The theory of contestable markets was developed by William Baumol in 1982 to explain why some monopoly or oligopoly markets may operate competitively. The key points are that the threat of potential competition, rather than actual competition, can force firms to price close to costs. For a market to be truly contestable, there must be no barriers to entry or exit such as sunk costs.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views
Contestable Markets
The theory of contestable markets was developed by William Baumol in 1982 to explain why some monopoly or oligopoly markets may operate competitively. The key points are that the threat of potential competition, rather than actual competition, can force firms to price close to costs. For a market to be truly contestable, there must be no barriers to entry or exit such as sunk costs.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
Contestable Markets
The theory was developed by William J.
Baumol in 1982 to explain why in some monopoly or oligopolistic markets, firms may operate in a competitive manner which will enable consumers to obtain the benefits of economies of scale and lower prices as well as reducing welfare losses associated with markets dominated by a few firms. The equilibrium position for a firm in a contestable market will be closer to that………. Contestable Markets …predicted by perfect competition than monopoly or oligopoly. In the theory of contestable markets, it is not the number of firms in the industry, the actual level of competition, which is important in determining the behavior of firms within it, but the threat of potential competition from new firms possibly entering that industry. Contestable Markets If an incumbent firm in a monopoly or oligopoly market believes that by fixing high prices and earning supernormal profits there is the possibility that this will attract new firms into the industry who might take over the market, then it might set prices equal to or relatively close to average costs to prevent this from happening. This strategy of setting a price below that which will maximize a firm’s profits in order to deter….. Contestable Markets …new entrants into the market, is known as Limit Pricing. In order for it to be successful it is necessary for the incumbent firm to have an accurate knowledge of the cost structure of potential entrants. This will enable it to set a price below the minimum average costs of potential new entrants, which would mean that they would be… Contestable Markets …unable to set a price which would enable them to make a profit. Limit pricing may also have the advantage of making it less likely that a monopoly firm would attract the attention of a country’s regulator. Clearly the extent to which a market is contestable will depend upon how easy it is for new firms to enter the industry and so an… Contestable Markets Absence of barriers to entry or low barriers to entry are crucial in determining this. It is also important for any prospective new entrant that the product is standardized and that they have access to the same technology as established firms. There must be no collusion between existing firms. Contestable Markets However, it is not only the case of entering the market that is important. Any prospective new entrant needs to plan for the eventuality that its attempt to enter a particular market may fail and that it will be forced out of the industry by the existing firms. The costs for the firm if it has to exit the market, therefore, need to be considered. Sunk costs are those costs which cannot be…. Contestable Markets …recovered if a firm goes out of business and may act as a barrier to entry. If entering the market involves the purchase of expensive capital equipment which could not be diverted to other uses or sold if the firm goes bankrupt, then this expenditure represents a sunk cost. If the risk of potential sunk costs is perceived by the firm as great this is likely to deter it…. Contestable Markets …from entering the market. Hence the lower the perceived risk of high sunk costs the more contestable the market is likely to be. A characteristic of contestable markets is “hit and run” competition. If an incumbent firm in the industry raises its price significantly above AC in order to increase profits to earn supernormal profits,… Contestable Markets … the absence of barriers to entry will attract new firms into the industry who will remain, offering lower prices as long as there are profits to be made. When the incumbent firm reduces its price the new entrants leave. In order to avoid the possibility of hit and run competition the existing firm in the industry will have to keep prices close to AC. Contestable Markets It is important to remember that it is the threat of competition not the actual competition that forces firms to be productively and allocatively efficient. Contestable markets theory has been used by some governments as an argument for reducing regulatory and legal barriers to entry to some industries in order to increase competition. The extent to which contestable markets can be… Contestable Markets …applied to the real world is questioned by some economists. It is unlikely that a market will be free from sunk costs. Any new firm entering a market is likely to have to undertake expensive advertizing and promotion costs at the outset which will be irretrievable. It is also likely that there will be some barriers to entry, either innocent in the form of economies…. Contestable Markets …of scale for existing firms, or ones deliberately created by incumbents such as mergers and takeovers, limit and predatory pricing. Limit pricing is a strategy adopted by a monopoly or oligopoly of setting prices below that which will maximize profits in order to deter new entrants. Predatory pricing is another strategy adopted by a monopoly or oligopoly of setting extremely low prices, often below average costs of production,… Contestable Markets …in order to force competitors out of the market and enable a firm to exploit increased monopoly power in the market by raising prices in the future.