Chapter 2 Time Value of Money
Chapter 2 Time Value of Money
5-1
Outline
3-2
Time Value of Money Rationale
3-3
Time Lines
0 1 2 3
I%
5-4
Drawing Timelines
100
5-5
Drawing Timelines
0 1 2 3
I%
-50 100 75 50
5-6
Future Value
Future Value
This term refers to the value of a cash flow (or series
of them) at some specific future time. Any cash flow
that is scheduled to occur sometime later than today is
referred to as a “future value.”
In other words, future value means “what will it be
worth at some future point in time?” For example, if an
investment promises to pay $100 one year from now,
then the $100 is the future value of the investment
because that investment will be worth $100 at that
point in time.
3-7
What is the future value (FV) of an initial $100
after 3 years, if I/YR = 10%?
0 1 2 3
5%
100 FV = ?
5-8
Solving for FV:
The Step-by-Step and Formula Methods
1. Step by Step Method
We start with $100 in the account, which is shown at t = 0.
We then multiply the initial amount, and each succeeding
beginning-of-year amount, by (1 + I) = (1.05). You earn
$100(0.05) = $5 of interest during the first year, so the
amount at the end of Year 1 (or at t = 1) is
5-9
Solving for FV: Formula Approach
2. Formula Approach
In the step-by-step approach, we multiplied the amount
at the beginning of each period by (1 + I) = (1.05). Notice
that the value at the end of Year 2 is
3. Financial Calculators
•Requires 4 inputs into calculator, and will solve for the
fifth. (Set to P/YR = 1 and END mode.)
INPUTS 3 10 -100 0
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT 133.10
4. Spreadsheet/Excel
Excel: =FV(rate,nper,pmt,pv,type)
5-11
What is the present value (PV) of $100 due in
3 years, if I/YR = 10%?
0 1 2 3
10%
PV = ? 100
5-12
Solving for PV:
The Formula Method
5-13
Difference Between Simple and compound Rate
3-14
Finding interest rate?
INPUTS 3 10 0 100
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT -75.13
Excel: =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)
5-17
Solving for I: What annual interest rate would cause
$100 to grow to $125.97 in 3 years?
Excel: =RATE(nper,pmt,pv,fv,type,guess)
5-18
Solving for N: If sales grow at 20% per year,
how long before sales double?
INPUTS 20 -1 0 2
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT 3.8
EXCEL: =NPER(rate,pmt,pv,fv,type)
5-19
Concept of Annuity
An annuity
It is a series of equal cash flows paid at equal time
intervals for a finite number of periods.
A lease that calls for payments of $1000 each month
for a year would be referred to as a “12-period, $1000
annuity.”
Note that, strictly speaking, in order for a series of
cash flows to be considered an annuity, each cash flow
must be identical and the amount of time between
each cash flow must be the same in all cases. There are
two types of annuities that vary only in the timing of
the first cash flow (Ordinary annuity and due annuity).
3-20
What is the difference between an ordinary
annuity and an annuity due?
Ordinary Annuity
0 1 2 3
I%
Annuity Due
0 1 2 3
I%
5-21
Discussion Question?
3-22
Ordinary annuity: Computation
3-23
FUTURE VALUE OF AN ANNUITY DUE
3-24
Present Value Of An Ordinary Annuity: Computation
3-25
Present Value Of Annuity Due: Computation
3-26
Solving for FV:
3-Year Ordinary Annuity of $100 at 10%
INPUTS 3 10 0 -100
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT 331
Excel: =FV(rate,nper,pmt,pv,type)
Here type = 0.
5-27
Solving for PV:
3-year Ordinary Annuity of $100 at 10%
INPUTS 3 10 100 0
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT -248.69
Excel: =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)
Here type = 0.
5-28
Solving for FV:
3-Year Annuity Due of $100 at 10%
BEGIN
INPUTS 3 10 0 -100
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT 364.10
Excel: =FV(rate,nper,pmt,pv,type)
Here type = 1.
5-29
Solving for PV:
3-Year Annuity Due of $100 at 10%
BEGIN
INPUTS 3 10 100 0
N I/YR PV PMT FV
OUTPUT -273.55
Excel: =PV(rate,nper,pmt,fv,type)
Here type = 1.
5-30
UNEVEN, OR IRREGULAR, CASH FLOWS
Many financial decisions do involve constant payments, many
others involve cash flows that are uneven or irregular. For example,
the dividends on common stocks are typically expected to increase
over time, and investments in capital equipment almost always
generate cash flows that vary from year to year.
There are two important classes of uneven cash flows: (1) those in
which the cash flow stream consists of a series of annuity payments
plus an additional final lump sum in Year N, and (2) all other
uneven streams. Bonds are an instance of the first type, while
stocks and capital investments illustrate the second type. Here’s an
example of each type.
3-31
What is the PV of this uneven cash flow stream?
0 1 2 3 4
10%
5-32
Classification of Interest Rates
5-33
Classification of Interest Rates
3-35
Classification of Interest Rates
3-37
Classification of Interest Rates
5-38
Why is it important to consider effective rates
of return?
5-39
Why is it important to consider effective rates
of return?
5-40
When is each rate used?
5-41
What is the FV of $100 after 3 years under 10%
semiannual compounding? Quarterly compounding?
MN
INOM
FVN PV 1
M
23
0.10
FV3S $100 1
2
FV3S $100(1.05)6 $134.01
FV3Q $100(1.025)12 $134.49
5-42
Question: Can the effective rate ever be equal to the
nominal rate?
5-43
Can the effective rate ever be equal to the nominal
rate?
5-44
What’s the FV of a 3-year $100 annuity, if the quoted
interest rate is 10%, compounded semiannually?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
5%
5-45
Method 1:
Compound Each Cash Flow
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
5%
5-46
Class Exercise 5.20
3-47
Exercise 5.20
3-48
Class Exercise 5.21
Crissie just won the lottery, and she must choose between
three award options. She can elect to receive a lump sum
today of $61 million, to receive 10 end-of-year payments
of $9.5 million, or to receive 30 end-of-year payments of
$5.5 million.
Crissie should accept the 30-year payment option as it carries the highest present value
($68,249,727).
Crissie should accept the 10-year payment option as it carries the highest present value
($63,745,773).
Crissie should accept the lump-sum payment option as it carries the highest present value
($61,000,000).
d. The higher the interest rate, the more useful it is to get money rapidly, because it can be invested
at those high rates and earn lots more money. So, cash comes fastest with #1, slowest with #3,
so the higher the rate, the more the choice is tilted toward #1. You can also think about this
another way. The higher the discount rate, the more distant cash flows are penalized, so again,
#3 looks worst at high rates, #1 best at high rates.
3-50