TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

CUBAO, QUEZON CITY

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING

DESIGN OF FLOOD
CONTROL SYSTEM ALONG
SAN JUAN RIVER AND
DILIMAN CREEK AT BRGY.
ROXAS, QUEZON CITY
Presented by: Julongbayan, Alavata, Bajo, Felicia
THE PROBLEM
Inland flood at Barangay
Roxas due to overflow of San
Juan River and Diliman Creek.

.
GMA NEWS, 2014
THE PROBLEM

.
PROJECT Barangay Roxas

LOCATION Located along San Juan River and Diliman Creek

 THE CLIENT
DPWH and
Capt.Gotdalera
Carmela

DETAILS
• In the past few years one of the
problems that the barangay
encountered is flood
•
.
The client has a budget of
Php.250,000,000.00
 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

G e n e r a l O b j e c ti v e

To design an effective flood control that

mitigates overflow of San Juan River and
Diliman Creek along Barangay Roxas
during
Presentations are
communication tools peak discharge
Presentations are
communication tools . .
that can be demonstrations that can be demonstrations
 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

S p e c i fi c O b j e c ti v e s

• To calculate design flood that are expected to handle

through designed life.
• To provide design plans for the flood control
structures and river modifications.
• To increase the river discharge capacity.
• To prevent bank collapse.
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

Scope
• Modifications of the two bodies of water are included.
• Estimates for the cost of operation and construction.
• Manual calculation of design data using empirical and
statistical methods.
• Hydraulic and structural analysis using software.
• Design calculations of the flood control structures.
• Final drawings and specifications of plans for the design.
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS

L i m i t a ti o n s
• Detailed activities of the construction are not included.
• The design covers only the San Juan River and Diliman
creek that are bounded along Barangay Roxas.
• The areas bounded by Barangay Roxas is to be
protected.
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
 DESIGN INPUTS

Population, Land Area and Boundaries

(Source: Quezon City Barangay Operation Center)
 DESIGN INPUTS

River Data (Source: DPWH-QC 2nd District)

DESIGN INPUTS

River Data (Source: DPWH-QC 2 District)

nd
 DESIGN INPUTS

Elevation Map (Source: topographic-map.com)

 DESIGN INPUTS
25 Year Flood Hazard Map (Source :Nationwide
Operational Assessment of Hazards (NOAH) )
 DESIGN INPUTS
Flood Prone Areas (Source: Quezon City Barangay Operation Center)
 DESIGN INPUTS

Rainfall Intensity (Source: PAGASA) )

T (yrs) 10 mins 20 mins 30 mins 1 hr 2 hrs 3 hrs 6 hrs 12 hrs 24 hrs

2 138.0 100.2 82.3 55.5 38.3 30.1 19.6 11.4 6.5

5 188.4 136.6 115.2 81.8 56.6 45.2 30.8 18.0 10.1
10 221.8 160.7 136.9 99.3 68.7 55.3 38.3 22.4 12.5
15 240.7 174.2 149.2 109.1 75.6 60.9 42.5 24.9 13.9
20 253.8 183.8 157.8 116.0 80.4 64.9 45.5 26.6 14.8
25 264.0 191.1 164.4 121.3 84.0 67.9 47.7 28.0 15.6
50 295.3 213.6 184.8 137.6 95.4 77.3 54.7 32.1 17.8
100 326.4 236.0 205.0 153.8 106.7 86.6 61.7 36.2 20.1
 DESIGN INPUTS
Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency Curve
(Source: PAGASA) )
 DESIGN INPUTS
San Juan River Basin Catchment Area (Source:
Japan International Cooperation Agency)
 DESIGN INPUTS
Catchment Area and Land-cover statistics (Source: City Environment and
Natural Resources Office (CENRO))
 DESIGN INPUTS

Manning’s Coefficient of Roughness (Source: Water Resources

Engineering by Larry W. Mays)
DESIGN INPUTS
 DESIGN INPUTS
Borehole Location (Source: Google Maps)
 DESIGN INPUTS
Borehole Data (Source: Bureau of Soils and Water Management)
BH-3
Depth, m USCS Classification SPT N-Value
1.0 – 2.0 Silt Loam 7
2.0 – 3.0 Silt Loam 9
3.0 – 7.0 Silty Clay Loam 44
8.0 – 11.0 Clay Loam 28
11.9 – 12.0 Siltstone 73
 DESIGN INPUTS
Subsurface Idealization of the Borehole
Depth (m) Unit Weight (KN/m3) Angle of Friction (ó) Cohesion (c’)

