Collision Mittigation System
Collision Mittigation System
SYSTEM
PRESENTED BY
GAUTHAM T
REG NO:17051166
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
RELEVANCE
METHODOLOGY
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGE
S
CONCLUSION
REFERENCE
INTRODUCTION
The modern automobile companies are introducing new
technologies to make the driver and passengers safety
Some of the safety systems are ABS CBS CMBS etc...
Vehicle dynamic control system (VDCS) exist on most
modern vehicle play important role in vehicle ride
stability and safety
Aim of VDCS system in vehicle is to enhance vehicle
crash charactristics
Improve the response in case of vehicle to vehicle crash
scenario
RELEVANC
E for Highway Safety, vehicles with
According to the Institute
collision avoidance systems are involved in fewer accidents and
injury-related car crashes.
This safety technology is proven to reduce serious car accidents,
injuries, and fatalities.
METHODOLOGY
The vehicle frontal collision can be divided in to two primary
impact and secondary impact
In the system there are four shock absorber unit is provided in
bumber part of the vehicle to absorb the collision energy
During the sudden collision of the vehicle most of the primary
impact is absorbed by spring provided in the front body
Their by the secondary impact will be reduced and the occupent
will become effortless during the collision
ADVANTAGE
S
The occupant in the vehicle much safer than other system
because of the 50-75% of primary impact will absobed by
the system
The ABS,CBC,CMBS, are co-stimulated system
The construction of the system structure is simple compared
to other system
DISADVANTAGE
The system only can be used with the vehicle have
integrated body structure
It is very costly for installation
This system is only applicable for collision depended
accidents
CONCLUSION
• The main reason for introducing collision mitigation system is
to increase overall safety
It serves as a reliable and efficienct system for efficient safety
This model presented here would be very useful early design stages
for accessing the crash worthiness performance of the vehicle and for
selecting appropriate vehicle parameters
REFERENCE
Alleyne, A., 1997. Improved vehicle performance using
combinedsuspension and braking forces. Vehicle System Dynamics
27(4), 235e265.
Alleyne, A., Hedrick, J.K., 1995. Nonlinear adaptive control ofactive
suspensions. IEEE Transactions on Control SystemsTechnology 3 (1),
94e101.
Bang, M.S., Lee, S.H., Han, C.S., et al., 2001.
Performanceenhancement of a sliding mode wheel slip controller by
theyaw moment control. Proceedings of the Institution ofMechanical
Engineers Part D: Journal of AutomobileEngineering 215 (4),
455e468.
Celentano, G., Iervolino, R., Porreca, S., et al., 2003. 2003. Car
brakesystem modeling for longitudinal control design. In:
IEEEConference on Control Applications