Module 3 The International Monetary System
Module 3 The International Monetary System
LO 2
LO 1
Explain the role played by the
Describe the historical
World Bank and the IMF in
development of the modern
the international monetary
global monetary system.
system.
LO 4
LO 3
Objectives
and a floating exchange rate
adopt different exchange rate
system.
regimes.
LO 5
LO 6
Understand the debate
Explain the implications of
surrounding the role of the
the global monetary system
IMF in the management of
for management practice.
financial crises.
Introduction
The international monetary system is the institutional arrangement that govern exchange
rates
• Recall that the foreign exchange market is the primary institution for determining exchange rates
A floating exchange rate system exists where the foreign exchange market determines the
relative value of a currency
A pegged exchange rate system exists when the value of a currency is fixed to a reference
country and then the exchange rate between that currency and other currencies is
determined by the reference currency exchange rate
A managed float or dirty float exists when the
value of a currency is determined by market
forces, but with central bank intervention if it
depreciates too rapidly against an important
reference currency
The Gold
Standard To facilitate trade, a system was developed so
that payment could be made in paper
currency that could then be converted to gold
at a fixed rate of exchange
Mechanics of the Gold Standard
The gold standard worked fairly well from the 1870s until the start of World War I
After the war countries started regularly devaluing their currencies to try to encourage
exports
Confidence in the system fell, and people began to demand gold for their currency
putting pressure on countries' gold reserves, and forcing them to suspend gold
convertibility
Under the
Bretton Woods Devaluations were not to be used for
competitive purposes
Agreement
IMF Flexibility
Does the World institution of the United Nations that would provide loans to
developing countries for capital investments in the country. Broadly,
the World Bank’s official goal is the reduction of poverty in the
Bank Make global marketplace. According to its Articles of Agreement, all of the
World Bank’s decisions must be guided by a commitment to the
Global Markets promotion of foreign investment and international trade and to the
facilitation of capital investment. These goals are admirable to most
Less people and countries, but what effect does lending to developing
countries have on the rest of the world? Would it be better or worse
Competitive?
if lending was only based on risk assessments and financial
opportunities of countries in a free market system?
The collapse of the Bretton Woods system can be
traced to U.S. macroeconomic policy decisions
(1965 to 1968)
The Floating
jumped between 1977 and 1978
The oil crisis of 1979
The unexpected rise in the dollar between 1980 and 1985
Exchange Rate Rapid fall of dollar against Japanese yen and German
deutsche mark
Fixed Versus
regime
Under the Bretton Woods system (fixed system), IMF
Is the
financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high
employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty
around the world. It is a specialized agency of the United Nations
but has its own charter, governing structure, and finances. Its
members are represented through a quota system broadly based on International
Monetary
their relative size in the global economy. The Board of Governors,
the highest decision-making body of the IMF, consists of one
governor and one alternate governor for each member country. The
governor is appointed by the member country and is usually the
minister of finance or the governor of the central bank. Fund
Should the IMF’s one-size fits-all approach (see the section on "
Inappropriate Policies" in this chapter) be evaluated? If yes,
how would you change it? If no, why not?
Needed?
Source: http://www.imf.org
Evaluating the IMF’s Policy Prescriptions
In 2016, 30 countries were working IMF
programs
All IMF loan packages come with
conditions attached, generally a
combination of tight macroeconomic policy
Crisis
and tight monetary policy Management
Many experts have criticized these policy by the IMF
prescriptions
Inappropriate policies
Moral hazard
Lack of accountability
Evaluating the IMF’s Policy Prescriptions continued
Inappropriate Policies
The IMF has been criticized for having a
“one-size-fits-all” approach to
macroeconomic policy that is
inappropriate for many countries
Moral Hazard Crisis
The IMF has also been criticized for
exacerbating moral hazard: people
Management
behave recklessly because they know they
will be saved if things go wrong
by the IMF
Lack of Accountability
The IMF has become too powerful for an
institution that lacks any real mechanism
for accountability
Focus on Managerial Implications