0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views26 pages

Subscriber Data Integrity: Customer Management From A Solid Foundation: Telecom Business Intelligence Starts Here

This document discusses subscriber data integrity and analysis, which is the core of customer management in business intelligence solutions for telecommunications companies. It outlines traditional subscriber tracking metrics and their limitations, and advocates expanding metrics to better capture activations, churn, migrations, and customer-focused services. The document argues that applying business rules in data loading instead of at the source often leads to inaccuracies, complexity, and lack of trust in results. It critiques traditional reporting methodologies like counting billed customers or using snapshots, which can misrepresent the true state of subscribers.

Uploaded by

Sajal Ghosh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views26 pages

Subscriber Data Integrity: Customer Management From A Solid Foundation: Telecom Business Intelligence Starts Here

This document discusses subscriber data integrity and analysis, which is the core of customer management in business intelligence solutions for telecommunications companies. It outlines traditional subscriber tracking metrics and their limitations, and advocates expanding metrics to better capture activations, churn, migrations, and customer-focused services. The document argues that applying business rules in data loading instead of at the source often leads to inaccuracies, complexity, and lack of trust in results. It critiques traditional reporting methodologies like counting billed customers or using snapshots, which can misrepresent the true state of subscribers.

Uploaded by

Sajal Ghosh
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Subscriber Data Integrity

Customer Management from a Solid Foundation:


Telecom Business Intelligence Starts Here
Simon Marwood
President – Scorecard Systems Inc.
Toronto, Canada / London, UK / Galway, Ireland / Sao Paulo, Brazil
[email protected]
+1 416 580 2416 / +44 791 346 8120
Subscriber Data Integrity: BI starts here

 Why Subscriber/Product/Unit Analysis is the core to Customer


Management in your BI solution

 What are the traditional subscriber tracking metrics, and how should
they be expanded?

 What are the pitfalls with traditional subscriber tracking


methodologies?

 What is the successful approach many telecom operators have used


to drive higher data quality and richness through change data
capture / business rule methodologies within an EDW / Data Mart
environment

2
Subscriber Analysis

The Core to Customer Management in a BI Solution:


You have to get this right first.
Subscriber Analysis: The Foundation

 Business Intelligence For Telecoms Operators:


 “Effectively Transforming Telecoms Data Into Strategic Intelligence To Radically Improve Decision
Making, Enhance Operational Efficiencies And Create Competitive Advantage”.
 “The challenge as they move forward is to deliver increasingly more customer-focused revenue
generating services, while reducing OpEx”.

 What does this mean to many attendees of Telecom Data Warehousing


/ Business Intelligence conferences?
 CDR / xDR Analysis
 Monitor calling patterns to optimize network
 Predict churn based on dropped call records, decreases in outbound calls
 Predict churn based on churn from friends + family that were formerly with the carrier or its
landline/wireless affiliate
 Cost of Acquisition / Customer Profitability Analysis
 Retain profitable customers
 Reduce cost of acquisition in low margin channels
 Active Data Warehousing
 Feedback loop to CSRs to save customers
 Identification of upsell opportunities
 Revenue Assurance

 Traffic, traffic, traffic

4
Subscriber Analysis: The Foundation

 BUT:
 Most carriers do not accurately capture activations, churn, plan to plan
migrations, transfers between landline/wireless phones
 Most carriers do not accurately capture “customer-focused revenue generating
services” and the related activity in their subscriber base.
 Most executives STILL do not have one version of the truth.

 In many cases the result:


 Use of DW/BI tools is restricted to a core group of analysts or power users.
 Wide deployment to sales / marketing / finance is restricted due to a lack of
trust in the numbers.
 “Mission critical spreadsheets” continue to proliferate.
 Different business rules.
 Different data sources.
 Long turn-around time on change requests to IT due to hard-coded rules in DW
or BI tools.
 The good news is that the opportunity is there to deploy to a much
broader and deeper audience by solving this issue.

5
Subscriber Analysis: The Foundation

 In order to best empower:


 Traffic Analysis
 Cost of Acquisition / Profitability
 Active Data Warehousing
 Revenue Assurance

 You need to know:


 Was this really churn?
 Was this really a new acquisition?
 Was the new customer-focused revenue generating service:
 Initiated at the same time the customer activated?
 A first time upsell to the product?
 A reconnect of a product the customer had previously cancelled?
 Rate plan surfing?
 Bad news, because it is connected to a downgrade from a bundle or package?

