Justine
Justine
INSTITUTE OF
PHILIPPINE
CULTURE’S STUDY ON
PHILIPPINE VALUES
• Sikolohiyang Pilipino beginning in the 1970’s, there have been
researchers on Philippine values which were initiated by the
Institute of Philippine Culture (IPC) of the Ateneo de Manila in the
1960’s.
• According to social psychologist Allen Tan (2008), this was a time
when modernization theory was popular in the social sciences, and
if the IPC’s researchers were to be examined, it is evident that the
underlying theme is modernization and economic development, with
hope that by understanding the Filipino psyche they will discover
the key to economic development.
• However, most of these researchers were trained abroad
and utilized foreign theories no study Philippine culture.
Because of this trend, they were criticized by other
scholars, most of whom have nationalist orientation.
THE INSTITUTE OF PHILIPPINE
CULTURE
Philippine culture is an Ateneo de Manila based organization that
carries out studies on local problems pertaining to education and
economic development, and by so doing aims to promote a better
way of understanding the Filipino way of life.
It utilizes an interdisciplinary method in doing and analyzing studies
with the belief that the joint endeavors of the arts and sciences will
help us understand Filipino identity better.
The Institute believes there are mutual and archetypal ways of
thinking, doing, valuing, and feeling that are uniquely Filipino.
It’s goal is to make a lifelong impact to the study of Philippine
culture.
The Institute of Philippine Culture Papers serve as the venue
for the dissemination of the Institute’s research findings.
(Lynch, 1968).
FOUR PHILIPPINE VALUES
In the IPC Papers No.2 entitled Four Readings on
Philippine Values (Lynch,1968), four Philippine values were
discussed which provide insight into Philippine culture:
social acceptance by Frank Lynch; reciprocity in the
lowland Philippines by Mary Hollnsteiner; The Manileno’s
mainsprings by Jaime Bulatao; and Filipino
entrepreneurship in manufacturing by John Carroll.
SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE
• The American Jesuit anthropologist Franck Lynch noted that Filipinos value social
acceptance , which is manifested when one is not rejected or criticized by others
(Lynch,1968). It also means being taken by one’s fellows for what a person is, and
is treated based on his or her social status.
• Filipino also value smooth interpersonal relations (SIR) which he contrasted with
the American way of being “brutally frank”.
• He defined SIR as an ability at coping with others through avoidance of outward
signs of conflict.
• SIR can be achieved through the following means: pakikisama,euphemism, and
the use of a go-between.
• He defined pakikisama as conceding, or yielding to the will of another.
• Another way of achieving smooth interpersonal is through the use of
euphemism, or stating of disagreeable truth, opinion, or request as nicely as
possible.
• The use of go-between is another way to achieve smooth interpersonal
relations. It means having a middle-person to mediate between two parties
for an uncomfortable request, complaint, or decision, which is often to evade
the indignity of a personal encounter.
• Lynch also discussed the concept of hiya as a general social agreement in
lowland Philippine society which enforces compliance with all facets of the
social rules; and amor propio, or self- esteem, which he described as a
reaction against harsh interpersonal conflict.
RECIPROCITY
• The half-American “activist social scientist” Mary Hollnsteiner (now Dr.
Mary Racelis) studied reciprocity, which she defined as that code of
conduct wherein for every service accepted, intentionally sought for or
not, there should be a return.
She proposed three types of reciprocity:
1. Contractual Reciprocity
2. Quasi – Contractual Reciprocity
3. Utang na Loob (debt of gratitude)
CONTRACTUAL RECIPROCITY