Control Systems and Engineering Lesson 4
Control Systems and Engineering Lesson 4
&
Block Diagram Reduction
Lecture 4
1
Poles of a Transfer Function
The poles of a transfer function are :
• the values of the Laplace transform variabl
e, s, that cause the transfer function to bec
ome infinite or
• any roots of the denominator of the transfe
r function that are common to roots of the
numerator
2
1st order review
a
T (s)
( s a)
3
Type of Systems
• First-order Systems
• Second-order Systems
• Higher-order Systems
4
Second-order Systems
5
Nature of response for 2nd order systems
6
7
K1 K2
C (s) K1e p1t K 2 e p2t
Laplace
s p1 s p2
1t 2 t
c(t ) K1e K 2e Overdamped
d t
c(t ) Ae cos(d t ) Underdamped
are underdamped
13
For each of the following transfer functions,
write, by inspection, the general form of the step
response:
14
General form of Second-order Syst
ems
• Natural frequency (n )
• Damping ratio ( ) Undamped
Y ( s) n2 natural frequency
2 (rad/sec)
U ( s ) s 2 n s n2
15
.
s1, 2 n n 12
16
Natural Frequency
x j d j n 1 2
x j d
x j d j n 1 2
Imaginary component
is damped natural
frequency
n
x j d
Frequency at which system actually oscillates
18
Damping Ratio
ζ = x/ω
x j d j n 1 2
ω
Angle
1
1
tan cos 1
n x
x j d
19
20
Damping factor Effect
21
Example 4.4
underdamped
22
System Specifications
• Peak time, Tp: Time to reach maximum peak.
Tp
n 1 2 d
2
1
%OS e
100%
23
• Settling time Ts: Time required for oscillations to
be bounded within 2% of steady state value
4
Ts
n
Tp
These 3 are related to poles.
%OS=b/a × 100%
24
Line of Constant Decay Rate
Real part of pole gives
rate of decay x j d
25
Line of Constant Frequency
Imaginary
part of pole gives
oscillation frequency x j d
27
Same settling time
Same % overshoot
28
.
30
What are the poles?
• Real part: Tells the settling time, with the
closest source to the origin, with the most
settling time, the slowest response. We cal
l this pole dominant pole, which is the mos
t important pole. Most in the system
• Imaginary part: Shows the vibration of the
incoming signal, which means% overshoot
and peak time.
31
Effect of Zero’s Position
Zeros are very effective if they are near dominant poles (pole-zero
cancellation). For example, a system with poles at -1 ± j2.828, if added at
zero, will have the same result.
32
Example
Poles are -3±j7
Tp, Ts, %OS
Tp
d 7
4 4
Ts
d 3
%OS e ( 3 / 7 ) 100 26%
33
Type of Systems
• First-order Systems
• Second-order Systems
• Higher-order Systems
34
.
Higher-Order System
Second-order systems are based on dominant poles
Example 1 Overdamped
A K1 K2 K3
C (s)
s s p1 s p2 s p3
Au (t ) K1e p1t K 2 e p2t K 3e p3t
Laplace
Example 2 Underdamped
A B ( s n ) Cd D
C (s)
s ( s n ) d
2
s r
c(t ) Au (t ) e nt ( B cos d t C sin d t ) De r t
35
(∞)
= Case III
36
.
Nise’s Proposition
37
.
conclusions
• In this chapter, we will study the response
of the transient system only, focusing on 1
st and 2nd order systems
• The key terms are time constant, settling t
ime (4 times of time constant), dominant
pole, natural frequency, damping ratio (re
sulting in different response)
• How do poles and zeros affect system res
ponsiveness?
38
Multiple Subsystems and Reductio
n
Look at the
integrated
specification Split and draw system and write
system Block Diagram Schematics
Find transfer
write Block
Analyze theory function
Diagram
Of each block
39
Block Symbols
40
Cascade Connections
41
Parallel Connections
42
Feedback Loop
E ( s) R( s) C ( s) H ( s)
C ( s ) E ( s )G ( s )
C (s)
Replace E(s) with
G ( s)
C ( s) G(s)
R( s) 1 G ( s) H ( s)
43
Box-moving Technique
Move pass summing junction
44
Move pass pick-off point
45
Example
46
47
Example
48
49