6
Traditional Subscriber
Tracking Metrics
Subscriber Metrics: Fixed Line - Traditional

 Beginning Active Units


 Connects (Ins)
 Disconnects (Outs)
 Voluntary Disconnects (Outs)
 Involuntary Disconnects (Outs)
 Migrations (maybe – often a plug if the numbers don’t tie)
 Usually hard-coded SQL: If product A cancels and product B activates, then
count migration from A->B
 Net Connects
 Ending Active Units
 % Churn
 % Penetration

8
Subscriber Metrics: Mobile - Traditional

 Beginning Subscribers
 Activations
 Deactivations
 Voluntary Deactivations
 Involuntary Deactivations
 30 Day Deactivations / Negative Gross Activations
 Usually based on Deactivation Reason Code
 Reactivations (maybe – often based on a reason code)
 Migrations (maybe – often a plug if the numbers don’t tie)
 Net Activations
 Ending Subscribers
 % Churn

 Attempts are made to exclude telephone # changes, account swaps,


phantom churn, often based on reason codes and assumptions

9
Subscriber Metrics: MSO/DTTH - Traditional

 Beginning Units
 Connects
 New Connects (based on work order type)
 Reconnects (based on work order type)
 Restarts (based on work order type)
 Moves (based on work order type)
 Upgrades
o Billing System 1: If the bill today is one penny more than yesterday, EVERYTHING is an
upgrade
o Billing System 2: if it is a new service code on an existing client, it is an upgrade
 If customer connects Movie Channel 1 and disconnects Super Movie Bundle, Movie Channel 1 is counted
as an upgrade, even though customer profile is now much worse!

 Disconnects
 Voluntary Disconnects (based on work order type)
 Involuntary Disconnects (based on work order type)
 Moves (based on work order type)
 Downgrades
 Ending Units / RGUs / Customer Relationships
 % Churn / % Penetration

10
Subscriber Metrics - Expanded

 Activations / Connects  Net Pending Connects


 Gross Activations (+)
New Activations (+)  New Pending Connects
Port Activations (+)
 Negative Gross Activations (-)
 Pending Connects -> Active
 De-Re Activations (-)  Slippage
 Adds (+) Pre-Field Cancel
Field Cancel
 Reactivations
 Reconnects (Voluntary/Involuntary) (+)
 Restarts (Voluntary/Involuntary) (+)  Net Pending Disconnects
 Re-adds (Voluntary/Involuntary) (+)  New Pending Disconnects
 Port Reactivations (+)
 Pending Disconnects -> Active
 Deactivations  Pending Disconnects -> Disconnects
 Full Deactivations (+)
 Port Deactivations (+)
 De-Re Deactivations (-)  Homes Passed
 Drops (+)  Active Homes Passed
 Formerly Active Homes Passed
 Suspends  Never Active Homes Passed
 Seasonal / Voluntary Suspends
 Involuntary Suspends
 Customer Relationships / RGUs
 Migrations
 Upgrades/Downgrades/Sidegrades  % Churn / % Penetration
 U/D/S To
 U/D/S From

11
Traditional Subscriber
Reporting Methodologies
(and why they are bad)
Basics: Where To Put Your Business Rules

 Many (not all) BI Tool Salespeople:


 Just apply some rules in the data load into our BI tool!
 Works very well if you are selling cheese or suits.
 Telecom world – not so straightforward
 Trust Issue:
 System Shows 135 DSL Connections.
 Sales Person Has 150 DSL Connection Forms.
 Does Not Know that 10 are still Pending Connections, 5 were caught as De-Re.
 If Business Rules applied in OLAP / Q&R tool, now need to re-write same rules
in detail queries – replicating business rules in many different places.
 Complexity Issue:
 Telecom Carriers are no longer the water company.

13
Method 1: Count Billed Customers

 If we sent a bill, they must be a customer,


or the service must be active:
1. If customer/product activated on the 31st of
WRONG!
the month and was not billed: not counted
2. If customer/product was billed on the 10th of
the month and cancelled on the 12th: is WRONG!
counted
3. Prepaid environment: no bills WRONG!

