Investing in Competitive Methods: By: Fiona Caramba-Coker For: Dr. Fred Demicco
Investing in Competitive Methods: By: Fiona Caramba-Coker For: Dr. Fred Demicco
Competitive Methods
Chapter 7
3. relate the estimation of cash flows, cost of capital, risk, and investment
to the responsibility of adding value.
4. relate the use of the net present value (NPV) discounted cash flow
technique to the adding value imperative of all managers.
Competitive Methods
P1 S1
P2 S2
P3 S3
The Role of the Manager in Adding Value
to the Firm
Assets and
Capital S1 Service
Training
Revenue
Maximization Resource
Strategic Allocation
Alliances
The Reality
Cash Flows, Cost of Capital, Risk, and
Investment and Their Responsibility to
Adding Value
• When making an investment decision, there are
four factors that a manager must first consider.
al
a pi t
ws
k
of c
t
lo
men
g ris
sh f
t
cos
st
inin
g ca
nve
g
rm
in
inin
i
Dete
The
mat
erm
Esti
Det
Cash Flows
n
CFt
NPV I Investment
t 1 1 k
t
Cost of Capital
Length of Project
What Now???
A. Cash flows
B. Capital
C. Balance sheet
D. Assets
True
False
Investors can avoid unnecessary risk by making the right investments based upon their
effective environmental scanning.
True
False
True
False
True
False
Short Answer Response
What are the pillars of the investment decision in competitive methods?
What are two primary discounted cash flow (DCF) techniques employed by
analysts?
According to the information below, try to answer the questions: The cost of
debt is 2 percent.
The cost of equity is 10 percent.
The total of long-term liabilities and stockholder's equity is $600,000.
The total amount of the long-term liabilities is $300,000.
The total amount of the stockholder's equity is $100,000.
1. Pedagogical value: In its coverage of CRM-customer relationship management, does the case satisfactorily address
learning objectives that are important in a marketing management course? Why or why not?
2. Quality of presentation: Does the depiction of Hilton's organization and executive leadership strike you as balanced and
objective? If not, why not? Is the case story interesting and fluently told? Was it engaging to you? What more, if
anything, should the authors do to inject energy or drama into the case?
4. Exhibits: This case has an unusually large number of exhibits for an HBSP Brief Case. Are they all valuable? Can you
recommend one or two that might, in the interest of brevity, be eliminated without damaging the pedagogical
purpose?
5. Quantitative aspect: Please evaluate carefully the quantitative challenge that the case presents to you. Will good
students correctly perceive the quantitative analysis and interpretation that is expected of them? Should the
assignment be made more or less explicit in the case? Is the quantitative assignment pegged at roughly the right
level for your good students? Please review the TN's discussion of the quantitative aspect of the case: simply put, is
the math correct? Is the analysis appropriate and intellectually sound?
6. Breadth and depth: Is the case sufficiently broad in focus and deep in detail to support a full-class discussion in your
course? Conversely, is the case too ambitious in scope and complexity for a single session of homework plus class
discussion? If the latter, what topics should be dropped or trimmed back?
7. Which statement below best reflects the case's readiness for publication?
◦ A first-rate case: Ready for publishing with virtually no changes.
◦ A good case nearly ready for publication, but needs minor refinements or improvements.
◦ A good case, but needs major refinements or improvements before ready for publication.
◦ I doubt this case is worthy of publication even if further work is invested.
Supplemental Readings