Scribd
Upload
1K views

SBM Computation Sample

This document provides a scoring matrix and sample computation for assessing a school's level of school-based management. It includes two areas: (1) Improvement of learning outcomes which accounts for 60% and measures access, efficiency, and quality, (2) Validated practices using the Department Order which accounts for 40% and measures leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management. A sample school receives a rating of 2.62 for improvement of outcomes and 2.22 for validated practices. The overall rating across both areas is 2.25, indicating the school's level of practice is "maturing".

Uploaded by

Richard Canas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views

SBM Computation Sample

This document provides a scoring matrix and sample computation for assessing a school's level of school-based management. It includes two areas: (1) Improvement of learning outcomes which accounts for 60% and measures access, efficiency, and quality, (2) Validated practices using the Department Order which accounts for 40% and measures leadership, curriculum, accountability, and resource management. A sample school receives a rating of 2.62 for improvement of outcomes and 2.22 for validated practices. The overall rating across both areas is 2.25, indicating the school's level of practice is "maturing".

Uploaded by

Richard Canas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

SCHOOL BASED MANAGEMENT

SCORING MATRIX AND


SAMPLE COMPUTATION
LEGAL BASES
DepEd Order No. 63, s. 2012 known as the
Implementing Guidelines and in Revised School
Based Management (SBM) Assessment Process
and Tool (APAT)
Regional Memo No. 67, s. 2019 Implementing
Guidelines and in Revised School Based
Management (SBM) Assessment Process and Tool
(APAT)
Division Memorandum No. 030, s. 2021, Conduct
of School Based Management (SBM) Division
Level Validation of Qualified Schools in SDO
Camarines Sur
If we want something
done, measure it.
If we can’t measure it, we
can’t
achieve it.
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES (60%)

A. ACCESS (45%)
School Year Enrollment % of increase Rating and
(A-B)/B (100) equivalent points
2016-2017 400 Baseline 1- Marginal at
2017-2018 500 100/400 (100) = 25% least 1 % increase
2- Average at least
2018-2019 550 50/500 (100) = 10% 2 % increase
2019-2020 600 50/550 (100) = 9 % 3- High at least 10
% increase
Average % of increase 25+10+9/3 = 14.6% High = 3
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES (60%)
B. EFFECIENCY (25%)
% of decrease Rating and
School Year Drop Out Rate
Baseline-AD/B (100) equivalent points
2017-2018 2% 7.06-2.4 = 4.66 1- Marginal at
2018-2019 2.4 least 25 %
4.66/7.06 (100) decrease
2019-2020 2.81 66% 2- Average at least
50 % decrease
3- High – has 0%
DR
Average % of decrease 2+2.4+2.81/3 = 2.4 2
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES (60%)

School Year Completion % of increase Rating and


Rate (A-B)/B (100) equivalent points
(Baseline -75%) 1- Marginal at
2017-2018 85% 10/75 (100) = 13.33 least 5 % increase
2018-2019 79% 4/75 (100) = 5.33 2- Average at least
7 % increase
2019-2020 96% 21/75 (100) = 28 3- High at least 10
% increase
Average % of increase 13.33+5.33+20/3 = 15.55 3
%
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES (60%)

School Cohort % of increase Rating and


Year Survival Rate (A-B)/B (100) equivalent points
(Baseline -75%) 1- Marginal at
2017-2018 88% 13/75 (100) = 17.33 least 5 % increase
2018-2019 83% 8/75 (100) = 10.67 2- Average at least
7 % increase
2019-2020 96% 21/75 (100) = 28 3- High at least 10
% increase
Average % of increase 17.33+10.67+28/3 = 18.67% 3

Average Efficiency Rating DR+CR+CSR/3= 2+3+3=8/3 =


2.67
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING
OUTCOMES (60%)
C. QUALITY (30%)
School Average Final Average Rating and
Year Rating (SY1+SY2+SY3)/3 equivalent points
1- Marginal: 65-
2017-2018 86.8% 75%
2018-2019 85.6% 86.8+85.6+84.1=256/3=85.5 2- Average: 76-
85%
2019-2020 84.1% 3- High: 86-100%
Average 85.5% 2
Improvement of Learning Outcome

Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weighted Rating


Weight
ACCESS 45% 3x0.45 1.35
EFFECIENCY 25% 2.67x0.25 0.67
QUALITY 30% 2x0.30 0.6
TOTAL 100% 2.62
II. Validated Practices Using DOD
(40%)

SBM Principles Weight


Leadership and Governance 30%
Curriculum and Instruction 30%
Accountability and 25%
Continuous Improvement
Management of Resources 15%
Number of Indicators per principle

Number of
SBM Principles
Indicators
Leadership and Governance 5
Curriculum and Instruction 7
Accountability and
5
Continuous Improvement
Management of Resources 5
Leadership and Governance
Level 1 / or x Rating Level 2 / or x Rating Level 3 / or x Rating
Indicator 1

1 / 1 6 / 0 10 x 0
2 / 7 X
3 / 8 /
4 / 9 /
5 /
Leadership and Governance
Level 1
/ or x Rating Level 2 / or x Rating Level 3 / or x Rating
Indicator 2

1 / 6 / 2 7 x 0
2 /
3 /
4 /
5 /
Leadership and Governance
Level 1
/ or x Rating Level 2 / or x Rating Level 3 / or x Rating
Indicator 3

1 / 3 / 2 4 x 0
2 / 5 x
Leadership and Governance
Level 1
/ or x Rating Level 2 / or x Rating Level 3 / or x Rating
Indicator 4

1 / 1 4 / 0 6 x 0
2 / 5 x 7 x
3 /
Leadership and Governance
Level 1
/ or x Rating Level 2 / or x Rating Level 3 / or x Rating
Indicator 5

1 / 1 6 / 0 8 x 0
2 / 7 x
3 /
4 /
5 /
SUMMARY LEADERSHIP AND
GOVERNANCE (30%)

INDICATOR 1 1
INDICATOR 2 2
INDICATOR 3 2
INDICATOR 4 1
INDICATOR 5 1
TOTAL POINTS 7
AVERAGE 1.4
1.4x.30 0.42
Compute for Validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)
SBM Principles Weight Cumulative Scores of Results
Validators per Principle
Computation
Leadership and Governance 30% 1.4 x 0.30 0.42
Curriculum and Instruction 30% 2.50 x 0.30 0.75
Accountability and CI 25% 3.00 x 0.25 0.75
Management of Resources 15% 2.00 x 0.15 0.30
Sub-Total 100% 2.22
Interpretation Better

LEGEND: Numerical Rating Scale Description


0.50-1.49 Good
1.50-2.49 Better
2.50-3.00 Best
Final Rating
Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance
Improvement 60% 2.62x.60 1.36
B. SBM
Assessment
Score DOD
40% 2.22x.40 0.89
TOTAL
100% 2.25
SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE MATURING

NUMERICAL RATING DESCRIPTION


0.50-1.49 Developing
1.50-2.49 Maturing
2.50-3.0 Advanced
Don’t lower our
expectations to meet our
performance. Raise our
level of performance to
meet our expectations.
-Ralph Marston

You might also like