14
Method 2: Snapshots

 Extract snapshot table from Billing System / Data Warehouse


 Drive Customer/Product Activity from dates.

Customer ID Activation Date Deactivation Date Product Code

2503812 March 1st,


January 1, 2007
3, 2007 February 28th, 2007 114
111
 January 1st: Activation on Product 111
 January 3rd:
 Customer Changes to Product 114
 Now appears the Customer Activated on 114
 Marketing would want to show this as a migration from 111 to 114
 February 28th: Deactivation on Product 114
 March 1st: Reactivation on Product 114
 In the Billing System, Deactivation Date turns blank
 Reporting System “trusts” the snapshot
 Activation on March 1st
 In many cases – history vanishes – January and February numbers change

15
Method 3: Add Up The Service Orders

 This method is used by the majority of telecom carriers

 Add up: New Connect, In, To, Activate, Change Orders


 Count As New Connects
 Add up: Disconnect, Out, From, Cancel, Change Orders
 Count As Disconnects
 Net Connects = New Connects – Disconnects
 Ending Units/Subscribers = Beginning Units/Subscribers + Net Connects

 Overstates Churn AND Activations

 Move from 10 Main Street to 55 Queen Street


 Handset Migration not done properly by CSR
 Bulk Updates to Billing System = No Service Orders!
 “TRUST THE BILLING SYSTEM”
 After all, the Billing System is an outstanding BI Tool, which is why we’re all here

16
Method 3a: Service Orders + Manual Entry

 Many carriers realized that trusting the billing system was not a good idea:
 Needed more accuracy
 Needed more richness
 What else was available?
 Manually entered disconnect/connect reason codes
 Manually entered work order types
 After all:
 CSRs are all extremely well trained.
 Dealers/Sales People never try to cheat and code transactions as sales to earn extra commissions
 CSRs/Dealers are outstanding BI Tools, which is why we’re all here 

 Disconnects within 30 days based on Reason Code: Buyer’s Remorse /


Activation In Error
 50% of the time, these codes were being used 1-10 years later. CSRs were cheating the system.
 Commission paid to Residential Reps who upsell to a Voice Mail package
 Two codes in the billing system for Voice Mail package.
 Every 61 days, reps would flip-flop the package
 Overpaid commissions by 15%

17
Subscriber Activity: What We Have Seen

 Majority of carriers:
 Sales reports 35,000 new activations
 Marketing reports 34,900 new activations
 Finance reports 29,000 new activations, accuses Sales and Marketing of
cheating for extra commissions

 Some carriers:
 Top-line numbers are the same (“One Version Of The Truth”), but:
 Upon drilling down to tariff, rate plan, sales person, geography, customer segment,
tenure, numbers again do not tie out; or
 Business rules use method 1-3, and are therefore not as accurate/rich as they should
be.

 And a few carriers:


 Use more accurate methods for business rules, but:
 Business rules, product matching algorithms for upgrades/downgrades are hard-
coded
 Audit/Balancing trail to billing system hard to follow

18
Subscriber Activity: Getting It
Right
(as Telecom BI starts here)
Subscriber Activity: Getting It Right

1. Get rid of all business rules that are not stored relationally.
 You need to be able to drill back to the customer detail.
 You need to be able to provide an audit trail back to the source systems.
 You need to be able to use all of the BI tools that your company has suggested with
the business rules stored in one central location.
2. Trust nobody.
 Do not trust CSRs, Dealers and Sales People.
 Do not trust the Billing / Service Order System.
 Do not trust Analysts writing their own business rules.
 Do not trust Vendors who want to write business rules from scratch.
3. Get rid of all hard coded business rules.
 Do not hard code definitions for activations, churn, de-re, etc.
 Do not hard code links between “like” products for upgrade/downgrade analysis.
4. Always provide an audit trail.
 How did we get from one subscriber state to another?
 Do we tie back to the ending counts in the billing system?
 Do we tie back to our company’s official business rules?

