Assessment Modified and Improved by Mr. Lintang
Assessment Modified and Improved by Mr. Lintang
OF LEARNING
IMPORTANCE OF
ASSESSMENT
SKILL;
PERFORMANCE MOTIVATION,
EFFORT
ASSESSMENT PRINCIPLES
1. ADDRESS LEARNING TARGETS/CURRICULAR GOALS
*cognitive*psychomotor*affective
2. PROVIDE EFFICIENT FEEDBACK ON INSTRUCTION
*satisfactory(proceed to next) *unsatisfactory(reteach)
3. USE A VARIETY OF ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES
*knowledge * skills *attitudes
4. ENSURE THAT ASSESSMENTS ARE VALID, RELIABLE, FAIR AND USABLE,
Valid- reflects PURPOSE of the test
Reliability- yields CONSISTENCE on the results
Fair- fee from BIASES
Usability- PRACTICABILITY, coverage, convenience, economical
•Objectives
•Reliable
•Multidimensional in structure
•Measures knowledge, skills and values
•Value-laden
FOUR KINDS OF STANDARD (ZAIS,
1976)
1.Learning outcomes
-- ends results of instruction
2.Learning activities
-- means to an ends
Component:
*behavioral- observables(include blooms taxonomy) and non-observables
(know, appreciate, understand, value: to develop which are so general)
•Content– specify the topic expected to learn.
•* condition– words such, given, using, etc…
•* criterion level– examples 75/100 acceptable level of performance
Diagnostic: tell us what
the student needs to learn
1. PRIOR TO INSTRUCTION
2. DURING INSTRUCTION
3. AFTER INSTRUCTION
Paper and pencil assessments:
Ask students to respond in writing to questions
or problem
-item level: assessing lower vs. higher skills
-knowledge vs, application, analysis synthesis
and evaluation
-authentic tasks
e.g. multiple choice, t/f, matching type
(metacognition),short answer, essay (recall)
Strengths:
-can cover a lot of material reasonably well
-fair
-effective in assessing declarative knowledge
of content
-easier to construct and administer
Than performance assessments
WEAKNESSES:
TYPES OF PERFORMANCES:
PRODUCTS: DRAWINGS, SCIENCE
EXPERIMENTS, TERM PAPERS, POEMS,
SOLUTION TO AUTHENTIC PROBLEMS