Management Theory Chapter 5 & 6
Management Theory Chapter 5 & 6
1. Work specialization
2. Departmentalization
3. Chain of command
4. Span of control
5. Centralization and decentralization
6. Formalization
Organizational Structure
1. Work Specialization
The degree to which tasks in the organization are divided
into separate jobs with each step completed by a
different person.
Overspecialization can result in human diseconomies from
boredom, offers no challenge or stimulation, poor quality,
increased absenteeism, and higher turnover.
Ex. To meet daily output goals, the workers specialize in job tasks
such as molding, stitching and sewing, fastening, and so forth.
• Advantages
• Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and people with
common skills, knowledge, and orientations
• In-depth specialization
• Disadvantages
• Poor communication across functional areas
• Limited view of organizational goals
Exhibit 5–2 (cont’d) Geographical Departmentalization
• Advantages
• More effective and efficient handling of specific regional issues
that arise
• Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
• Disadvantages
• Duplication of functions
• Can feel isolated from other organizational areas
Exhibit 5–2 (cont’d) Product Departmentalization
C E O
C o r p o r a tio n
C o rp o ra te
M a n a g e rs
W a s h in g M a c h in e L ig h tin g T e le v is io n
D iv is io n D iv is io n D iv is io n
– Duplication of functions
– Limited view of organizational goals
Exhibit 5–2 (cont’d) Process Departmentalization
Unity of Command
The concept that a person should have one boss and should report only
to that person.
TODAY’S VIEW Although early management theorists (Fayol, Weber, Taylor, Barnard)
believed that chain of command, authority (line and staff), responsibility, and unity of
command were essential, times have changed.
• Many employees, especially in organizations where work revolves around projects, find
themselves reporting to more than one boss, thus violating the unity of command principle.
5. Span of Control
• The number of employees who can be effectively and efficiently supervised by a
manager.
• The traditional view was that managers should not—directly supervise more than
5/6 subordinates.
• Spans also take into account the nature of the work and the needs of
employees.
For instance, at one Nissan plant, 300 supervisors are responsible for 4,300 employees
Organization Structure (cont’d)
• One of the questions that needs to be answered when organizing is “At
what organizational level are decisions made?”
• Centralization
The degree to which decision-making is concentrated at a single point in
the organizations.
Organizations in which top managers make all the decisions and lower-
level employees simply carry out those orders.
• Decentralization
Organizations in which decision-making is pushed down to the managers
who are closest to the action.
• Employee Empowerment
Increasing the decision-making authority (power) of employees.
In large companies especially, lower-level managers are “closer to the
action” and typically have more detailed knowledge about problems and
know how to solve them than top managers
Exhibit 5–4 (cont’d) Factors that Influence the Amount of
Centralization
• More Decentralization
Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at making
decisions.
Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.
Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a say in
what happens.
Company is geographically dispersed.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on
managers having involvement and flexibility to make decisions.
Exhibit 5–4 Factors that Influence the Amount of Centralization
• More Centralization
Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced at making
decisions as upper-level managers.
Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in decisions.
Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of company failure.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on managers
retaining say over what happens.
6. Formalization
The degree to which jobs within the organization are standardized
and
the extent to which employee behavior is guided by rules and
procedures.
Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is to be
done.
Low formalization means fewer constraints on how employees do
their work.
Although some formalization is necessary for consistency and
control, many organizations today rely less on strict rules and
standardization to guide and regulate employee behavior
Organizational Design Decisions
• Mechanistic Organization Organic Organization
A rigid and tightly controlled structure Highly flexible and adaptable structure
High specialization Non-standardized jobs
Rigid departmentalization Fluid team-based structure
Narrow spans of control Little direct supervision
High formalization Minimal formal rules
Limited information network (downward) Open communication network
Low decision participation Empowered employees
Structural decisions are influenced by:
1. Overall strategy of the organization
Organizational structure follows strategy.
For instance, the flexibility and free-flowing information of the organic structure
works well when an organization is pursuing innovations.
The mechanistic organization with its efficiency, stability, and tight controls
works best for companies wanting to tightly control costs
2. Functional structure
Departmentalization by function
Operations, finance, human resources, and product R&D
3. Divisional structure
Composed of separate business units or divisions with limited autonomy
under the coordination and control the parent corporation.
Exhibit 5–7 Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional
Organizational Designs
Contemporary Organizational Designs
Team structures
The entire organization is made up of work groups or self-
managed teams of empowered employees.
Matrix and project structures
Specialistsfrom different functional departments are assigned to
work on projects led by project managers.
Matrix and project participants have two managers.
Inproject structures, employees work continuously on projects;
moving on to another project as each project is completed.
Exhibit 5–9 An Example of a Matrix Organization
Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)
Boundaryless Organization
A flexible and unstructured organizational design that is intended
to break down external barriers between the organization and its
customers and suppliers.
Removes internal (horizontal) boundaries:
– Eliminates the chain of command
– Uses empowered teams rather than departments
Eliminates external boundaries:
Uses
1. virtual,
2. network, and
3. modular organizational structures to get closer to stakeholders.
Removing External Boundaries
1. Virtual Organization
An organization that consists of a small core of full-time employees and
that temporarily hires specialists to work on opportunities that arise.
Ex. an e-mail marketing firm who work from home or offices.
2. Network Organization
A small core organization that outsources its major business functions
(e.g., manufacturing) in order to concentrate what it does best.
Ericsson contracts its manufacturing and even some of its research and
development to more cost-effective contractors in New Delhi, Singapore,
3. Modular Organization
A manufacturing organization that uses outside suppliers to provide
product components for its final assembly operations.
Coordinating Activities