20
Subscriber Activity: Carrier Success

Billing System(s) [original source of unit data]

Daily/Monthly subscriber
change/snapshot records

Canned
Reports
Data Warehouse/Data Marts
All Business Rules Customer Lists
Subscriber Profile Revenue/Usage
applied relationally
at subscriber/service Daily Activity Subscriber Cost
level using table Commissions
Customer Contact Subscriber Profitability
based approach Welcome
Letters

Revenue /
Subscriber Revenue
Usage
Activity Plan /
Actuals
Forecast
Data Mining
Actual/plan information
shared between cubes

Relational Queries EIS/Dashboards Excel Templates

21
Subscriber Activity: Carrier Success

Source Systems

Methodology
1. Change Data Capture: End of
Product Map State Subscriber Table Day State Today – End of Day
State Yesterday
Product Family Rank
2. Generates:
A 1 5 Houses Customer Snapshot On All Change
Dates • Customers In/Out
B 1 10
(Not One Record Every Day = Huge) • Products/Plans In/Out for
C 1 1 Existing Customers
D 2 3 • Attribute Changes (Credit
Score, Modem ESN,
OK Customer Segment, etc.)
3. Apply Customer
Matching/Phantom Churn Rules
to link together Customers the
Business Rules Table Daily Activity Table Billing System thinks are
separate
Status: A True Customer Transactions Based on
4. Business Rules defined cross-
Carrier’s Business Rules:
Previous Status: C departmentally are also table
Not the way the Billing System forces based
Period: < 30 Days CSR to enter it as it only has three work
5. Product Map/Catalog links
Metric: Reactivation order types.
together disconnects/connects of
Not the way the sneaky Sales Person like products and turns them into
OK coded it to try to get an extra commission upgrades/downgrades
6. Weekly/Monthly Trueup ensures
ending counts = source system
7. Automatic Balancing ensures
22 Beginning + Net Activity = Ending
Subscriber Activity: Customer Success

 Ability to leverage best practices for subscriber analysis from other telecommunications
carriers.

 Deployment of solution that will allow for table-based business rule changes rather than
requiring IT intervention/coding

 Implement a superior approach to subscriber activity reporting by eliminating “adding up


service order” approach

 Obtaining deeper insight into subscriber activity (i.e., if 500 new instances of High Speed
Data were added yesterday):
 How many HSD instances were added due to new subscriber connects?
 How many HSD instances were added as part of a reconnect?
 How many HSD instances were added to existing subscribers that formerly had HSD?
 How many HSD instances were added to existing subscribers for the first time?
 How many HSD instances were added due to a downgrade in service from a internet bundle?

23
Subscriber Activity: Customer Success

 Ability to answer questions such as:


 How many access line disconnects were part of an upgrade to DSL?
 How many customers took advantage of a promotion to activate a new product code, but were simply
sidegrades from an existing product (cannibalization) ?
 How many customers “surf” promotions (connect/disconnect the same product each time a promotional
campaign starts/finishes) ?
 How many customers have a particular product on a la carte basis, either full price, or at a 15% or 25%
discount? How many have the same product in a bundle?

 Providing audit trail for tracking back reported statistics to source data
 In the event of an audit, or executive questioning the reported numbers, the system will allow users to “track
back” the reported numbers through the business rules to the source billing system data.

 Enhancing EDW’s power in providing the single source “one version of the truth” for
subscriber activity metrics, removing business rules and inconsistencies from
dashboards, reporting/query tools, reports, etc.

24
Subscriber Activity: Customer Success

 5 million subscriber wireless carrier identified $2.1 million/year in overpaid commissions


due to De-Re process not caught by previous reporting process.

 1 million access line fixed line carrier reduced commissions in residential call center by
15% due to Feature Spins (In/Out on similar products) not caught by previous reporting
process.

 1 million subscriber wireless carrier reduced involuntary churn by identifying credit


classes with extremely high non-payment frequency and reps activating low credit
customers. Reduced bad debt write-off by $1.1 million/year, commission payments by
$250,000/year. Customers with identified credit profiles now offered prepaid service
only.

 250,000 subscriber wireless carrier identified commission overpayments of


$600,000/year, which were eliminated.

 1 million subscriber wireless carrier eliminated redundant reports produced by billing


company. Cost savings of $350,000/year

25
Thank You For Your Attention!

Simon Marwood
President – Scorecard Systems Inc.
Toronto, Canada / London, UK / Galway, Ireland / Sao Paulo, Brazil
[email protected]
+1 416 580 2416 / +44 791 346 8120

You might also like