Assessment of Learning Module 4.2 1
Assessment of Learning Module 4.2 1
OF
ASSESSMENT
METHODS
Assessment methods can be
classified as traditional and
authentic. Traditional assessment
method refers to the usual paper-
and-pencil test while authentic
assessment refers to non-paper-and-
pencil test. Authentic assessment is
also called alternative
The paper-and-pencil test
(traditional assessment)
assesses learning in the
cognitive domain (Bloom) or
declarative knowledge (Kendall
& Marzano, 2012).
The paper-and-pencil test,
however, is inadequate to
measure all forms of learning.
Psychomotor learning (Kendall
and Marzano, 2012) and
learning proven by a product
and by a performance cannot
be measured by a paper-and-
pencil test.
McMillan (2007) identified four
major categories: selected-
response, constructed-response,
teacher observation and student
self-assessment. These are similar
to carpenter tools and you need to
choose which is apt for a given task.
It is not wise to stick to one method
of assessment.
1. Selected-response Format
Teacherobservations
Teacher observationsare area aform
formofofon-
on-
goingassessment,
going assessment,usually
usuallydone
doneinin
combinationwith
combination withoral
oralquestioning.
questioning.
Teachersregularly
Teachers regularlyobserve
observestudents
studentstoto
check on their understanding.
check on their understanding. By By
watchinghow
watching howstudents
studentsrespond
respondtotooral
oral
questionsand
questions andbehave
behaveduring
duringindividual
individual
andcollaborative
and collaborativeactivities,
activities,the
theteacher
teacher
canget
can getinformation
informationif iflearning
learningisistaking
taking
placeininthe
place theclassroom.
classroom.
Non-verbalcues
Non-verbal cuescommunicate
communicatehow how
learnersare
learners aredoing.
doing.Teachers
Teachershave have
totobebewatchful
watchfulif ifstudents
studentsare arelosing
losing
attention,misbehaving,
attention, misbehaving,ororappearappear
non-participativeininclassroom
non-participative classroom
activities.ItItwould
activities. wouldbebebeneficial
beneficialif if
teachersmake
teachers makeobservational
observationaloror
anecdotalnotes
anecdotal notestotodescribe
describehow how
students learn in terms
students learn in terms of conceptof concept
building,problem
building, problemsolving,
solving,
communicationskills,
communication skills,etc.
etc.
4. Student Self-Assessment
Self-Assessment is a process
where the students are given a
chance to reflect and rate
their own work and judge how
well they have performed in
relation to a set of assessment
criteria. Students track and
evaluate their own progress or
performance.
Studies show that self-assessment
exercises provide students with an
opportunity to reflect on their
performance, monitor their learning
progress, motivate them to do well
and give feedback to the teacher
which the latter can use to improve
the subject/course. It is an essential
component of formative assessment
(Black & Wiliam, 1998).
Constructive Alignment
The principle of constructive alignment simply
means that the teaching-learning activity or
activities and assessment tasks are aligned to
the intended learning outcome. The intended
learning outcomes is “to drive a car”. The
teaching-learning activity is driving a car not
giving lectures on car driving.. The assessment
task is to let the student drive a car not to
describe how to drive a car.
You have been victims of teachers who taught you
one thing but assessed you on another. The
result? Much confusion and disappointment? If
you have been victims of lack of constructive
alignment, then break the cycle by not victimizing
your students, too. Observe the principle of
constructive alignment. Make sure your
assessment tasks are aligned to your learning
outcomes.
Why the term “constructive”?
Constructive alignment is
based on the constructivist
theory (Biggs, 2007) that
learners use their own activity
to construct their knowledge or
other outcome/s.
Constructive alignment provides the “how-
to” by verifying that the teaching-learning
activities (TLAs) and the assessment tasks
(Ats) activate the same verbs as in the ILOs.
Hence, it is vital that the teacher considers
the domain of learning and the level of
thinking he/she would like to measure. The
performance verbs in the ILOs are indicators
of the methods of assessment suitable to
measure and evaluate students learning.
McMillan (2007) prepared a
scoreboard as a guide on how well
a particular assessment method
measures each level of learning.
The table below depicts the
relative strength of each
assessment method in measuring
different learning targets.
Learning Targets and Assessment Methods (McMillan, 2007)
Assessment Methods
Selected- Essay Performance Oral Observatio Student Self
response Tasks Questioning n Assessment
and Brief
constructed
response
Targets 5 4 3 4 3 3
Knowledge
and Simple
Understanding
Deep 2 5 4 4 2 3
Understanding
and
Reasoning
Skills 1 3 5 2 5 3
Products 1 1 5 2 4 4
Affect 1 2 4 4 4 5