1-2 16.10 31 0

2-3 17.41 34 0

3-7 20.58 41 45

8-11 20.11 39 55

11.9-12 21.99 45 0
 DESIGN INPUTS
Rational Method (Source: Design Guidelines, Criteria and Standards
Volume 3, Water Engineering Projects 2015 (DGCS))
 

 
𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 :
𝑸=𝑺𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒘𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑫𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒆
 

𝑪=𝑪𝒐𝒆𝒇𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒖𝒏 −𝒐𝒇𝒇

 

𝑨=𝑪𝒂𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒏

 
 DESIGN INPUTS
Coefficient of Runoff (Source: Design Guidelines, Criteria and
Standards Volume 3, Water Engineering Projects 2015 (DGCS))
Land Use Minimum Maximum
Residential Area – Densely Built 0.50 0.75
Residential Area – Not Densely Built 0.30 0.55
City Business District 0.70 0.95
Light Industrial Areas 0.50 0.80
Heavy Industrial Areas 0.60 0.90
Parks, Playgrounds, Cemeteries, Unpaved Open spaces and vacant lots 0.20 0.30
Concrete or Asphalt Pavement 0.90 1.00
Gravel Surfaced Road and Shoulder 0.30 0.60
Rocky Surface 0.70 0.90
Bare Clay Surface (face of slips, etc.) 0.70 0.90
Forested Land (sandy to clay) 0.30 0.50
Flattish Cultivated Areas (not flooded) / Farmland 0.30 0.50
Steep or Rolling Grassed Areas/ Steep Gullies not heavily timbered 0.50 0.70
Flooded or Wet Paddies 0.70 0.80
 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
Structural Context
(Quantitative)

Economic Sustainability Constructabilit Risk Assessment

Constraint Constraint y Constraint Constraint

Material Maintenance Labor and Safety Cost and

Cost Cost Equipment Cost Accidents
 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
Structural Context
(Qualitative)

Functionality Constraint Regulation Constraint

. .
.
 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS

Water Resources Engineering Context

(Quantitative)
Economic Sustainability Constructabilit Risk Assessment
Constraint Constraint y Constraint Constraint

Material Maintenance Labor and Safety Cost and

Cost Cost Equipment Cost Accidents
 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
Water Resources Engineering Context
(Qualitative)

Functionality Constraint Ergonomics Constraint

. .
.
STRUCTURAL CONTEXT TRADE-
OFFS

STEEL SHEET CANTILEVER G R AV I T Y

PILES R E TA I N I N G WA L L R E TA I N I N G WA L L
The most popular type of sheet It is used as a low-cost solution for Gravity Walls is a retaining wall that
piles used today for earth low land that is near the river and depends on its self-weight. The soil
preservation and excavation aid is helps to prevent erosion in the area that is on the other side of the wall
steel sheet piles. where waves are present. also helps to resist the lateral forces.
 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING CONTEXT
TRADE-OFFS

CHANNELING FLOOD-BARRIER D E T E N T I O N TA N K

Channeling refers to the systematic The flood barriers will be a fixed Detention Tanks are barriers with
removal of accumulated material from in place flood barrier with a pipe holes built to provide another
river or other watercourse channels material of aluminum to be route for excess water to mitigate
and make a desired channel for the installed when water is arising flooding effects further and restore
river or creek from the river or creek. rivers to their natural water level.
 DESIGNER’S RAW RANKING

After considering the design constraints and

trade-offs, the designers came up with the
raw rankings. In which it discusses on how
the designers came up with the raw ranking
values.
 INITIAL ESTIMATES
STRUCTURAL CONTEXT
TRADE-OFFS
CONTEXT CONSTRAINTS Cantilever Gravity
Steel Sheet Pile
Retaining Wall Retaining Wall
ECONOMIC (Php) PHP 82,133,200.00 PHP 11,128,160.00 PHP 31,272,600.00
SUSTAINABILITY PHP 26,657,838.55 PHP 2,687,940.06 PHP 7,293,672.47
(Php)
STRUCTUR
CONSTRUCTABIL PHP 1,073,120.00 PHP 15,310,000.00 PHP 41,207,880.00
AL
CONTEXT ITY (Php)
RISK
ASSESSMENT PHP 99,425.48 PHP 441,240.56 PHP 456,244.72
(Php)
 INITIAL ESTIMATES
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
CONTEXT TRADE-OFFS
CONTEXT CONSTRAINTS Dike with
Channeling Flood-Barrier
Detention Tank
ECONOMIC (Php) PHP 404,262.89 PHP 468,423.15 PHP 4,399,388.25
SUSTAINABILITY
PHP 63,163,379.6 PHP 86,142.15 PHP 412,934.48
WATER (Php)
REOURCES CONSTRUCTABILI PHP 2,695,085.93 PHP 353,700.97 PHP 1,348,038.41
ENGINEERIN TY (Php)
G
RISK
ASSESSMENT PHP 58,820.16 PHP 39,297.36 PHP 196,185.23
(Php)
 Ability to satisfy the criterion
CRITERION’S
CRITERIA Cantilever Gravity Retaining
IMPORTANCE Steel Sheet Pile
Retaining Wall Wall

