings shows that frequency of sports events organization and participation
is less in comparison to private schools of Delhi, so it is recommended to increase the no
of sports events organization and participation in government schools of Delhi. Moreover,
findings shows that in general, private schools of Delhi organize sports events of better
quality than compared to government schools so it is recommended to government schools
of Delhi to improve the quality of sports events organization and participation.

• Some experimental studies could be designed considering the same dependant variables
and introducing one or more independent variables in the research design such as summer
camp, sports oriented timetable, incentives and awards for excelling in sports.

• Similar study could be possible adding few more variable, Socio economic condition,
gender condition and age in the research design to find more insightful outcomes.

• Longitudinal study could be done in possible consideration of results of sports events

participation throughout year, in the research design to find more insightful outcomes
regarding impact of utilization of sports facilities.
37
Amity School of Physical
Education and Sports
Sciences

38