Economic 10 1.3549 10 3.5584

Sustainability 9 0.008311 10 2.6853

Constructability 10 10 0.7001 0.2604

Risk Assessment 8 10 0.2533 0.1792

OVER-ALL RANK 177.6238 190.0274 63.7893

INITIAL RAW RANKING

STRUCTURAL TRADE-OFFS
 Ability to satisfy the criterion
CRITERION’S
CRITERIA Dike with
IMPORTANCE Channeling Flood-Barrier
Detention Tank

Economic 10 10 8.6303 0.9189

Sustainability 10 0.01314 10 2.0092

Constructability 10 1.3124 10 2.6238

Risk Assessment 10 1.2798 10 0.3837

OVER-ALL RANK 126.0534 386.303 59.356

INITIAL RAW RANKING

WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
TRADE-OFFS
 STRUCTURAL

FINAL ESTIMATES
TRADE-OFFS
CONTEXT CONSTRAINTS Cantilever Gravity Retaining
Steel Sheet Pile
Retaining Wall Wall

PHP 200,081,365.23 PHP 60,189,930.68 PHP 88,023,787.50

ECONOMIC (Php)      
PHP 31,251,504.78 PHP 9,701,689.60 PHP 13,624,768.13
SUSTAINABILITY (Php)      
STRUCTUTAL
CONTEXT COSTRUCTABILITY PHP 8,262,000.00 PHP 4,488,000.00 PHP 2,808,000.00
(Php)      
RISK ASSESSMENT PHP 10,417,168.26 PHP 3,233,896.53 PHP 4,541,589.38
(Php)      
 WATER RESOURCE

FINAL ESTIMATES
TRADE-OFFS
CONTEXT CONSTRAINTS Dike with Detention
Channeling Flood-Barrier
Tank
PHP 9,858,449.28 PHP 38,807,366.87 PHP 15,439,574.28
ECONOMIC (Php)      
PHP 1,581,197.75 PHP 8,014,179.17 PHP 2,598,356.14
WATER SUSTAINABILITY (Php)      
REOURCES PHP 682,869.02
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTABILITY  
PHP 2,601,518.40 PHP 1,882,800.00
(Php)  
   

RISK ASSESSMENT PHP 527,065.92 PHP 2,671,393.06 PHP 866,118.71

(Php)      
FINAL RAW RANKING
STRUCTURAL TRADE-OFFS
Ability to satisfy the criterion
CRITERION’S
CRITERIA Cantilever Gravity Retaining
IMPORTANCE Steel Sheet Pile
Retaining Wall Wall

Economic 10 3.0083 10 6.8379

Sustainability 9 2.1044 10 6.1206

Constructability 10 3.3987 6.2587 10

Risk Assessment 8 1.1044 10 5.1206

OVER-ALL RANK 91.8448 332.587 264.4292
FINAL RAW RANKING
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
TRADE-OFFS Ability to satisfy the criterion
CRITERION’S
CRITERIA Dike with
IMPORTANCE Channeling Flood-Barrier
Detention Tank

Economic 10 10 2.5404 6.3852

Sustainability 10 10 1.9730 6.0854

Constructability 10 10 2.6249 3.6269

Risk Assessment 10 10 1.9730 6.0854

OVER-ALL RANK 400 91.113 221.829
WINNING TRADE-OFF
FOR STRUCTURAL
CONTEXT
Concrete
Cantilever
Retaining Wall
WINNING TRADE-OFF
WATER RESOURCES
ENGINEERING CONTEXT
Channeling
 DESIGN
SPECIFICATIONS
Wa t e r R e s o u r c e s Principles of
D G C S Vo l . 3 Wa t e r Foundation
Engineering Projects Engineering 2nd
Edition Engineering
2015 7 . Edition
th
L a r r y W. M a y s
Braja M. Das
 THANK YOU. 

GROUP
MEMBERS:
1.Julongbayan, Diel

2.Alavata, Paul
3.Bajo, Jhon Darlyn
4.Felicia, Gillian